Human Error Essay (Solution)

12 Pages2604 Words312 Views

Added on 2021-02-20

Human Error Essay (Solution)

Added on 2021-02-20

BookmarkRelated Documents

Essay

Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................1Understanding of human errors along with detection and recovery approaches........................1Evaluating of perceptions of unsafe acts....................................................................................2Exceptional evaluation of system approach and person approach supported with relevantexamples. ...................................................................................................................................2Evaluation of system approach....................................................................................................3Critical analysis of rule-based behaviour clearly identifying pros and cons of rule-basedbehaviour .....................................................................................................................................3Appreciation of openness and transparency to manage errors and exceptional knowledge ofapplication of just culture ............................................................................................................4Demonstration of application of knowledge of the process of achieving organizational justice.......................................................................................................................................................4REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................................6

INTRODUCTIONHuman errors is the error which is occurred which not having the intension boy the actoralong with not having the desired by the certain set of rules and regulation. The external observerthat has led the task outside the system in its acceptable limits. For more proper understanding itcan be stated that he there deviation has been taken place without having intension, expectationor any desirability. The report will have the understanding over the human errors detection alongwith recovery approaches. It will also have the inclusion of advantage and disadvantage of rulebased behaviours which have appreciation of openness and transparency to manage the errors.This will help in proper understanding of application of knowledge in the process of achievingthe organizational justice. MAIN BODYUnderstanding of human errors along with detection and recovery approachesHuman errors are most of the time being citied as the causes of accidents when all theremaining factors are being eliminated. It is very difficult task to have the clear definitionregarding the human errors. The more understanding regarding the term can be that the error thathas been taken place when all the planned sequence failed to have achievement over intendedoutcome. These are this error which cannot be totally eliminated the workplace but if the typicalerror can be identified, it can substantially be reduced. As per the traditional point of view humanerror is being an attribution after the fact which is being related to people, tools, task and theoperating environment. The human errors have being regards as the action errors which is furthercategorized as the slips or thinking errors. Such errors have the deliberate actions which can haveadoption of incorrect course of actions. The intensification of human error can be done through “Swiss cheese” model, as per the suggested model there are various internal defences along withatypical condition which are having prevention of disease (Denison, Yan and Butler., 2019).There are many holes in the slices of Swiss cheese which is having the continuous open, closingand reallocation. This make permit for the trajectory accident opportunities. The next is about thehuman factors that have the evolvement in dynamic processing for production and understandinglanguage. This also have the inclusion of context dependency with emergence of through talkswhich can be a one type of discourse (Hillson and Murray-Webster., 2017). The nextidentification is regarding the cognitive failure which has been predicted due to unsafe behaviourans the micro level of accidents among the worker. There are various factor who are leading to1

human errors such as the skill based behaviours without having conscious control. The rulebased behaviours which is being structured by feed forward control. The lack of knowledgeregarding the unfamiliar situations.Evaluating of perceptions of unsafe acts.The explicative model regarding the behaviours of unsafe work to have the revelationover the mechanism which is being contributing behaviours of the individual the workplace. Thehuman error can be viewed with the two ways which can be termed as the person approach andthe system approach. The both models has the error causation along with it gives rise to differentphilosophies of error management. There is importance for understanding these implications forcoping the ever mishaps risk in the clinical practices. The two approaches have the problem offallibility of human that is the person and system approach. In the person approach there is long-standing and widespread approach which is focusing of unsafe acts that is errors ans proceduralviolations. It has been analysing the unsafe acts as arising primarily from aberrant mental processsuch as the inattentiveness, poor motivation negligence and recklessness. This counter measureswill help in reducing the unwanted variation in human behaviour. Followers to have theapproach will tend to have treat error such as moral issues as having the assumption that badthings happen to bad people. On the other hand the system approach is having the fallibility anderrors in human are expected even in the best organized company. In such approachers the errorsare seen as the consequence for the cause (Hillson., 2017). This has the inclusion recurrent errortraps in the organizational workplace and process. As the per the counter measures, there cannotbe nay changes in the human condition but there can be changes in which the human work whichwill turn out the idea of central system defence. . All the technologies which are hazardouspossess barriers as the barriers and safeguards. The situation where the adverse condition takeplace the important note is not about who is blundered, it is about how and why the defencesystem has been failed (awhney, Marks and Black., 2016). Exceptional evaluation of system approach and person approach supported with relevantexamples. Evaluation of person approachHaving the blame over the individual is more satisfying that the targeting the regardinginstitution. Propel in organization are considered to have the capability of understanding betweenthe safe and unsafe mode so the time when to condition turn wrong the individual will be2

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Managing Risk: Understanding Human Errors and Recovery Approaches

|2962

|46

Managing Risk: Human Errors, Recovery Approaches, and Rule-Based Behavior

|13

|2803

|67

Managing Change: Human Fallibility and Just Culture

|10

|2996

|396

Understanding Wolfgang Iser's Phenomenological Approach to Reading

|1713

|114

Managing Risk: Evaluating Human Fallibility and Just Culture at Rolls Royce

|1851

|24

Operations Management By Thomas Cook - Assignment

|13

|4251

|140

Human Error Essay (Solution)