Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector
Verified
Added on 2023/06/04
|11
|3191
|198
AI Summary
This essay analyzes the challenges of attracting and retaining employees in the agriculture sector. It discusses the challenges of managing human capital, aggressive competition, lack of career development and promotion opportunities, employee turnover, and lack of human resource planning.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 1 Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector Student’s Name University
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 2 Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector Employee attraction and retention is a major challenge that most organizations struggle with since they fail to create conditions that satisfy the ever-changing needs of employees at all times. In the modern work, employee needs keep on changing since they have access to information through the internet which makes them more informed and aware of their rights at all times (Aguinis & Kraiger, 2009). The changing nature of the Australian workforce from permanent related to part-time related had created more challenges in retaining. The agriculture sector is one of the challenging sectors to manage employee-related issues since it is regarded as an area for the unskilled and less skilled sector (Kucherov & Zavyalova, 2012). Unlike other fields like medicine or nursing, it is uncommon to hear or read about related issues in the agriculture sector. This is because the sector is seen as dormant and not labour competitive like other sectors. This essay analyses the challenges of attracting and retaining employees in the agriculture sector. The Australian agriculture sector is wide with different agriculture areas which account for 2.581% of employment in Australia. This sector employees both permanent and part-time employees who are paid in different forms like wages, salaries, piece rates, tips and even some are paid in kind. This has made the sector challenging since trends in the industry cannot be well documented (Perla, et al., 2015). Such challenges make it difficult to address employee-related issues and how they can be addressed. The sector is one of the most difficult to manage employee-related issues since most people view it as less informed thus mostly requiring unskilled or semiskilled labour to run business operations.
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 3 One challenge in employee attraction and retention in the agriculture sector is managing human capital. Human capital management is concerned with generating employee related data to inform decisions that can be made in the organization on how to improve employee conditions (Hutchings, De-Cier, & Shea, 2011). This approach views work as requiring a new set of skills that do not exist in the organization and need to be added. This approach views people as assets that can be improved by investing in them to make them more competitive and attractive. This means that the sector needs to put measures in place to ensure that resources are channeled to individual employee capabilities to make them more attractive and reliable to the organization. The agriculture sector faces the challenge of human capital management because most employees are not permanently informed but rather work on a part-time basis (Canadian Agricultural Human Resource Council, 2009). Further, the informal nature of agriculture makes it difficult to attract the skilled labour force since such employees can only work on higher level jobs. According to the theory of human capital, skills, experience and knowledge have an economic value to organizations since they make them productive and adaptable to the ever- changing nature of the business environment. From the resource-based view, organizational resources that are of value for the basis of competitive advantage for the organization. This means that firms have to accumulate these resources through the management of skills, process and routines to achieve competitive advantage (Pauwe, 2004). This means that farms can achieve competitive advantage if they work on how to manage their human capital through attraction and retention. However, since the agriculture sector relies more on the less skilled labour, then it becomes difficult to attract and retain people in the sector. Unlike other sectors like health where people and even governments
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 4 are more concerned about the standards used, the agriculture sector lacks such support from the government and other sectors in ensuring that proper conditions are created for people who work there (Gates & Langevin, 2010). Even though there may be unions and employee bodies for supporting and addressing employee-related issues, it becomes difficult to achieve reasonable attraction since most people here are partly employed. The reason why people are not fully engaged is that some of the agriculture firms fear engaging employees on a permanent basis. This makes it difficult to manage human resources in the sector since it the sector lacks the functional prerequisites for employee retention. According to Afiouni (2013) when an organization has challenges in managing its human capital, then there are problems in employee motivation. From Herzberg's two factor theory, organizations are required to create conducive conditions by meeting both extrinsic and intrinsic conditions at work. Becker, Hyland, & Sooay (2013) suggest that this creates better work conditions that make jobs attractive and easy for employees to work thus increasing retention. The agriculture sector lacks such advantages which make it difficult to retain employees in the sector. The agriculture sector is seen as less attractive due to the public perception of seeing it as a dirty and low-income enterprise. This means that there is the need for strategies to be put in place to address the public perception of the agriculture sector. This calls for the need to reposition and renew the image of agriculture through developing a collaborative unified initiative to promote the agriculture so that people can see it like any other job opportunity that exists in the market. Another factor that makes retention and attraction of employees in the agriculture sector is aggressive competition. This is due to the shortages in labour in Australia and the need for
