This article discusses the impact of various factors on economic growth such as earthquakes, wars, diseases, taxes, and wealth. It provides solutions to questions related to steady state, capital stock, labour force, and savings. The article also includes figures and equations to explain the concepts.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSIGNMENT Economic Growth Assignment Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSIGNMENT Question 1 An earthquake would lead to a fall in the capital stock but given that there has been no death then the capital per labour falls which leads to the overall output of the economy but the output per labour rises. Question 2 Due to war when a part of the labour force is destroyed it would lead to more capital stock per worker and this would lead to the economy to be on a higher steady state from where it was before the war. Question 3 An increase in diseases like AIDs will lead to a fall in the labour force. This will lead to an increase in the capital per worker, which will move the economy to a new steady state as shown in figure 1.
3ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSIGNMENT Figure 1 Source: Created by Author Question 4 The implication of taxes reduces the steady state level or the growth rate as consumers now have lesser amount in their hands to spend and the saving rate increases but this effect is not permanent (Epstein 2016) . Gt= Tt Yd t= Yt– Tt Ct= (1 − s)Yd t Kt+1= It+ (1 − δ)Kt (1 + n)kt+1= s(yt− τt) + (1 − δ)kt kt+1=s(kα tτβ t−τt)+(1−δ)kt 1+n Steady state condition: s(kατβ− τ ) = δk
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSIGNMENT Figure 2 Source: Created by Author Question 5 (a)The steady state figure would look like figure 2 in case of a high lump sum tax but it will remain unchanged if the tax is less. This is because the government will be buying goods with the tax receipt, which will increase the available capital in the economy so there will be no shifts from the steady state. However if the tax is of a large amount there will be a shift as the disposable income in the hands of individuals will fall and they will have less savings leading to a lower steady state. (b)When the lump sum tax is high the steady state capital level falls due to a fall in the savings. If we start from the left of the steady state level, we will have to raise the capital amount to the prevailing steady state by saving more. Conversely if we are on the right
5ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSIGNMENT then our level of capital investment is higher than what the economy requires for achieving growth and therefore we need to cut down on our savings and consume more. Figure 3 Source: Created by Author Question 6 In the presence of wealth, people have less incentive to save and therefore the steady state is lower. Therefore from figure 4 it can be seen that when h=0, the steady state is higher but when h>0, the steady state shifts as people are not forced to save due to the wealth available to them (Weiss 2015).
6ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSIGNMENT Figure 4 Source: Created by Author gdp= f(k) gnp = (r+δ)h + w w = f(k) - k f ' (k) = f(k) - (r+δ) k ḣ= s[(r + )h+ w] -(n+ g + )h By settingḣ = 0, the steady state can be solved as below h =ws n+δ−s(r+δ)=s(1−α) n+δ−s(r+δ)
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSIGNMENT References Epstein, Gene. "A" Sort of Intellectual Sleight of Hand": How Nobel laureates Paul Krugman, Robert Solow, and Joseph Stiglitz praised Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century, and what that tells us about the state of 21st century economics."The Review of Social and Economic Issues1, no. 3 (2016): 95. Weiss, Janosch. "The Effects of Productivity Growth, Population Growth, and the Rate of Interest on the Distribution of Wealth." (2015).