Estuarine System Dynamics and Human Impact

This assignment delves into the multifaceted dynamics of estuarine systems, examining the interplay between physical, chemical, and biological processes. It analyzes the influence of human activities on these delicate ecosystems, highlighting issues such as pollution, habitat alteration, and climate change. Students are tasked with critically evaluating scientific literature and synthesizing their understanding to address specific questions about estuarine resilience, management strategies, and the consequences of environmental degradation.

Running Head: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Environmental Management for Sustainable Development
Student’s name:
Institution Affiliation:

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Table of Contents
Abstract............................................................................................................................................3
Introduction......................................................................................................................................4
Key Environments.......................................................................................................................5
Key Processes (Council, 2002)....................................................................................................5
Hydraulic Processes.................................................................................................................5
Water Quality Processes..........................................................................................................6
Sedimentary Processes.............................................................................................................6
Ecological Processes................................................................................................................6
Human Usage Processes..........................................................................................................7
The data input..................................................................................................................................7
The SCAPE wave conditions...................................................................................................7
The SCAPE wave levels..........................................................................................................8
Joint Probabilities....................................................................................................................8
Time series Extension..............................................................................................................8
The data output............................................................................................................................8
The relationship between processed, data and key environments...............................................9
Sea-level, no morphological change........................................................................................9
Sea-level, morphological change.............................................................................................9
The advantages of ASMITA model...........................................................................................10
The disadvantages of ASMITA model......................................................................................11
An example ASMITA model.....................................................................................................11
1. There was sediment rule similar to Langstone Harbour..............................................12
1

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Fine deposit conveyed into harbour on inundation tides; coarse sediment moves
seaward to form ebb-tidal delta.............................................................................................12
The Pittwater estuary to sea level rise (2100)................................................................................13
Discussion......................................................................................................................................13
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................15
2

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Abstract
The report is compiled by Pittwater Estuarine System on the Environmental Management for
Sustainable Development. Pittwater is located near the mouth of the Hawkesbury Nepean River
system. The Pittwater waterway focuses on leisure, tourism, business and important
environmental assets (Birch, Gunns, & Olmos, 2015). The Pittwater has various processes that
are geared toward maintaining the system. These methods are divided into hydraulic processes,
physical processes, water quality processes, human usage processes, sedimentary processes and
ecological processes. There are also key environments that affect the system. This report will be
analysing the way ASMITA model relate to the key environments, processes and the data as
ephasised by (Townend et al., 2017). The report is limited to Pittwater Estuarine system in
Australia. Pittwater being a semi-develop tide-ruled suffocated valley estuary is situated around
40 kilometres (25 mi) north of the Sydney focal business locale, New South Wales, Australia;
being one of the waterways that different more prominent Metropolitan Sydney from the Central
Coast.
3

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Introduction
As a person concerned with administration and maintenance of industry, you are expected to
comprehend on the risks involved in complex collaborations between the natural, physical,
social, economic and political part of the organisation. The methodologies involved in this
particular activity are essential for explaining the major natural and maintainability issues
confronting the processes. There is along these lines a need of superior comprehension of the
multidisciplinary interrelationships between reasonable advancement, human wellbeing, and
nature.
Sea course designs impact atmosphere and climate. Researchers have cautioned of the likelihood,
affected by environmental change, of a sudden environmental change. For examples, a sea
streams that could modify the atmosphere in a few areas of the globe is of major concern
(Cooper & Sheets, 2012). Major human ecological effects happen in the more livable districts of
the sea borders – the estuaries, coastline, and bayous. Ten for every penny of the total populace –
around 600 million individuals – live in low-lying regions helpless against ocean level ascent.
Patterns of worry that require administration include over-angling; coral fading because of sea
warming and sea fermentation because of expanding levels of breaking down carbon dioxide,
and ocean level ascent because of environmental change. Helpful procedures include an
administration set aside for ensuring no waste products on the site, statutory control of
overfishing; and maintainable aquaculture and fishing mechanism, depletion of non-renewable
energy source outflows and rebuilding of beachfront and another marine territory Pittwater
Estuarine System (Paalvast & van der Velde, 2014).
4