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 5 agriculture to compete with other sectors in the country. This means that the agriculture sector has to aggressively compete with other sectors for the limited number of employees in the country (Miles, Rolfe, & Noonan, 2006). This challenge begins early at the college level where other sectors have made their programs more attractive thus attracting students to their programs. This is because most students are enticed into other non-agricultural programs which leave the sector with a limited number of graduates in the market. As such, it becomes difficult for the agriculture sector to have enough skilled labour that can be attracted into the field. The theory of attraction retention suggests that employees are attracted to some sectors if they feel that the sector meets the conditions that they seek to achieve in the future. In Australia, most students who have joined agriculture courses had been engaged in vocational agricultural programs earlier. This calls for the need to make the sector more attractive so that students can see it as competitive as other programs. Further, there is need to deal with dissatisfiers that challenge attraction and retention in the sector. Such factors can be addressed through competitive compensations, good working conditions and job security. Kramar, Bartram, De-Cieri, Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright (2014) this creates better conditions that make employee expectations in the sector high. This calls for developing a working framework to develop satisfiers in the agriculture sector. This satisfaction will create better conditions and make the sector more attractive thus increasing attraction and retention (Noe, 2010). For the agriculture sector to grow, it has to compete with other sectors like construction which tend to be more attractive to people since it offers better advantages. This means that the sector needs to create growth opportunities and offer progressive opportunities that allow employees to predict their future in the organization. Such conditions
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 6 make the job itself attractive which increases retention levels (Kramar, Bartram, De-Cieri, Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright, 2014). Every individual enjoys working in a sector that is promising and allows them to predict the future of their work in the sector. This can also be achieved through the promotion of agriculture, promoting careers in agriculture and lastly promoting actual job opportunities in the sector that makes people interested in the sector. Lack of career development and promotion opportunities are some of the challenges that the sector faces. In most agriculture-related sectors there are low career development opportunities because of the nature of the sector itself. Most agricultural sectors are regarded as less informal while the formal areas that work in the organization are limited to few higher level management opportunities in the organization. Career development is an important element in employee retention since it allows employees to predict their future benefits from the organization (Kraimer, Seibert, Wayne, Liden, & Bravo, 2011). Career development is used as a strategy for reducing job hoping in organizations where opportunities for growth and gaining from the organization are seen. For employees to be retained, they must be able to see their future in the organization through increased privileges in their career. Job hoping mentality exists when employees are less satisfied with existing work conditions and they seek other job opportunities as a way of meeting their professional needs (Kramar, Bartram, De-Cieri, Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright, 2014). Most agriculture sector areas lack career stages of development that form the career path an employee goes through before retiring. The fact that the sector is regarded as less attractive and lacking career development opportunities makes it difficult for the organization to attract new employees and retain existing ones.
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 7 Most agriculture-related organizations have low career planning strategies for developing their employees and meeting their needs. This is seen in the lack of top talent attraction and job satisfaction as a way of attracting and retaining new employees. Since the sector is regarded as less formal, it means that most employees who work in the sector have fewer skills that makes it difficult to address their needs. Career planning is a strategic requirement for the organization that requires firms to plan for the careers that they require and at the same time developing succession patterns for employees that exit (Aguinis & Kraiger, 2009). When an organization identifies its employee needs and puts proper strategies in place to meet its needs, it becomes easy for the organization to plan for its employee needs. When there is no career planning in an organization, there are challenges in meeting labour market demands that make the job more attractive. Employee turnover is another challenge that the agriculture sector faces in Australia. Job turnover makes an organization vulnerable to its competitors since it becomes expensive for the organization to meet the requirements of hiring new employees. The cost of replacing skilled employees in an organization is reported to be 150% of the employee’s salary. This means that every time the sector loses an employee to other sectors, then it incurs losses (Onah & Anikwe, 2016). High turnover in the agriculture sector is caused by low compensation, poor work/life balance, and low enforcement of labour rules. The agriculture sector by nature is seasonal thus having low peak seasons when labour is intensively required. These factors create poor working conditions that make it difficult for employees to work in such sectors. This means that the sector is less attractive as compared to other industries like construction or health that create better conditions for their employees thus reducing turnover. This is the reason why the Australian
