The paper discusses the monopoly power of Queensland's electricity network and its impact on households and businesses. It examines the characteristics of monopoly market, analyzes the case of Queensland's electricity network as a monopoly, and discusses the inefficiencies and possible government solutions.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS Economics for Business Name of the Student Name of the University Course ID
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................2 Analysis......................................................................................................................................2 Characteristics of monpoly....................................................................................................2 Monopoly: A case study of Queensland’s eletricty network.................................................2 Inefficiencies in the monopoly market government intervention..........................................5 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................6 References..................................................................................................................................7 NAME, STUDENT ID
2ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS Introduction The paper attempts to discuss monopoly in Australia. The case of monopoly power particularly taken into consideration is Queensland’s electricity network. The monopoly power of few large firms in the electricity network affects both household and business. Households end up with paying a high bill following a high price of electricity. Increase in energy costs increases cost for businesses (Grant, 2018). The paper examines characteristics of market power of firms similar to a monopoly in the concerned industry, inefficiencies rising from monopoly and possible government solution to correct the inefficiencies. Analysis Characteristics of monpoly Monopoly is defined as a form of market in which, only a single seller operates in the market. Some common characteristics of monopoly market include single seller serving a large group of buyers, unique product, entry barriers and price making power(Cowen & Tabarrok, 2015). Unlike competitive firms, monopolist can enjoy an above normal profit both in short run and long run. Monopoly: A case study of Queensland’s eletricty network The electricity network is considered as a natural monopoly. Because of very high costs of business, set up it is generally cost effective for government to allow a single firm in the market (Nelson et al., 2017).In Queensland, massive high price of electricity is creating hurdlesforresidentialcustomers.High-energypricesaredestroyinginternational competitiveness for businesses. Review of electricity market reveals that the main driver of high electricity prices is the high profit margin and price influencing power of monopoly networks in Queensland. Energex, Ergon Energy and Powerlink Queensland enjoy significant NAME, STUDENT ID
3ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS monopoly power in the market. In the last decade, electricity prices have increased at the fastest rate in the nation (Accc.gov.au, 2018). Figure 1: Change in electricity bills resulted from high price (Source: Accc.gov.au, 2018). Likemonopoly,thesecompaniesexploittheirmonopolypowerandcharge unnecessary high price in order to secure revenue above that of the efficient level. In the last five years, electricity networks in Queensland attained an annual profit margin growing up to 48 percent constituting an average margin of 28.3 percent (Grant, 2018). The average profit margin of electricity companies are higher than that of other energy businesses. In every dollar spend by consumers of electricity, these networks earn a profit margin close to 47 percent. Figure 1: Annual average rate of profit in the last five years NAME, STUDENT ID
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS (Source: Grant, 2018) The return of government owned networks is in sharp contrast to that of the government owned generators. In contrast to the monopoly network of Queensland, the competitive market structure of government owned generators constituted inefficiency and over-investment. The government owned generators suffered a loss in the last few decade (Simshauser & Whish-Wilson, 2017). Operating in a monopoly market, the electricity networks have enjoyed high profits over since 1990s. The high profit resulted from higher long-term financial return. The return for electricity network grids are higher than most other sectors in the economy (Accc.gov.au, 2018). The profit margin is 23 times more than Australian construction, 15.5 times higher than telecommunication sector, 10.5 times than Australian resource and mineral sector and 10 time higher than Australian banking. Figure 2: Comparison of returns with other sectors (Source: Grant, 2018) NAME, STUDENT ID
5ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS Inefficiencies in the monopoly market government intervention Figure 3: Inefficiency under monopoly market (Source: Cowen & Tabarrok, 2015) The efficient competitive market equilibrium occurs where price equal marginal cost of production. In contrast, equilibrium in a monopoly market is achieved at the point where revenue earned from the last unit sold is same as the additional cost of producing the last unit. The price under monopoly is higher compared to the marginal cost while output produced in the market is lower than the socially efficient outcome (Stoneman, Bartoloni & Baussola, 2018). The inefficient allocation of resources under monopoly leads to a deadweight loss indicated by the area E+F. Currently, both residentialcustomers and business suffer due to high price of electricity. Government therefore should take measures to control price and secure interest of customers. ACCC has already attempted to find out the root cause of higher electricity prices and taken several policy measures to reduce electricity prices (Accc.gov.au, 2018).Instead of NAME, STUDENT ID
6ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS allowing the monopoly networks to manipulate national regulator, government should ensure that companies set prices at the socially efficient level. In order to restrict profit of the monopolynetwork,AustralianNationalRegulatorputsanupperlimitofrevenues. Governmentshouldimplementfiscalcontrolstorestrictincomeextractionwithin the sustainable level. Conclusion Given high cost of setting up electricity grid, there is only a few large company controlling the electricity network of Queensland. The near monopoly structure of the market allow firms to charge a high price and enjoys a high return. The burden of high electricity bills adversely affects both residential and business customers. Realizing the inefficient from the monopoly power government attempts to control price and revenue. However, there is room for government intervention to restore efficiency in the market. NAME, STUDENT ID
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS References Accc.gov.au. (2018). ACCC releases blueprint to reduce electricity prices. Retrieved from https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-releases-blueprint-to-reduce-electricity- prices Accc.gov.au.(2018).RestoringelectricityaffordabilityandAustralia’scompetitive advantage. Retrieved from https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Retail%20Electricity %20Pricing%20Inquiry%E2%80%94Final%20Report%20June%202018_Exec %20summary.pdf Cowen,T.,&Tabarrok,A.(2015).Modernprinciplesofmicroeconomics.Macmillan International Higher Education. Grant, H. (2018). Biggest winners, and biggest losers, of network monopoly game. Retrieved fromhttps://reneweconomy.com.au/biggest-winners-and-biggest-losers-of-network- monopoly-game-36731/ Nelson, T., Bashir, S., McCracken‐Hewson, E., & Pierce, M. (2017). The Changing Nature of the Australian Electricity Industry.Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy,36(2), 104-120. Simshauser,P.,&Whish-Wilson,P.(2017).PricediscriminationinAustralia'sretail electricitymarkets:AnanalysisofVictoria&SoutheastQueensland.Energy Economics,62, 92-103. Stoneman, P., Bartoloni,E., & Baussola,M. (2018).The Microeconomicsof Product Innovation. Oxford University Press. NAME, STUDENT ID