Elizabeth Quay Project

This project management report identifies a specific engineering project, that is core to the chosen company Wood and grieve engineer’s operations. The project that has been nominated for this plan is Elizabeth Quay. The waterfront development project is a mixed use development project, located in the north shore of Perth water and named in the honour of the second queen Elizabeth II.

Running head: ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
Industrial Experience: Elizabeth Quay Project
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:

1ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
Table of Contents
Project details.............................................................................................................................2
Project definition....................................................................................................................2
Scope management.................................................................................................................3
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) including itemised budget/expenses and project phases
................................................................................................................................................4
2. A Gantt chart of all major project tasks.................................................................................4
3. Project Integration Management (PIM) plan.........................................................................6
4. Investment risk management plan..........................................................................................7
5. Relevant standards and laws..................................................................................................8
6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).......................................................................................8
7. Basis of Design (BOD)..........................................................................................................9
8. Appropriate accompanying documentation, log book templates, drawings........................10
9. Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)..........................................................11
References................................................................................................................................12

2ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
Project details
Project definition
This project management report identifies a specific engineering project, that is core
to the chosen company Wood and grieve engineer’s operations. This report is an initial
project management plan that will be approved by the project executive before the final
commence of the project. The project that has been nominated for this plan is Elizabeth
Quay. The waterfront development project is a mixed use development project, located in the
north shore of Perth water and named in the honour of the second queen Elizabeth II. This
project is about design and construction of an artificial inlet including nine different building
sites.
In addition to this, the completed project facilities are projected to involve
approximately 1700 residential apartments along with a retail space and office space of
respectively 39000 square meter and 150,000 square meters. This project is one of the most
awaited projects as it reconnects the Perth City Center along with the Swan River. Wood and
grieve engineer’s (WGE), is engaged via LandCrop in the year of 2007 for providing
engineering services for the project in the very initial feasibility phase. Throughout the
project development period the engineering service provider company will offer hydraulic,
electrical, underground power, mechanical, civil and structural services. Georgiou Group has
constructed the forward development stages of the project that involve major infrastructure to
the project owners that include:
 It offers twin 2.25 meter diameter of a main drainage relocation system
 It also offers a new western power high voltage city power supply that access
the chamber and also conduit the system

3ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
 A 800 to 400 mm diameter of water mains along with an adjustment to sewer
the mains and utility services
Scope management
The scopes of the Elizabeth Quay project are as follows:
 A static pile load testing will be conducted to imitate a bridge pile
 For construction of the Kisok 4, Hummerston Kisok, Kisok 6 and pedestrian
bridge CFA pile foundation and conventional foundations are assigned. In the
proposed Transperth Ferry terminal location for the construction of the canopy
the conventional pile foundations are required
 In order to enable the proposed water feature construction temporary sheet pile
is required by the assigned project manager and construction leads
 For 10% of the foundation piles a pile integrity testing will also be conducted
under the supervision of the project manager and steering committee members
The Elizabeth Quay project is identified as a major urban development project in
Perth which is expected to provide major additional inner city, residential, commercial office
space and hotels. The area undertaken for the successful construction of the project is 10
hectors of prime land in the riverfront. In addition to this it also includes a complete
construction of roads, park, promenades, and inlets along with a connecting bridge. Shops,
café, entertainment venues and restaurants will be surrounding the entire inlet.

4ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) including itemised budget/expenses and
project phases
0
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
5
5.1
5.2
Schedule for Elizabeth
Quay project
$255,720.00 7,000 hours
Project initiation
$7,720.00 200 hours
Developing scope
statement for waterfront
development project
$0.00 0 hours
Design project charter
$2,400.00 48 hours
Feasibility study
$2,520.00 72 hours
Resource identification
$2,800.00 80 hours
Project planning
$173,120.00 4,832 hours
Construction outline
(blueprint)
$18,000.00 400 hours
construction of residential
area
$42,000.00 1,200 hours
construction of office
location
$42,000.00 1,200 hours
construction of the
connecting bridge
$35,840.00 1,024 hours
construction of
surroundimg shops,
hospitals etc
$35,280.00 1,008 hours
Project execution
$19,800.00 520 hours
Hydraulic testing
$12,600.00 360 hours
Pile load testing
$3,600.00 80 hours
Electricity mapping
$3,600.00 80 hours
Project monitoring and
control
$52,000.00 1,360 hours
Change management
program
$16,000.00 400 hours
Launching of a publicity
campaign
$16,800.00 480 hours
Analysis of MRA released
new design details and
guidelines
$19,200.00 480 hours
Project closure
$3,080.00 88 hours
Stakeholder signoff
$1,400.00 40 hours
Final draft submission
$1,680.00 48 hours
Figure 1: Work Breakdown structure of the project
(Source: created by author)
2. A Gantt chart of all major project tasks
WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish
0 Schedule for Elizabeth Quay project 733 days Thu 5/30/19 Mon
3/21/22
1 Project initiation 33 days Thu 5/30/19 Mon
7/15/19

5ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
1.1 Developing scope statement for waterfront
development project 8 days Thu 5/30/19 Mon
6/10/19
1.2 Design project charter 6 days Tue 6/11/19 Tue 6/18/19
1.3 Feasibility study 9 days Wed
6/19/19 Mon 7/1/19
1.4 Resource identification 10 days Tue 7/2/19 Mon
7/15/19
2 Project planning 454 days Tue 7/16/19 Fri 4/9/21
2.1 Construction outline (blueprint) 50 days Tue 7/16/19 Mon
9/23/19
2.2 construction of residential area 150 days Tue 9/24/19 Mon
4/20/20
2.3 construction of office location 150 days Tue 9/24/19 Mon
4/20/20
2.4 construction of the connecting bridge 128 days Tue 4/21/20 Thu
10/15/20
2.5 construction of surrounding shops, hospitals etc 126 days Fri 10/16/20 Fri 4/9/21
3 Project execution 65 days Mon
4/12/21 Fri 7/9/21
3.1 Hydraulic testing 45 days Mon
4/12/21 Fri 6/11/21
3.2 Pile load testing 10 days Mon
6/14/21 Fri 6/25/21
3.3 Electricity mapping 10 days Mon
6/28/21 Fri 7/9/21
4 Project monitoring and control 170 days Mon
7/12/21 Fri 3/4/22
4.1 Change management program 50 days Mon
7/12/21 Fri 9/17/21
4.2 Launching of a publicity campaign 60 days Mon
9/20/21
Fri
12/10/21
4.3 Analysis of MRA released new design details
and guidelines 60 days Mon
12/13/21 Fri 3/4/22
5 Project closure 11 days Mon 3/7/22 Mon
3/21/22
5.1 Stakeholder signoff 5 days Mon 3/7/22 Fri 3/11/22
5.2 Final draft submission 6 days Mon
3/14/22
Mon
3/21/22

6ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
3. Project Integration Management (PIM) plan
The Design is not the ultimate thing that helps the project managers to obtain
commercial growth and long term competitive success. The thoughts and design those are
being planned needs to be integrated and then implemented together for project success. In
other words, the success and failure of any project is dependent on the project integration
management plan that has been developed by the project steering committee members.
The project integration management phases are comprises of 5 phases- project
initiation, project planning, project execution, project monitoring and control and project
closure. Throughout the project development period the project manager and the steering
committee members are required to follow the steps periodically. During the implementation
of the Elizabeth Quay project if any of the development phase is missed then it will hamper
the expected project outcomes and expectation of the clients. For Elizabeth Quay project the
developed project integration management plan (PIM) is as follows:
Project initiation: Before initiating the project the project manager should develop
the project charter to formally authorize the project from the Australian Government. The
charter demonstrates the project goals and the desired project deliverables as well. It
identifies the project sponsors and supplies who will be involved in the development process.
In Elizabeth Quay project the construction responsibility will be taken by Wood and grieve
engineer’s (WGE).
Project planning phase: The project planning phase identifies the master project plan
including the project schedule, resources, scope, stakeholders and time of the project. As the
plan is prepared the first responsibility of the project manager becomes to complete the
project within the estimated budget, time and resources. Baseline is needed to be used by the
project manager during the project progress period to measure the cost and schedule variance.

7ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
Project execution phase: In this phase the design that has been developed is
implemented by the contractors and construction heads. The waterfront development project
will construct residential areas, hotels, office building, parks, hospital and a connecting
bridge in Perth also.
Monitoring and controlling: Throughout the project development period, control
and monitoring are needed to track the current status of the project and make sure that the
project is governing towards the expectation of the owner and consumers as well. If it is
tracked that the project progress is not going well and required further focus then respective
change management plan will be implemented.
Project closure: The project closes with a signoff. The project closure measures and
evaluates the project objectives and actual outcomes. Based on that, a maintenance plan is
also developed by the project managers and approved from the government.
4. Investment risk management plan
Risk
Id
Risk name Impact Possibilities Risk
ranking
Mitigation strategies
R2 Over allocation of
resources
High 4 Most likely
5
Extreme
15
Before initiation of the project
a resource management plan
needs to be conducted
R1 Over running
project budget
Catastrophic
5
Rare 1 Low 5 Feasibility study
R4 Delay in
implementation
High 4 Possible 3 High 12 Based on complexity of each
project activity proper time
should be assigned for each
phase
R3 Lack of Medium 3 Unlikely 2 Medium The project associates should

8ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
communication 6 use open communication while
interacting to each other.
5. Relevant standards and laws
The relevant laws and standards those will be considered during the design and
implementation of the Elizabeth Quay project include:
Legislations
 The detail Planning and Development by (Act 2005)
 Metropolitan development authority Act by 2011

The planning and Development based on Local Planning Scheme
 Regulation of 2015
 City Planning Scheme: 2
 Central Perth redevelopment scheme: 2
Name of the policy:
 City Development Design Guidelines
 Plot ratio
 Signs policy
 Parking policy
 Building height and setbacks
 Loading and unloading
6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
The Key Performance indicators (KPI) for the Elizabeth Quay project are as follows:

9ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
 Net dollar amounts invested by the sponsors for the development of the
waterfront
 Value of the cooperative market funding
 The direct commercial impact of sponsors
 Tracking the project progress
 Assessment of client satisfaction level
 Cost monitoring
 Comparing the performance throughput and also in between he project
7. Basis of Design (BOD)
Figure 2: Basic of design of the Elizabeth Quay project

10ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
8. Appropriate accompanying documentation, log book templates,
drawings
Project name: The waterfront development project, Elizabeth Quay in Perth
Project scope  temporary sheet pile is required by the assigned project manager
and construction leads
 For 10% of the foundation piles a pile integrity testing pile load
testing will be conducted to imitate a bridge pile
 For construction of the Kisok 4, Hummerston Kisok, Kisok 6 and
pedestrian bridge CFA pile foundation and conventional
foundations are assigned.
Time: 2 years Project developer company: Wood and grieve
engineer’s
Budget: $260,000 Involved stakeholders:
 Project manager
 Finance manager
 Contractor
 Sub contractor
 Civil engineer
 Architect
 Designer
 Resource manager
 Operation head
 Project suppliers
 Executive

11ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
9. Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)
Figure 3: PERT chart of the project
(Source: created by author)

12ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
References
[1] E. C., Conforto, F., Salum, D. C., Amaral, S. L., da Silva, and L. F. M. de Almeida Can
agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?. Project
Management Journal, 45(3), 21-34., 2014
[2] S.,Conger, Six sigma and business process management. In Handbook on Business
Process Management 1 (pp. 127-146). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2015.
[3] F M. B. First,. Adopting a continuous improvement model for future DSM
revisions. World Psychiatry, 15(3), 223-224. 2016
[4] Q. W., Fleming, and J. M. Koppelman. Earned value project management. Project
Management Institute. 2016, December.
[5] K.,Heldman, 2015. PMP project management professional exam deluxe study guide:
updated for the (2015) Exam. John Wiley and Sons. 2015
[6] H. A., Hornstein,. The integration of project management and organizational change
management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-
298., 2015.
[7] H. A. Hornstein. The integration of project management and organizational change
management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-
298., 2015
[8] R., Joslin, and R. Müller. Relationships between a project management methodology and
project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project
Management, 33(6), 1377-1392. 2015.

13ELIZABETH QUAY PROJECT
[9] H., Kerzner, and H. R. Kerzner. Project management: a systems approach to planning,
scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons. 2017.