Essay on Psychological Contract 2022

Running Head: ESSAY ON PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT
Essay on psychological Contract
Student’s Name
University Name
Author’s Note

2
ESSAY ON PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT
Introduction
This essay is intended to make a thorough analysis of the necessity of psychological contract and
determination of its effectiveness towards Human Resource Management. This will further
analyse the various aspects of integrated recruitment as well as reward strategy. The influence of
this strategy in terms of strengthening psychological contract within the Australian Defence
Force will also be analysed in the course of this essay.
Discussion
HR departments of modern organizations find the psychological contract to be increasing their
interest. The psychological contract has been used as a measuring factor that can impact
workplace behaviour. This essay is developed in regard to specific aspects of psychological
contract which analysis implications on workplace relationship and how it can be applied in a
useful way in organizations (Karagonlar, Eisenberger & Aselage, 2016).
Psychological contract is the best description of business relationship perception existing
between two parties and it has gradually become an interesting topic for The HR community.
The contract that generally exists between employees and employer is referred to here and both
have mutual expectations from one another. It is the impressive Expectations which impacts
behaviour from both ends.
The basic problem regarding psychological contract is that employees have a perception that
their expectation are mostly agreed upon from the end of the management. Naturally, violation of
psychological contract is simply perceived as non fulfillment of those expectations. Wellin
(2016), argues in this contract that often what is said is not implied and vice versa in workplaces.

3
ESSAY ON PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT
This develops hidden assumptions from both sides and naturally results in violation of
psychological contract.
The obvious outcomes of violation of psychological contracts include dissatisfaction among
employees, there demotivation, withdrawal and in most instances where underperformance. This
is where the employees start developing the idea of leaving the organisation. On the other hand
when the employees perceive that their psychological contract have been fulfilled by the
employers, they exhibit a different dimension in their performance, reflect job satisfaction and
remain loyal towards a company.
For evidence when an employee works for extra hours every day and goes that extra mile in
order to to provide best output for the customer he or she would naturally develop and
expectation in the first place for a quicker promotion. Now when he or she observed that a
colleague is being promoted quicker than him or her, this would be perceived as a violation of
psychological contract and you would be accounted as non-fulfillment of the expectation
(Solinger et al. 2016). In many instances it is the kings that the manager of the HR department
was not even aware of this expectations from the end of the employee and had expected that
during the performance appraisal the employee would not keep it implied and other highlight his
Expectations explicitly. Now this is the expectation gap that exists between the employee and the
employer and could account for lowering the effort of the employee in giving that extra bit of
effort since recognisation of the performance gap.
There is significant impact of psychological contract in prestigious workplaces. In the first place
it requires mention that in such instances psychological contract does not make the things easier.
It is already difficult to perceive the impression that is developed in an implied way by the
employee from the end of the employer when both are pertaining into the same culture (Bordia et

4
ESSAY ON PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT
al. 2017). Nevertheless in organizations like defence forces where there is a reign of discipline
and prevalence of Patriotism, psychological contracts developed easily and they are really
influential. In the first place in such organisations, the stakeholders exhibit exceptional loyalty
and discipline in order to fulfill the organisational goals. Besides, they have a passion to occupy
the higher positions so that they can serve the organizational needs in a better way. Such strong
psychological contracts provide an additional layer to the vagueness as well as impressiveness of
the existence of psychological contract itself (Rousseau, Hansen & Tomprou, 2018). This simply
leads to misunderstanding as well as misjudgment.
From the above argument, it can be reflected that there is a reasonable relationship between
psychological contract as well as turnover intentions. It is evident that psychological contracts
are based on the norm of reciprocity and from this argument it can be derived that the employee
will reciprocate the fulfilled promise with loyalty and this will help in lowering the turnover
intentions. Empirical findings regarding turnover intention highlights the attitude of employees
like organisational commitment as well as job satisfaction, which are considered to be the
primary reasons of turnover intention. In this regard it can be highlighted that higher the level of
satisfaction among the employees and organisational commitment that is experienced by
employees, the lower will be the turnover intention (Kiazad, Kraimer & Seibert, 2019). Primary
reasons that the organisations try to achieve a lower turnover intention is to deliver expected
results. Please because the HRM is not intended to induce the factors that are essential to the
Employees when they are developing retention policies but they shift their focus, instead, to the
aspects that are deemed important by the employees like the social atmosphere, the job content
and emphasizes only extrinsic factors related to the work life balance of the employees and
financial rewarding also. In this context should be considered that the employees value the effort