This report focuses on the major elements of business decision-making based on a practical case study. It covers the computation of payback period and calculation of NPV for two projects. The analysis highlights the role of financial and non-financial factors in decision-making.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Business Decision Making
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................3 1. Computation of payback period:............................................................................................3 2. Calculation of NPV in project A and B:.................................................................................3 3. Analysis..................................................................................................................................4 CONCLUSION...............................................................................................................................6 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7
INTRODUCTION Decisionmakingiscrucialcomponentofperformanceforbusinessenterprisesand companies. Decisions relying on insight and rational thought could result the business to longer- term prosperity; onother hand, decisions formed on the grounds of faulty logic, irrationality or insufficient data can rapidly putbusinesses out ofcompetition (Yang and Gabrielsson, 2017). The report emphasise on the major elements of business decision-making based on practical case study ofA&B plc. Company is UK's restaurant chain and providing services like dishwashing and software. Report covers comprehensive discussion about NPV, payback period along with financial and non-financial factors' role in decision-making. MAIN BODY 1. Computation of payback period: Project A – Dishwashing Project YearNet cash flowCumulative Cash Flow 13000030000 23500065000 340000105000 460000165000 590000255000 Payback period = 3 + (15000 / 60000 * 12) = 3 + 3 month Project B –Software Project YearNet cash flowCumulative Cash Flow 14000040000 24500085000 350000135000 475000210000 580000290000 Payback period = 3 + (15000 / 75000 * 12)
= 3 + 2.4 month 2. Calculation of NPV in project A and B: Formula:Net Present Value = Cashflow/ (1+i) t - initialinvestment Project A – Dishwashing Project YearCash flowsPVF @ 14% PV of Cash Flows @ 14% 0-1200001-120000 1300000.877192982526315.7894736842 2350000.769467528526931.3634964604 3400000.674971516226998.8606480806 4600000.592080277435524.8166422114 5900000.519368664446743.1797923834 NPV42514.0100528201 Project B –Software Project YearCash FlowsPVF @ 14% PV of Cash Flows @ 14% 0-1500001-150000 1400000.877192982535087.7192982456 2450000.769467528534626.0387811634 3500000.674971516233748.5758101008 4750000.592080277444406.0208027642 5800000.519368664441549.4931487852
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
NPV39417.8478410593 3. Analysis NPV:Net present value, or NPV, ismetric that investors often employ when evaluating existing or future investments. Such approaches can aid to determine whetherreturnson investment is small or higher with respect to a specific project. This approach concentrates on the current value of money relative to the actual returnsofcash result. The reason why NPV is mostly used as a guide for money managers is that thismeasurestime value of capital and makes a clear distinctionbetweentheoriginalupfrontinvestmentandthecurrentrate-of-return.Many financialanalystsfavourthisapproachbecausetherearecertainrecognizedvariables, likepresent value of money (Wambua and Koori, 2018). Key benefit of this method is that it discounts cash-flows to assess the present values of cash-flows. Another benefit of this approach is that this is quick as well as simplest approach. However there is also certain drawback of this method like through this approach is effective only for comparison of project with similar cash-flows and life cycle. As computed in earlier task, NPV of Dishwashing Projectis 42514.010 while Software Project's NPV is 39417.85. Project having maximum NPV is preferred as this imply that project will provide more return on investment. Therefore, Project A will be most feasible project for A&B plc because project A has greater NPV as compere to Project B. Payback Period:The approach of repaying capital spending projects is quite prevalent since it is simpler to determine and fully comprehend. However, this has significant drawbacks and lacks other critical considerations which should be weighed when measuring the economic viability of differentprojects. Major advantage of this method is that this offer a quick review of project's viabilities in terms of how longer it will take to retrieve project's initial capital investment. Further it is simple task to assess a project's payback period. Major drawback of pay-back method is that this does not consider present-value factor of a project. Further effective comparison of two dissimilar and different life cycle. This method onlyfocusesontimeperiodandignoresotherfactorswhichgenerallyaffectsdecision (Ndanyenbah and Zakaria, 2019).
From above computation of Payback period this has been analysed that payback period of Dishwashing Projectis 3 years and 3 months while payback period of Software Projectis 3 + 2.4 month which shows that Software Project will retrieve investment within a shorter period as compere to Dish-washing Project, But here minor difference in payback period. Overall analysis shows that project A will be more viable since result of NPV approach is more preferred due to consideration of time value of money. Thus Project A is more viable as compere to project B. Financial as well as non-financial factors: In practical life, decision-making making is most sensitive and intellectual process which depends on wider array of factors and also influenced by these factors direct or indirect ways. Majorly theses factors are classified as financial and non-financial factors. Financial factors are variables which are effectively quantifiable and easily recognises as compare to non-financial factors. In business terms, major financial factors are business's gross profit, operating profit, net profit, current ratio, debt equity ratio and so on other measurable factors. These factors have great and mostly direct impact on business's decision. Managing personnelmustconsiderthesefactorstoenhancethecreditworthinessandrelevancyof decisions. These factors also act as indicators for managers to find out business issues which are relevant for decision-making. Such factors also provide quick review of business's present performance (Alkaraan, 2017). Non-financialFactorsaregenerallynon-quantifiableinnatureandaffectbusiness decision in indirect ways. Consideration of non-financial factors along with financial factors is very essential for business as to increase the accurateness of decisions. Non-financial factors generally belongs to enterprise's external business environment like economic inflation rate, governmental policies, introduction of new business policies and laws, change in interest rates etc. These factors are beyond the control of managers so impact of these factors on business decision-making is generally non-avoidable but managers have to consider all these factors as to take efficacious decision and prevent future complexities. Effect of these factors may be long- term or for short-run depending on nature, size of business and related aspects (Sinha and Datta, 2020).
CONCLUSION Fromabovestudy-assessmentthishasbeenanalysedthatdecision-makingwithin businessentityessentialandvaluableprocesswhichhelpmanagementtoensure accomplishment of business goals. Under this process managers evaluates each steps to make final decision. There are wide range of techniques which supports managers' decision and also act as guidance for them.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
REFERENCES Books and Journals: Yang, M. and Gabrielsson, P., 2017. Entrepreneurial marketing of international high-tech business-to-business new ventures: A decision-making process perspective.Industrial Marketing Management,64, pp.147-160. Wambua,P.M.andKoori,J.,2018.InvestmentAppraisalTechniquesandFinancial Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Nairobi City County, Kenya. Ndanyenbah, T.Y. and Zakaria, A., 2019. Application of Investment Appraisal Techniques by Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Operators in the Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. Alkaraan, F., 2017. Strategic investment appraisal: multidisciplinary perspectives. InAdvances in Mergers and Acquisitions. Emerald Publishing Limited. Sinha, R. and Datta, M., 2020. Investment Appraisal of Sustainability Projects: An Assortment of Financial Measures. InSocial, Economic, and Environmental Impacts Between Sustainable Financial Systems and Financial Markets(pp. 43-56). IGI Global.