Employee And Labor Relations Assignment

Running head: EMPLOYEE AND LABOR RELATIONS
Employee and Labor Relations
Name of the student:
Name of the university:
Author Note

EMPLOYEE AND LABOR RELATIONS
1
Essay on unions at Canadian public sector:
It is seen the public sector has been greatly unionized at the country of Canada. About eighty
percent of the employee in the public sector are eligible for the case of collective bargaining. This is
covered through collective agreements as compared to twenty-five percent in the private sector. The
Workplace Information and Research Division related to the labor program has been undertaking a
survey of every labor organization annually (Dobuzinskis & Howlett, 2018). This denotes to the
bargaining units of fifty or more number of labors. In this report, the ways conditions at which the
unions of the public sector are operating distinct from the situations of unions organizing workers of
private sectors are analyzed. Then, the way they are similar is also determined here. The reason why
employers in the public sector have changes to austerity policies are also investigated here. Next, the
way to pursue those policies is also determined. Furthermore, it is also analyzed whether the unions
in the public sector can create an efficient movement against any sort of austerity is also examined
here.
Situations at which public sector unions make activities distinct from the situations of unions
of private sectors:
The maximum of the health care and municipal employees are from the CUPE or Canadian
Union of Public Employees. They have the right to bargaining the same as those in private sectors.
Again, most of the employees of the federal government are from 150,000 members from Canada’s
Public Service Alliance (Fairbrother, 2015). These unions of the public sector developed from the
associations of a docile employee to actual trade unions. Teachers and nurses are seen to bargaining
the collective agreements on the basis of province-wide. The broader expansion has taken place in
ten services and programs of public-sectors from the year 1965 to 1975 (Sverke, 2019). The high
upsurge of the union members has permitted the provincial and federal government staffs for
obtaining restricted rights of bargaining. The public service delivery has gone important

EMPLOYEE AND LABOR RELATIONS
2
modifications during the 90s. Restructuring, wage freezes, service cutbacks, privatizations, and
deregulations have given rise to strained relations between unions and staff of public sectors.
They are similar in the way that that the prevailing theories have been treating the
bureaucrats as just some subordinated. They are controlled by political authorities from the above.
Nonetheless, the control relationship is able to run in both directions. This is never because the
bureaucrats consist of expertise and additional sources of private data. Under a democratic system, it
is seen that the authorities are chosen. It provides the bureaucrats with the scope of exercising the
electoral power. This is to find out who must occupy the authority positions and the options to be
made at the office (Bennett & Kaufman, 2016). It can be indeed odd as the pubic level bureaucrats
and unions never invest at those types of reverse control and there is any sort of ample prove to
perform that.
Employers in the public sector turn towards the austerity policies:
Here, the austerity can never be merely interpreted as the case of the shrinking of the state.
The workers of the public sectors are asked to tighten the belts. For instance, CSIS or “Canadian
Security Intelligence Service”, is seen to be getting a great boost towards funding. This is also after
the debacle of Toronto G20 summit and various reports of harassment of CSIS of the activists
specifically at indigenous and the solidarity movement of Palestine. The special diet transfers and
welfares and the planning for expanding the transit of public that are seen to be trimmed.
Nevertheless, the new types of fighter planes and also the military hawks are seen to be questioning
are ordered (Gunderson, 2017). Further, the agenda of austerity is regarding great versus smaller
government. This is about the rise of punitive and repressive governmental aspects and the shrinking
of redistributive type of programs along with democratic gains. As all the aspects are considered the
ore agenda governments are pursuing as been this was the saving private power.