Compare and contrast higher education systems in England and Finland
Verified
Added on 2023/01/05
|9
|3002
|94
AI Summary
This essay compares and contrasts the higher education systems in England and Finland in terms of funding and quality. It discusses the structure and stages of education, funding sources, regulatory bodies, and the overall quality of education. The conclusion evaluates which system is preferable based on the analysis.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Name: Lecturer name: This is your English for Academic Purposes Online Portfolio. Please save a copy on your computer and back it up regularly (e.g. by saving it on your computer / in the cloud on Google Drive / emailing it to yourself). At the end of this course, you need to submit this electronic copy via Moodle Portal Please refer to suggested word counts for each task included within in this portfolio. Assessed Learning Outcomes (LOs): 1.Produce cohesive and coherent elements of academic writing 2.Read, compare and summarise written academic texts SECTION 1: Portfolio Evidence 1 Self-evaluation checklist Below is a list of the skills you will need in university when working on extended pieces of writing. The work you do on the EAP course will help you develop these skills. Tick the 1|Page
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
appropriate box for each skill, according to how well you think you can do this at the beginning of this course. Look again at the checklist throughout the course in order to identify areas for independent study. SkillsDo not know about this Find this difficult/ can’t do this Can partially do this Can do this well Looking for information Identify which books/journals/websites to use☐☐☐☐ Select relevant parts of a text☐☐☐☐ Using sources Acknowledge sources of information☐☐☐☐ Avoid plagiarism☐☐☐☐ Planning/ writing Brainstorm ideas☐☐☐☐ Plan written work☐☐☐☐ Link ideas effectively☐☐☐☐ Paraphrase & summarise ideas☐☐☐☐ Write an introduction☐☐☐☐ Write a conclusion☐☐☐☐ Personal study Work independently☐☐☐☐ Manage my time☐☐☐☐ Oral presentation Discuss written work in a tutorial☐☐☐☐ IT Access the internet☐☐☐☐ Use search engines☐☐☐☐ Create word documents☐☐☐☐ 2|Page
SECTION 2: Portfolio Evidence 2 Outline (suggested word count: 200) An outline is a map of the main ideas included in your essay. You do not need to write full sentences, just notes of the main points that you are going to write in each paragraph of your essay, along with the references. Title: Impact of employee motivation over the business growth and success. IntroductionBackground Information: Employee motivation is a key indicator of business productivity and its performance. Thus, it is required for management to pay their maximum attention towards such and implement different strategies so that target objectives could be achieved easily. In this, one of the easiest way is to fulfill needs and expectations of employees by providing them all the facilities. Thesis statement: To analyze the influence of employee motivation over the success and growth of an organization. Main body paragraph 1 Topic sentence: The requirement of employee motivation in business. Supporting details: Employee motivation is considered as most imperative matter within an organization which provides direct contribution in business success. For this management can fulfill wants, desires and requirements of their employees by providing them rewards and benefits. These kind of practices are essential because through this, organization can improve productivity of their employees and can attain their objectives within 3|Page
target duration. Main body paragraph 2: Topic sentence: Required measures for growth and success of firm. Supporting details: For an organization, it is required to find important measures that can assist them in attain desired business growth and success. These measures can be, employee performance, quality of products, market share, customer loyalty and so on. Conclusion:Summary of main points: On the basis of above scenario, it has been summarized that a firm need to implement appropriate strategy of employee motivation that can assist them business growth success. Recommendations/suggestions: For an organization, it is required to analyze basic needs of their employees for its appropriate fulfillment. Organization needs to provide job security to their customers. It is needed to provide timely appreciations and rewards to employees. Reference List: Lăzăroiu, G., 2015. Employee motivation and job performance. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations. (14). pp.97-102. Conrad, D., Ghosh, A. and Isaacson, M., 2015. Employee motivation factors. International Journal of Public Leadership. 4|Page
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
SECTION 3: Portfolio Evidence 3 Summarising (suggested word count, 100 including notes) Question:What are the similarities and differences between universities in England and Finland in relation to tuition fees? Notes (Text 1):Notes (Text 2): University in Finland: University of Turku Aalto University Tampere University University of Oulu LUT University Universities in England University of Edinburgh King's College London University of Manchester University of Oxford UCL or University College of London What are the similarities and differences between universities in England and Finland in relation to tuition fees? Difference: In England, there is strong hierarchy in education system whereas in Finland, no strong hierarchy followed by schools. The study in England is majorly focuses on test preparation as well as lifelong things but in Finland study is all about lifelong things and success. Similarity: Main objective of education system in both England and Finland is to improve provide higher and success education for their future career growth. 5|Page
