1ECONOMICS Table of Contents Answer to Question 1:.....................................................................................................................2 Answer to Question 2:.....................................................................................................................3 Answer to Question 3:.....................................................................................................................4 References:......................................................................................................................................6
2ECONOMICS Answer to Question 1: The two market structures that have been considered include perfect competition and monopolistic competition and they are described briefly as follows: Perfect competition: In this type of market, there are numerous sellers and purchasers where the sellers are price takers selling homogenous goods and both parties have sound knowledge of the products (Tyers, 2015). For example, KFC and McDonalds in Australia are food suppliers that sell homogeneous products, which provide the purchasers to switch over from one company to another. Moreover, since the sellers constitute of small portions of market share, their influence on price is minimal and thus, they are price-takers. Moreover, all the customers have sound knowledge of product prices and the workers have full details of wages, which prove that all the participants have perfect knowledge. Monopolistic competition: In monopolistic competition, there are many firms having differentiated products with close substitutes; however, there is no price competition. For instance, Toyota, Iveco Australia, HSV and others fall in this market, in which there are various sellers and buyers ((Cato & Matsumura, 2015). All the organisations manufacture cars; however, their characteristics are different.Despitethedifferentiationofproducts,theyareclosesubstitutes.Duetothis differentiation, various organisations attempt to make up the differences by using special discounts or advertising for raising their demand. Hence, no price competition exists among the firms.
3ECONOMICS Therefore, the above-stated instances are justified clearly, as fast food companies fall under perfectcompetitionandthe automobilefirmsinAustraliafallundermonopolistic competition. Answer to Question 2: Australia has benefitted from free trade agreements, as the GDP and household incomes of the nation have increased widely. In 2016, the real GDP of Australia has increased by 5.4% and the real income of the households has risen by above $8,400. Moreover, free trade agreements of Australia with Japan, China and South China are expected to create additional 14,500 jobs by the end of 2020 (Dfat.gov.au, 2018). Finally, the products are offered at cheaper prices for the Australian businesses and households. The prices of garments, small electrical appliances and motor vehicles have declined by 8%, 7% and 11% respectively. In general, free trade agreements are crucial for nations so that their economies could be developed further. The following are the major benefits expected from free trade agreements: Increased resources: Since the countries have restricted access to resources such as labour, land and capital, free trade agreements assure that smaller countries could accumulate necessary resources for manufacturing consumer goods and services. Improved life quality: The countries could import products, which are not available readily. In fact, the products could be obtained at cheaper rates (Petri et al., 2017). Various developing nations do not have access to production for converting raw materials into valuable products.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ECONOMICS Improved foreign relation: The global threats often confront the developing nations. Free trade would help in developing better foreign relations for these nations. Production efficiency: If there is unavailability of proper resources or lack of knowledge, it might lead to inefficient production. With the help of free trade, the developing nations could fill the gaps in relation to their production processes. Answer to Question 3: Technology and innovation provide certain benefits to the labour market. The acquisition of skills and higher productivity has direct effect on the labour market. The technological innovation and up gradation has helped in expansion of the product market having direct and positive impact on the labour market and their related income (Ashton, Maguire & Spilsbury, 2016). The industries where the technological changes are higher have greater wages. The new skills that the workers have learnt become their market assets. This has helped in increasing the productivity per capital unit and productivity per worker. Technological advancements and changes are disruptive in nature at the time they develop new market entirely displacing an existing technology and market. However, in case of labour market, new skill acquisition is significant. One of the most active production factors is labour. At the time it is possible for new technologies to manufacture new kinds of products; there would be demand for labour in order to acquire these new skills along with manufacturing the new products. Some instances of disruptive innovation include cloud-based computing,
5ECONOMICS mobile internet and robotics. However, they do not disrupt the labour market; instead, they help in developing new opportunities for the workers so that the new skills could be acquired (Autor, Dorn & Hanson, 2015). Based on the above evaluation, it could be inferred that there is positive influence of technology on the labour market and disruptive technology and innovation further adds to the acquisition of new skills for the workers.
6ECONOMICS References: Ashton, D., Maguire, M., & Spilsbury, M. (2016).Restructuring the labour market: The implications for youth. Springer. Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2015). Untangling trade and technology: Evidence from local labour markets.The Economic Journal,125(584), 621-646. Cato, S., & Matsumura, T. (2015). Optimal privatisation and trade policies with endogenous market structure.Economic Record,91(294), 309-323. Dfat.gov.au.(2018).Retrieved11July2018,from http://dfat.gov.au/trade/resources/Documents/benefits-of-trade-and-investment.pdf Petri, P. A., Plummer, M. G., Urata, S., & Zhai, F. (2017). Going it alone in the Asia-Pacific: Regional trade agreements without the United States. Tyers, R. (2015). Service Oligopolies and Australia's Economy‐Wide Performance.Australian Economic Review,48(4), 333-356.