Assessment 3 - Reflective Essay 30% STUDENT COPY Marking Criteria MNG03217: ASSESSMENT 3 - REFLECTIVE ESSAY Leadership in Business Personal Leadership Model
12 Pages3300 Words234 Views
Added on 2020-05-16
About This Document
MNG03217: ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE ESSAY Leadership in Business Personal Leadership Model Harvard MNG03217: Assessment 3 – Reflective Essay 30% STUDENT COPY Marking Criteria MNG03217: Assessment 3 – Reflective Essay 30% NAME: Student ID: Marking Criterion NS P C D HD Identifies and presents the STUDENT’S OWN perspective and position. (7) See Marking Rubric below Presentation: (4) Times New Roman font, 12-point font-
Assessment 3 - Reflective Essay 30% STUDENT COPY Marking Criteria MNG03217: ASSESSMENT 3 - REFLECTIVE ESSAY Leadership in Business Personal Leadership Model
Added on 2020-05-16
ShareRelated Documents
MNG03217: ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE ESSAYLeadership in BusinessPersonal Leadership Model
MNG03217: ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE ESSAYMNG03217: Assessment 3 – Reflective Essay 30%STUDENT COPYMarking CriteriaMNG03217: Assessment 3 – Reflective Essay 30%NAME: Student ID: Marking Criterion NSPCDHDIdentifies and presents the STUDENT’S OWN perspective and position. (6)See Marking Rubric belowIdentifies and assesses key assumptions. (7)See Marking Rubric belowIdentifies and considers the influence of thecontext *. (6)See Marking Rubric belowIdentifies and assesses conclusions, implications and consequences. (7)See Marking Rubric belowPresentation: (4)Times New Roman font, 12-point font-size, 1.5 or double-spaced line spacing, 2.54 cm margins and 1-line spacing between paragraphs. Within +/– 10% of word limit. Demonstrates clear and coherent writing style in first or third person perspective.Demonstrates detailed attention to essay structure, expression, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Provides minimum five (5) references, correctly formatted in-text and in List of References in Harvard style.Grade:Comment:MNG03217: Assignment 3 Marking RubricNot SatisfactoryPassCreditDistinctionHigh Distinction1. Identifies and presents the STUDENT’S OWN perspective and position as it is important to the analysis of the issue. (6)Addresses a single source or view of the argument Identifies own position onthe issue, relative to Identifies, appropriately own position on the Identifies, appropriately, one’s Identifies, appropriately, one’s
MNG03217: ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE ESSAYand fails to clarify the established or presented position relative to one’s own. Fails to establish other critical distinctions.other positions but does not provide supporting evidence for the position.Fails to acknowledge the possible validity of other positions.issue, drawing support from experience, and information from coursematerials.Recognizes that there are other valid points of view. own position on the issue, drawing support from experience, and information available from course materials.Recognizes other valid points of view and counter-arguments thatmay be made. own position on the issue, drawing support from experience, and additional information not available from assigned sources.Recognizes other valid points of view and counter-arguments thatmay be made and responds to them.2. Identifies and assesses the key assumptions. (7)Does not surface the assumptions and ethical issues that underlie the issue, or does so superficially.Identifies some, but not all, of the assumptions that have been made in their analysis. Only superficially considers thevalidity of those assumptions.Identifies the assumptions made in their analysis and considers their validity, yet fails to surface important ethical issues.Identifies the validity of the key assumptions and ethical dimensions that underlie the issue.Identifies and addressesthe validity of the key assumptions and ethicaldimensions that underlie the issue.3. Identifies and considers the influence of the context * on the issue. (6)Discusses the problem only in egocentric or socio-centric terms. Does not present the problem as having connections to other contexts—cultural, political, etc.Recognizes the importance of issues suchas ethical, political and cultural elements related to the task but does not discuss their impact. Recognizes the importance of issues such as ethical, political and cultural elements related to the task and discusses their impact.Analyses the issue considering relevant contexts, but fails to consider one important context.Analyses the issue with a clear sense of scope and context, including an assessment of the audience of the analysis. Considers other pertinent contexts.4. Identifies and assesses conclusions, implications and consequences. (7)Fails to identify conclusions, implications, and consequences of the issue or the key relationships between the other elements of the problem, such as context, implications, assumptions, or data and evidence.Draws incomplete conclusions or considers only some of the consequences of the conclusions. Fails to reconsider assumptions identified earlier. Fails to reflect upon own work. Draws satisfactory conclusions and considers some of the consequences of the conclusions. Reconsiders assumptions identified earlier and reflects uponown work.Identifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and consequences. Partially considers context, assumptions, data, and evidence. Reflects upon their own assertions.Identifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and consequences considering context, assumptions, data, and evidence. Objectively reflects upon their own assertions.5. Formats and presents essay clearly and correctly. (4)
MNG03217: ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE ESSAYIncorrect font, font-size, line spacing, margins and no line spacing between paragraphs. Word count not within +/– 10% of wordlimit. Unclear and incoherent writing style in first or third person perspective. Poor essay structure, expression, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Provides less than five (5) sources, incorrect formatting in-text and in List of References. Does not use Harvard Referencing style correctly.Adequate standard of formatting. Word count iswithin +/– 10% of word limit. Unprofessional writing style in first or third person perspective. Adequate essay structure, expression, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Uses Harvard Referencing style mostly correctly. Provides minimum (5) sources but incorrect formatting in-text and in List of References. Sound standard of formatting. Word count is within +/– 10% of word limit. Mostly clearwriting style in first or third person perspective. Adequate essay structure, expression, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Uses HarvardReferencing style correctly. Provides minimum (5) sources, mostly correct formatting in-text and inList of References. Mostly correct formatting throughout. Within +/– 10% of wordlimit. Coherent writing style in first or third person perspective. Mostly correct essay structure, expression, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Provides minimum five (5) references, correctly formatted in-text and inList of References in Harvard style.Correct formatting throughout. Within +/–10% of word limit. Clear and coherent writing style in first or third person perspective. Detailed attention to essay structure, expression, spelling, punctuation and grammar. Providesminimum five (5) references, correctly formatted in-text and inList of References in Harvard style.*Contexts for considerationCultural/social: Group, national, ethnic behaviour/attitudeScientific: Conceptual, basic science, scientific methodTechnological: Applied science, engineeringPolitical: Organizational or governmentalEducational: Schooling, formal trainingEconomic: Trade, business concerns, costsEthical: ValuesPersonal Experience: Personal observation, informal character
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.