SECTION 4: Portfolio Evidence 4 Paragraph structure (suggested word count, 300 including notes) Topic: Importance of effective policies and norms in education system for the development of students. Item A:Policies and norms in education system UK’s education system is divided in four main parts as: primary education,secondaryeducation,furthereducationandhigher education. According to the UK law, it is compulsory for all children to get full time education as compulsory basis between the age of 5 and 16. These kind of policies and norms helps in maximizing literacy level in the country. To provide appropriate schooling to the child, parents can opt any of the option. In this regard they manage some packages that aimed to increase parental choice and thereby enhance the accountability of the state funded schools. These school funding are more closely linked to the enrolment number of students that gives an incentive to admit more students in the school. A good education is a choiceofparentbutinthisgovernmentofUKprovidesown contribution in direct and indirect manner. Item B:Importance of policies and norms in the student’s development In order to manager all the activities in positive manner, government of UK introduces several policies and norms in educational field. All these strict policies and norms belongs to each and every individual of the country. As government of UK determine that in UK each and every individual who belongs to age of 5 to 16 should take education on compulsory basis. These kind of actions of government helps in generatingliteracylevelinthecountrythatassistinmanaging maximum opportunities for employment. Concluding remarks: On the basis of above analysis, it has been analyzed that government of a country requires to construct strict rules and regulations in the context of education system so that they can maximize higher literacy. These kind of practices will help them in future in generating maximum employment and success path easily. In order to enhance parental choice towards education system, policy-makers also needs to endeavored to improve the information offered to parents about the effectiveness of schools. SECTION 5: Academic Writing (750 words) Essay Title: 6|Page
Compare and contrast the higher education system in England with that of a chosen country in terms of funding and quality, concluding with which system is preferable? 7|Page INTRODUCTION Each and every country follows its own rules and regulation for different industries but in education system main objective of government is based on its higher promotion in order to develop literacy level. The education system of UK is valued in all over the world. Main reason behind is to the policies of government as well as a level of study. On the other hand, government of Finland is also paying their maximum attention towards its effective development due to this, Finland is recognizing for top world education system since 2000. MAIN BODY Higher education system in England is worldwide famous for their structure, high standards and quality maintenance (Brooks and Abrahams, 2018). They include five stages of education: early years, primary years, secondary years, further education and higher education. In UK, there is no hard difference in between colleges and universities, they both are same in the UK education system. Further the major difference which differentiate the colleges and universities is collages are prepared students for further education(FE) and for earning degree, in universities, students are getting prepared for higher education and where they finally get the degree (Farini and Scollan, 2019). Higher education system received funding from the public and private sources. From 2012, higher education of England, receives funding from tuition fees and this depends on the different collages. The Office of students is responsible for arranging the funds from the different public and private sources (Harrison, 2018). These office is based on the allocation provided by the government. Office of Students are established under the Higher Education and Research act 2017 and now it’s plays a regulator of higher education in England. Major funds are arranged by Recurrent funding for teachers, grants, and knowledge exchange (Miller and Callender, 2019). The Quality Assurance Agency for higher education, is the main body who regulate the external evaluation of the higher education in England (Murphy, Scott-Clayton and Wyness, 2017). They set the rules, standard and quality code of conduct which are associated with the higher education system in the UK. That rules are voluntary codes by setting up the roles that what they require to complete, what actually the internal management wants from each other’s and the general public expectation from the universities and colleges. A student gets the highest quality of teaching staff and backup studies data from the regular assessments. England higher education system is considered as the best education system across the United Kingdom (Saiti, Abbott and Middlewood, 2018). In Finland the higher education system are private legal entities which provides quality education with the help of financial aids received from internal and external sources (Dervin, 2015). The main funding is received from the state government. The parliament of the state decides and allocates funds in the form of