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Various processes are involved in Pittwater Estuarine System. These processes are focused
toward maintaining the system. The environment at Pittwater is very important especially to the
hosts. Some of the Key environments are discussed below as well as the key processes involved
in the system.
Key Environments
The key Environments in the ASMITA model (Rosigleyse et al., 2016) include;
1. The tidal range (H). The tidal range takes records the range of the tide at a particular time.
Every tide has different range measure.
2. The mean high waters (MHW). The mean high waters record how high the water reaches
during the tide occurrence.
3. The mean low water (MLW). The mean low water takes in the lowest height reached by the
tide.
4. The area at the mean high water represented by (Ab ). The area is the average area covered by
the tide.
5. Vc is the volume of the channel
6. (Vf) is the volume of the flats
Key Processes (Council, 2002)
Hydraulic Processes
The hydraulic process is motivated by the limited capacity of the intertidal tide which increases
into Broken Bay and Brisbane water. The importance of sea wave with respect to the hydraulic
process is by the wave happening at the lower side from the northern end as it is constrained.
Catchment streams to the estuary have no negligible impacts on water-powered procedures on
the estuary, and therefore the stratification forms the negligible impact on the estuary.
5

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality Processes
Water quality processes techniques happening at Pittwater are managed by an extensive grouping
of catchment, oceanic and estuarine systems (Ji, 2016). As a rule, the estuary is overpowered by
tidal inflows and surges, and also commitments inside the catchment from both diffuse and point
foundations. Data exhibits that the water eminence in damp atmosphere conditions has every one
of the reserves of being an issue for shorelines and embayment, mainly from a human prosperity
perception. Litter was routinely detected along the dimension of the foreshore. Noteworthy
locales of litter fuse portions of the southern shore and Carmel Bay.
Sedimentary Processes
Critical parts of the associated sedimentation exhibit are laid out quickly underneath. A sum of
26 disintegrating locales was perceived around Pittwater (Mosher et al., 2017). Evaluation of the
reasons for separating and their comparative reality shows that Boat Wash-down is one of the
essential drivers of disintegrating inside Pittwater. Additional crucial explanations behind
foreshore separating merge draft carried waves, swift releases related with storm-water outlets,
and open riparian entrance to the foreshore. These areas are masterminded in the direction of the
south of Pittwater, where the greater bit of cruising, bay, and business sculling action happens,
which contrasts and the district where tidal flushing isn't as persuading at evacuating
contaminants. Specifically, the range in the south-east of the estuary is strikingly polluted.
Ecological Processes
Ecological Processes that are identified at Pittwater include; Historical clearing of vegetation and
urban change in the incorporating catchment has achieved lifted deposit weights to the estuary
making antagonistic affects estuarine biota, for instance, seagrass. The zones between Mona
Vale and Careel Bay have the best influence on sedimentation inside Pittwater. Sedimentation
6

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
has also inclined wetland domains in Carmel Bay, where it has influenced mangroves to take out
saltmarsh. Storm-water overflow inputs in like manner impression on water quality and estuarine
organic groups.
Human Usage Processes
The human usage processes support the atypical state of water use including a different range of
convoluted recreational exercises, an extensive variety of canoeing exercises and an economic
activity such as fishery. Swipe bays possess twenty-five percent of the conduit, for the most part,
along with the eastern, southwestern and southern shores. There is rivalry among client bunches
for the conduit asset, and subsequently, some contention exists between these gatherings.
The data input
In the ASMITA model, there are various input data involved in this process. These include;
1. SCAPE wave conditions
2. SCAPE water levels
3. Joint probabilities
4. Time series extension
The SCAPE wave conditions
These conditions is projected by the utilisation of the numerical model HANDWAVE. This
specific model conjectures the wave development by the under breeze activity, and it requires
data on measured breezes and the get over which the tide was produced. The SCAPE wave
condition is investigated concerning both the seaward wave conditions and furthermore the close
shore wave conditions (Kozlovsky & Grobman, 2017).
7

