ETHICAL CONSUMERISM: ATTITUDE, REALITY AND THE BEHAVIOURAL GAP

ETHICAL CONSUMERISM: ATTITUDE, REALITY AND THE BEHAVIOURAL GAP
[Student Name]
[Institution Name]

Table of Contents
1 Chapter One: Introduction........................................................................................................4
1.1 Overview...........................................................................................................................4
1.2 Background.......................................................................................................................5
1.2.1 Is ethical consumerism a reality? Do consumers always shop ethically?.................6
1.2.2 In-Depth Analysis of Ethical Consumption, Sustainability.......................................8
1.2.3 How often do ethical consumers buy ethically abided products...............................9
1.2.4 Factors Influencing the Ethical Consumption.........................................................10
1.3 Aims and Objectives.......................................................................................................11
1.4 Research Question...........................................................................................................12
1.5 Significance of Study......................................................................................................12
2 Chapter Two: Literature Review............................................................................................13
2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................13
2.2 Conceptualising Consumer Ethics..................................................................................13
2.3 Consumer Ethics and Religiosity....................................................................................16
2.4 Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making........................................................................17
2.5 Ethical Marketing to Attract Consumers........................................................................19
2.6 Consumer-Brand Relationship........................................................................................21
2.7 Theoretical Framework...................................................................................................23
2.7.1 Neuro-marketing And Human Behaviour...............................................................23
2.7.2 Consumer Ethical Perception..................................................................................24
2.7.3 Consumption as a socio-cultural phenomenon........................................................25
2.8 Evolution of Technologies in Consumer Ethical Decision Making...............................26
2.9 Consumer Ethics as an Integral Part of Business Ethics.................................................28
2.10 Final Considerations – who is an ethical consumer?......................................................29
2.11 Chapter Summary...........................................................................................................31
3 Chapter Three: Methodology.................................................................................................34
3.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................34
3.2 Research Philosophy.......................................................................................................34
3.3 Research Approach.........................................................................................................35
3.4 Research Strategies.........................................................................................................35
3.5 Types of Investigation.....................................................................................................37

3.6 Data Collection Methods................................................................................................38
3.7 Data Analysis..................................................................................................................40
3.8 Sample Size.....................................................................................................................40
3.9 Sampling Methods..........................................................................................................40
3.10 Reliability and Viability..................................................................................................43
3.11 Ethical Consideration......................................................................................................44
3.12 Research Limitations.......................................................................................................45
3.13 Summary.........................................................................................................................46
4 References..............................................................................................................................47

1 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview
Notably, the concept of ethical consumption and/or ethical consumerism is considered the
overall consumer behaviour to buy products, which are produced using a code of ethics and
moral principles. Moreover, this term mainly covers all periods of the life cycle of consumption
from purchase to use and disposal of a product (Gummerus, Liljander, and Sihlman, 2017). The
idea of “ethical” shopping is based on how people prefer buying products, which are
manufactured while giving preference to worldly principles and moral values. For example, it
has been appraised that many people today prefer buying electric cars over conventional motor
vehicles as electric cars are although more expensive. Still, they are eco-friendly, due to which
they are not perilous to environmental sustainability. In a similar way, many individuals also
prefer buying fake leather and fake fur apparel to reduce the extent of animal hunting for the
sake of business. Nonetheless, the notion of eating vegetables instead of meat and the trend of
buying organic cosmetics, which is not tested on animals, has turned out to be a major trend
across the world. In this way, it has become evident
An investigation led by Yoon (2019) further proclaimed that ethical consumption has
turned out to be a social phenomenon that reflects people’s growing concerns of people in
developed countries about the planet’s environmental and social problems. The phenomenon
finds its expression in the increased interest of buyers in the origin and composition of the
purchased product or service, environmental and social conditions of production, social
responsibility of the producer’s company, methods of disposal of goods, and so on (Zollo, 2020).
Ethical consumption is expressed in the deliberate selection of goods and services that have been
produced, processed and delivered in an ethical manner, that is, with minimal harm to people,

their producers, animals and the environment. When consumed ethically, information about
environmental and social properties can significantly impact purchasing decisions.
Apart from this, it also believed that mass media and digital technologies, especially the
Internet, significantly impact ethical consumption popularity. Consumers react sharply to the
information regularly published in the media about corporations that activists have caught in the
use of child labour or environmental pollution. According to Carrington, Zwick, and Neville
(2016), the three most famous reputational scandals involved Adidas, Zara, and/or Primar's
unethical behaviour. These scandals, which received wide publicity in the media, caused a
massive boycott of manufactured goods and forced corporations to change their behaviour and
development strategies. Other than this, it has also been appraised that the dissemination of
information on the Internet also helps raise consumer awareness of the purchased goods and
services’ ethical properties. In this concern, this research aims to focus on the concept of ethical
consumers while assessing the attitude of consumers towards this phenomenon and the reality
behind this entire paradigm. More importantly, this research also focuses on appraising the
behavioural gap, which significantly exists in the notion of ethical consumerism.
1.2 Background
The history of ethical consumption has its origins in consumer societies and consumer
cooperatives, in which people united to protect their consumer interests (Davies and Gutsche,
2016). The term ethical consumption was popularised in the late 20th century. The area of interest
of such communities was mainly the quality of goods, informing consumers about the properties
of goods, product labelling requirements, etc. (Ganglmair-Wooliscroft and Wooliscroft, 2019).
Nonetheless, it is also notable that many people are still unfamiliar with the paradigm of ethical
consumerism. In contrast, few proclaim that only a fraction of people in society gives