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 8 system in Canada hires foreign workers to address the skill and labour challenges in the country. This is through programs of seasonal agricultural worker program that allow organizations to hire employees on a part-time basis during peaks seasons. Lack of human resource planning is one of the other challenges in attracting and retaining employees in the agriculture sector. Most industries have human resource planning strategies that seek to ensure that the job opportunities in the sector are attractive and evolve with the current trends in the labour market. The nature of human workforce in this century is different from what existed in the past century (Kucherov & Zavyalova, 2012). This means that the agriculture sector needs to evolve along with other industries by addressing the changing needs in the workforce. Through human resource planning, industries identify employment gaps and work with institutions to develop programs that empower students with such skills for meeting the changes in the workforce. Such initiatives ensure that there is a study supply of workforce and factors are put in place to make the sector more attractive. Students enroll more in courses that offer promising job security rather than those that they are not sure of where to work once they graduate. Unlike other sectors, agriculture is less attractive because there are no proper strategies that have been put in place to address the concerns of the sector. From the literature above, retention and attraction challenges in the agriculture sector come from the unattractiveness of the industry that makes it difficult to have enough people willing to work in the sector. To address these challenges and ensure that the sector is attractive, there is a need to plan for human resource processes that will ensure people are joining institutions and training to graduate in the field of agriculture. Further, there is a need to put mechanisms in place that will ensure the sector is attractive to make people pursue relevant
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 9 courses in college. This is because addressing the challenges has to begin by addressing stereotypes and attitudes that people have towards certain jobs in the society (Mosley, 2007). Once the attitude has been changed, it becomes easy for the labour market to be attracted to jobs in that line. Further, agricultural sector organizations have to put measures in place to address work-related challenges that people who work in the industry face. Therefore, despite the fact that the agriculture sector faces attraction and retention challenges, there are possibilities of making the sector more attractive by putting measures in place that address attraction and retention challenges in the organization. Therefore, this calls for an organizational turn around to make the sector more attractive so that it can attract the young people who are joining colleges to pursue agriculture-related courses. Once people can predict their career in the agriculture sector, it becomes easy to address attraction and retention challenges that the sector faces.
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 10 References Afiouni, F. (2013). Human capital management: a new name for HRM?International Journl of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 18-34. Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society.Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451-474. Becker, K., Hyland, P., & Sooay, C. (2013). Labour attraction and retention in rural and remote queensland communities.Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 19(3), 342-269. CanadianAgriculturalHumanResourceCouncil. (2009).Labour market information on recruitment and retention in primary agriculture.Canadi. Gates, S., & Langevin, P. (2010). Human capital measures, strategy, and performance: HR managers’ perceptions.Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(1), 111-132. Hutchings, K., De-Cier, H., & Shea, T. (2011). Employee attraction and retention in Australian resource sector.Journal of Industrial Relations, 1-36. Kraimer, M., Seibert, S., Wayne, S., Liden, R., & Bravo, J. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: The critical role of career opportunities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 485-500. Kramar, R., Bartram, T., De Cieri, H., Noe, R., Hollenbeck, J., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. (2014). Human resource management in Australia – Strategy, people, performance.North Ryde: McGraw-Hill. Kucherov, D., & Zavyalova, E. (2012). HRD practices and talent management in the companies with the employer brand.European Journal of Training and Development, 36(1), 86-104.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Employee Retention and Attraction in the Agriculture Sector 11 Miles, R. L., Rolfe, J., & Noonan, S. (2006). The Attraction and Retention of Professionals to Regional Areas.Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 12(2), 129-152. Mosley, R. (2007). Customer experience, organisational culture and the employer brand.Journal of Brand Management, 15(2), 123-134. Noe, R. (2010).Employee Training and Development .New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Onah, F. O., & Anikwe, O. S. (2016). The Task of Attraction and Retention of Academic Staff in Nigerian Universities.Journal of Management and Strategy, 7(2), 10-22. Pauwe, J., (2004).HRM and Performance: Unique Approaches for Achieving Long Term Viability.Oxford: Oxford University Press. Perla, M. E., Iman, E., Campos, L., Perkins, A., Liebman, A. K., Miller, M. E., . . . Karr, C. J. (2015). Agricultural Occupational Health and Safety Perspectives Among Latino- American Youth.Journal of Agromedicine, 20(2), 167-177.