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
The SCAPE wave levels
The water levels are used as input data by the ASMITA demonstrates. Wallingford evaluated the
water levels through a ten year of successive hourly water level data which was recorded. The
extraordinary esteem were determined by the utilisation of another strategy by Dixon together
with Tawh.
Joint Probabilities
The approach of this input data is to permit the mix of the outrageous water level expectations
with extraordinary wave forecasts to infer general extraordinary ocean conditions with given
joint return periods. The water level and the wave are used to partner with the date and time
which at that point makes the time arrangement input.
Time series Extension
This sort input was required for the turn-up phase of morphological demonstrating. In the
estimation of this sort of contribution, there is the aggregation of sets of long stretches of the
output data portraying coupled waves and water levels. A long time series are the created by
haphazardly testing complete time structures.
The data output
The data output received from the ASMITA model should use by the management team to
predict the future of the estuary. In a position where a coupled system model has been used, an
extensive number of yield data is used as a consolidated turn-up period. The consequent
parameters are isolated into two classes which join; float and estuary (Duong et al., 2017). Those
parameters related with a float are; shoreline volumes, shoreline position, and withdraw rates,
8

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
volumes of sand, residue transport rates, offshore levels and width of intertidal zones; Estuary
parameters join; water volumes, residue volumes and surface locales of channels delta.
The relationship between processed, data and key environments
The relationship is described by the chart below
Sea-level, no morphological change
 The channel volume increment as the channel range increments.
 The level volume increments as the level range increments
 Therefore, the tidal crystal increments
 Equilibrium volumes and the ranges are the extents to tidal crystal and in this way
increment. Real ranges and volumes are too little and attempt to increment to achieve
harmony
 Channel region increments by supplanting the level zone at bringing down water. Level
region increments by disintegration at high water
Sea-level, morphological change
 Channel volume and region don't change as gradual addition matches ocean level ascent
9

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
 Flat size and area don't change
 Tidal crystal does not change
 Equilibrium volumes and territories don't change, so genuine amounts are near harmony,
and no further change is activated
 If the gradual addition is more noteworthy than ocean level ascent, the crystal is
diminished, harmony volumes decline and real volumes reduction to take after balance
(Harrison et al., 2017).
The advantages of ASMITA model
1. A very vital importance of ASMITA model is that it can perform a sensitivity analysis and
make robust predictions of the future of an estuary.
2. This robust prediction helps the management to develop a risk mitigation plan for protecting
the estuary.
3. An estuary management team can use ASMITA model to develop a management plan for the
estuary.
4. ASMITA model can help the management team to budget on the Estuary through prediction
of its behaviours.
5. ASMITA model can establish the relationship between the element state and tidal prism.
6. ASMITA model can help in describing the evolution of tidal inlet systems in the direction of
equilibrium.
10

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
The disadvantages of ASMITA model
1. ASMITA can produce wrong readings because it depends on variables which depend on
human accuracy. The measurement of flat volume and channel and intertidal areas depends
on other instruments. In this case, if those measurements are done incorrectly, they will lead
inconsequential incorrect results from the ASMITA hence the wrong prediction.
2. ASMITA cannot be depended onto 100% prediction level. ASMITA predicts on long-term
evolution but does not give a correct prediction for short-term evolution.
3. For accuracy purposes, there is a need to incorporate more than one model while using
ASMITA model to compare the results and hence to validate its accuracy. This coupling is
very costly.
4. When using ASMITA modelling, there is a need for the constraint to standard schematization
as opposed to when using behaviour-oriented modelling.
An example ASMITA model
There are not less than 170 estuaries with various characteristics in the United Kingdom. Most of
those estuaries have some forms that would need protection since there are major sites for
various species of animals such as birds (Robins et al., 2016). It also offers recreational activities
such as sailing, walking fishing. These estuaries also provide economic benefits to the UK such
as ports, fishing dregs. It’s vital to be in a position to predict how these estuaries might change in
days to come to manage them. The United Kingdom applied the ASMITA Model to forecast the
extreme rates of sea-level escalation that can occur earlier the intertidal areas are lost totally.
The ASMITA model had been used to represent the estuaries as a succession of morphological
features. In this case, every element develops in the direction of an empirically resulting
steadiness volume and relate to the neighbouring elements by residue exchange.
11