consideration to ethical consumption. In this regard, this section of the research will appraise the
entire phenomenon of ethical consumption from three different lenses based on the paradigm of
realism, sustainability, and influence of ethical consumption in society.
1.2.1 Is ethical consumerism a reality? Do consumers always shop ethically?
Since the late 1990s, activism against transnational corporations has begun to escalate
globally. This phenomenon is based on the significance of the impact that such companies’
business practices have on the interests of millions of people, even those who do not work for
these companies and are not consumers of the goods. There is a heightened interest in the
corporate social responsibility of companies in society (Kushwah, Dhir, and Sagar, 2019).
The early 21st century has been marked by an intensification in community activists’
attention to the observance of the rights of workers who produce goods for multinational
corporations in developing countries. Moreover, many companies or their contractors have been
convicted of exploiting labour in sweatshops, using child labour, and harsh working conditions.
The consumer boycott was announced to such companies, thanks to which, in many cases, the
working conditions of the workers were improved (Zollo, et al., 2018).
Recently, a movement of “green consumption” has become prevalent, which is mainly
originated on the impact of the production and use of goods on the environment. This type of
activism consists of selecting goods, the production of which has a minimal impact on the state
of the environment (Zollo, et al., 2018)
In The Global Market as an Ethical System, philosopher and ethicist Yoon (2019)
revealed that every purchase decision contains a moral choice. In this way, it can be articulated
that ethical consumption mainly extends both to the choice of goods and services and to the
choice of companies that provide them. Depending on the buyer’s moral principles, he may pay

attention to various ethical aspects of the company or product. Moreover, Zollo, et al.
(2018) used the following categories when determining the ethics rating of a company or
product:
 Environment
o Environmental reporting; use of atomic energy; impact on climate change; pollution and
toxic substances; reproducible resource use
 Animals:
o Animal testing; industrial livestock production; other animal rights
 People
o Human (local) rights; workers’ rights; management of contractors and suppliers
(respecting workers’ rights in contractor factories); irresponsible marketing; supply of
goods to the armed forces/sale of weapons;
 Politics
o Genetic Engineering; the announced boycott of the company’s products; activity in
politics (lobbying for laws, donations to political parties); anti-social finance (tax
evasion, directors’ salaries too high).
Consumer boycotts are one way of showing consumers’ attitudes towards harmful
business practices of companies (Yoon, 2019). However, such a measure is not always supported
by activists, since a consumer boycott of the company’s goods can lead to a decrease in
production volumes and, as a result, to a reduction in jobs and a deterioration in the economic
situation of the region in which the goods are produced. However, it is also a notable fact that not
all consumers are influenced or stimulated by the notion of ethical consumption. In fact, many
people still are unaware of this term. Kamenidou, et al. (2019) further claimed that ethical

consumption is gaining a higher consideration and value among consumers in the developed
countries only.
1.2.2 In-Depth Analysis of Ethical Consumption, Sustainability
Today, ethical consumption refers to the purchase of goods and services, the production
and consumption of which does not harm people, animals and the environment. In this way, it
can be stated that ethical consumption is a type of consumer behaviour or consumer activism
(Yoon, 2019). The term covers all stages of the life cycle of consumption from purchase to use
and disposal of a product. The idea of “ethical” shopping is based on the principles of “voting
with the rubble”. The fact of purchase is an expression of the consumer’s approval of the seller’s
behaviour.
Hosta and Žabkar (2016) indicated that the concept of ethical consumption is a social
phenomenon that responds to people's growing concerns in developed countries about the
planet’s environmental and social problems. The phenomenon finds its expression in the
increased interest of buyers in the origin and composition of the purchased product or service,
environmental and social conditions of production, social responsibility of the manufacturer’s
company, methods of disposal of goods, and so on. Ethical consumption is expressed in the
deliberate selection of goods and services that have been produced, processed and delivered in an
ethical manner, that is, with minimal harm to people, their producers, animals and the
environment. When consumed ethically, information about environmental and social properties
can significantly impact purchasing decisions (Kamenidou, et al., 2018).
The first principle of ethical consumption is considered not to buy unnecessary things,
which are not sustainable (Zollo, 2020). In History of Things, a critique of overconsumption,
activist Lee, (2017) revealed 70% of things bought in the United States are thrown away within