annual budgets. Funding is distributed on the basis of key areas and funding models developed by the universities. The main objective of these model is to enhance the quality, impact and optimization of resources for productivity and development of the higher education programs. These funding is further diversified based on the performance in education, research and development. It is also based on the framed strategies formulated between the Ministry and available higher education institutions (Korhonen and Rautopuro, 2019). The Ministry plays an important role in sanctioning funds for this sector. The sector also receives financial aids from various private institutions and groups. These external funding sources are consisting of The Finnish Funding Agency for innovation, The Academy of Finland, the European Union, enterprises and other international sources (Kosunen and Carrasco, 2016). This funding is achieved successfully with the help of set objectives and guidelines predetermined by the Ministry. For this universities need to provide authentic information about functional results and financial statements. They are responsible to provide data for the evaluation of results in response to the set targets and standards. This core information has to be submitted with the Ministry for monitoring, evaluation and controlling requirements in time. It is consisting of statistical view of the development in education and research areas (Ursin, 2019).Thus, it helps in quality management and optimization of financial resources to the education sector. Students are provided extra facilities such as housing allowances on the basis of their respective income groups. Also, tuition fees are waved for international students in various collaborated programs. CONCLUSION On the basis of above analysis, it has been summarized that in terms of quality and fund related practices Finland recognize as appropriate country. Furthermore, this country has been focusing on improving its education system year by year to meet the standards. On the other side, England also has a great education system and policies thus both countries are stand on the top for their own qualities in the world. REFERENCES Brooks, R. and Abrahams, J., 2018. Higher education students as consumers? Evidence from England. Dervin, F., 2015. Country ‘Hyper-branding’andi the Internationalization of Higher Education in Finland: Is the (R) evolution of Interculturality Coming?.Educational Practice and Theory.37(2). pp.25-49. Farini, F. and Scollan, A.M., 2019. A hope to trust. Educational leadership to support mature students’ inclusion in higher education: an experience from Surrey, England.International Journal of Leadership in Education.pp.1-26. Harrison, N., 2018. Using the lens of ‘possible selves’ to explore access to higher education: a new conceptual model for practice, policy, and research.Social Sciences.7(10). p.209. Korhonen, V. and Rautopuro, J., 2019. Identifying Problematic Study Progression and “At-Risk” Students in Higher Education in Finland.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research.63(7). pp.1056-1069. Kosunen, S. and Carrasco, A., 2016. Parental preferences in school choice: Comparing reputational hierarchies of schools in Chile and Finland.Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education.46(2). pp.172-193. Miller, P. and Callender, C. eds., 2019.Race, education and educational leadership in England: An integrated analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing. Murphy, R., Scott-Clayton, J. and Wyness, G., 2017.The end of free college in England: implications for quality, enrolments, and equity(No. w23888). National Bureau of Economic Research. Saiti, A., Abbott, I. and Middlewood, D., 2018. University governance: insights from England and Greece.International Journal of Educational Management. Ursin, J., 2019. Higher Education Reforms in Finland: From a Ponderous to a More Agile System?. InHigher Education System Reform(pp. 67-77). Brill Sense.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
SECTION 6: Essay Self Assessment Complete this form before you submit your portfolio. Good EvidenceSome EvidenceInsufficient Evidence Essay Structure A. Has a clear structure including an introduction; body paragraphs, conclusion & bibliography ✔ B. Has a clear thesis statement that states their sub topics and position ✔ C. Has clear topic sentences in each main body paragraph ✔ D. Has features of an essay not a report, i.e. no headings, bullet points etc. ✔ Content E. Has compared directlybetween the two countries in each paragraph ✔ F. Has commented on what we learn from the comparisons ✔ G. Has included suitable background information in the introduction ✔ H. Has included a suitable summary and overall comment in the conclusion ✔ I. Has written 750 words (+/- 10%)✔ Use of Sources and Referencing J. Has a minimum of 2 sources per paragraph✔ K. Has in-text citations which follow Harvard style. E.g. (Coughlan, ✔ 8|Page
2014) M. Has avoided plagiarism✔ Use of English N. Writes accurate sentences✔ O. Spells and punctuates accurately✔ P. Uses a range of language✔ Q. Writes in an appropriate academic style ✔ Things you have done well Things you need to improve on 9|Page To complete this project, I have analyzed secondary source of information that provide authentic and relevant information in the context of specific topic. Furthermore, ideas of choosing a topic is by my own understanding as well as from area of my interest. One major aspect that I need to improve is human interaction that creates maximum difficulties for me in gathering primary data.