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
The estuaries results in the UK
Humber Estuary
1. There was high deposit stream from Holderness crag or cliff wearing away
2. Elevated bulk for residue transportation
3. Comparatively big intertidal zone
4. Morphological in steadiness with sea-level growth
The Dart Estuary
1. There is morphology-controlled by rigid rock geology of area
2. Partial residue stream
3. There were minor areas of intertidal mudflats and salt swamplands
4. In symmetry with sea-level rise and deposit supply on time-scale of concentration
Chichester Harbour
1. There was sediment rule related to Langstone Harbour
2. Widespread intertidal parts
3. Ebb-tidal delta examined for gravel
4. Component volumes incline in the direction of Equilibrium
The Langstone Harbour
1. Fine deposit conveyed into the harbour on inundation tides; rough residue moves seaward to
arrange an ebb-tidal delta
2. There were widespread salt marshlands and also mud flats
3. Component volumes diverse above the study period, but incline in the direction of
equilibrium.
12

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
The Pittwater estuary to sea level rise (2100).
When the offshore levels increase up to 2100, they are considered as the high range ocean level
situation (Minobe et al., 2017). When establishing the strength of the ASMITA tool, this level
should be considered in sitting structures. As expressed earlier, a lot of thinking should be given
to the wave run-up level for structures sited on the front hill. As indicated by the recommended
predictability group, the seaward breeze speed is; 2100+10, such changes in wind speed would
majorly affect supporting stacking of the ASMITA tool.
Concerning spiral waves, in getting reduced environments, the expansion in size is correctly
corresponding to the increment in wind speed. That is, an expansion in the spiral speed of 10%
would build wind wave sizes by 10%. Such expanded wave sizes may affect the outline of
beachfront structures, however, for seaside arranging in Clarence, the significant impact would
be in expanded wave setup and wave run-up. For even the most prominent 100-year ARI (1%
AEP) wind wave case, the extra wave setup because of expansion in wave size in wave height of
10% would be 0.04m, which is the determination of the computation, and would be sufficiently
secured by the received plan freeboard of 0.3m. Fundamentally, shoreline confront run-up for the
most outrageous breeze wave we would increment by approximately 0.1 m for expansion in
wave stature of 10%
Discussion
In a position to develop a considerate plan to conserve the environment at Pittwater, there is the
need to predict the future of the Estuary. The potential impacts affecting the viability of the
estuary were addressed to preserve life and tourist attraction site. The ASMITA model was used
to predict the future of the Estuary by considering various inputs and delivering output
consequentially. Improved predictions through the ASMITA model can be accredited both to
13

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
excruciating the surfaces into upper and lower features and with exchange between the lower
surfaces and open sea at Pittwater.
The roles and responsibilities are not well-integrated into the sites. This lack of integration
means that there is no effective management at Pittwater estuary. To sustain the good
environment, all the bodies need to agree upon the way forward. It is very significant that all the
prevailing departments be conscious of their role (Marria et al., 2014). For instance, if the
security does not understand their role, there will be a conflict between the community and the
works of the estuary.
There is indigenous heritage value at the estuary. The community at the estuary relies on the
estuary to provide natural resources such as coastal food. There is a need to protect the coastal
animals from extinct by the management of the estuary.
Throughout the area, there are sites that such as axe-grinding trenches, cave art spots and rock
carvings which would act as tourist attraction sites. These sites ought to be protected against the
harmful effects.
On the part of the non-indigenous traditional sites at the estuary, there are some sites in place of
subjects that range from the erected surroundings to site objects to the archaeological things and
heritage management areas.
To develop a considerate position of the non-indigenous traditional sites which are associated
with the waterway, the possible impacts which distress the viability of the sites need to be
addressed. All the possible heritage sites which would, in turn, bring profits to the community at
Pittwater need to be identified, listed and preserved to ensure a sustainable environment.
14

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Conclusion
Human usage processes have been identified as one of the major processes. The investigation
done by human use and activities to both water and land activities has identified the possible user
and conservational conflicts (Lowe et al., 2014). These activities threaten the sustainability of the
good environment. Native and non-indigenous traditional sites and objects have been recorded
and defined where necessary by the Pittwater council. However, there is a need to survey more
and identify if there are more left out.
The Pittwater Council officers should identify any strategic processes that threaten the
sustainability of the environment. However, there has been a range of conflict that has been
identified which aims at reducing the value of entertaining know-hows but also have a likely
threat to the environmental processes. The management of the Pittwater has described the
conflicts to increase in peak periods.
Car parking is a major restrictive factor to the growing of Pittwater as it is required for numerous
users. However, progress and land use neighboring the waterway comprises of uptown, national
park, recreational and reserves is a major conflict to Pittwater expansion.
It is important that the sites; particular and collective impacts on the values of the traditional site
are well-thought-out when assessing development associated with the waterway. There is the
need to appropriately distinguish natural heritages at the Pittwater to adequately protect and
conserve them
15

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
References
Birch, G, Gunns, T, & Olmos, M 2015, 'Sediment-bound metals as indicators of anthropogenic
change in estuarine environments', Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 101, pp. 243-257. Available
from: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.056. [16 October 2017].
Cooper, J, & Sheets, P 2012, 'Introduction: Learning to Live with the Dangers of Sudden
Environmental Change', in Surviving Sudden Environmental Change : Answers from
Archaeology, University Press of Colorado, Boulder, p. 1.
Duong, TM, Ranasinghe, R, Thatcher, M, Mahanama, S, Wang, ZB, Dissanayake, PK, Hemer,
M, Luijendijk, A, Bamunawala, J, Roelvink, D, & Walstra, D 2018, 'Assessing climate change
impacts on the stability of small tidal inlets: Part 2 - Data rich environments', Marine Geology,
vol. 395, pp. 65-81. Available from: 10.1016/j.margeo.2017.09.007. [16 October 2017].
Harrison, SR, Bryan, KR, & Mullarney, JC 2017, 'Observations of morphological change at an
ebb-tidal delta', Marine Geology, vol. 385, pp. 131-145. Available from:
10.1016/j.margeo.2016.12.010. [16 October 2017].
Ji, Z, & Jin, K 2016, 'An integrated environmental model for a surface flow constructed wetland:
Water quality processes', Ecological Engineering, vol. 86, pp. 247-261. Available from:
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.018. [16 October 2017].
Kozlovsky, R, & Grobman, YJ 2017, 'The blue garden: coastal infrastructure as ecologically
enhanced wave-scapes', Landscape Research, vol. 42, no. 5, p. 439. Available from:
10.1080/01426397.2016.1260702. [16 October 2017].
Lowe, CD, Gilbert, AJ, & Mee, LD 2014, 'Human–environment interaction in the Baltic Sea',
Marine Policy, vol. 43, pp. 46-54. Available from: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.006. [16 October
2017].
Marria, P, Williams, SJ, & Naim, M 2014, 'Six S: creating an efficient and safer work
environment', Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 25, no. 11/12, pp. 1410-
1428. Available from: 10.1080/14783363.2012.704281. [16 October 2017].
Minobe, S, Terada, M, Qiu, B, & Schneider, N 2017, 'Western Boundary Sea Level: A Theory,
Rule of Thumb, and Application to Climate Models', Journal Of Physical Oceanography, 47, 5,
pp. 957-977, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 16 October 2017.
Mosher, D, Campbell, D, Gardner, J, Piper, D, Chaytor, J, & Rebesco, M 2017, 'The role of
deep-water sedimentary processes in shaping a continental margin: The Northwest Atlantic',
Marine Geology. Available from: 10.1016/j.margeo.2017.08.018. [16 October 2017].
16

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Paalvast, P, & van der Velde, G 2014, 'Long term anthropogenic changes and ecosystem service
consequences in the northern part of the complex Rhine-Meuse estuarine system', Ocean and
Coastal Management, vol. 92, pp. 50-64. Available from: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.02.005. [16
October 2017].
Robins, PE, Skov, MW, Lewis, MJ, Giménez, L, Davies, AG, Malham, SK, Neill, SP,
McDonald, JE, Whitton, TA, Jackson, SE, & Jago, CF 2016, 'Impact of climate change on UK
estuaries: A review of past trends and potential projections', Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf
Science, vol. 169, pp. 119-135. Available from: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.12.016. [16 October 2017].
Rosigleyse C. de, S, Luci C.C., P, & José A., J 2016, 'Estuarine Beaches of the Amazon coast:
Environmental and Recreational Characterization', Journal of Coastal Research, p. 705.
Townend, I, Wang, Z, Stive, M, & Zhou, Z 2016, 'Development and extension of an aggregated
scale model: Part 2 - Extensions to ASMITA', China Ocean Engineering, vol. 30, no. 5, p. 651.
Available from: 10.1007/s13344-016-0042-6. [16 October 2017].
17