Ethical Dilemma in Social Work Practice

Running head-EHICAL DILEMMA IN SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE WITH DISABLED PEOPLE
Ethical dilemma in Social work practice with Disabled People
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
Word Count- 1598

Case Study- Ethical dilemma in social work practice with Disabled people1
The Case study chosen for the essay is Article 3, which states the ethical dilemma in
social work practice for Disabled people. The Ethical dilemma in the following case study
states the dilemma that arises due to the social service practice that the young adult with
autism was facing. The dilemma arises because the adult having autism wanted to lead a
normal life like all the other people of his age, but due to the difference in the part of the
acceptance of the society, the life that he was allowed was a restricted one (David Wilkins,
2012). The society provides various rights to such persons with disabilities in order to
safeguard their interests and provide them a normal life. However, the dilemma in the
situation is due to the application and the execution of the legal rights possessed by such a
person. The theory used in this case study to understand the dilemma is the Utilitarian theory,
and the framework is deontology and pragmatism. The primary aim of this study is to
understand the ethical dilemma of the given case study and provide an ethical theory and a
framework that is suitable in determining the right actions leading to the correct decisions.
Further, The ACWA Code of Ethics has been explained to showcase the connection of it with
the following case study.
Deontology is the right combination of practice that that depends upon the nature of
the duty behind the act and not upon its consequence. Deontology is generally used in ethical
values and beliefs that believe like the act and not on its consequences. The most distinctive
attribute of the moral perceptions relating to is that they outline the essential values of justice
—moreover, rights in terms additional than captivating the adequate incomes to encourage
extreme wellness (Heinzelmann, 2018). Accumulation to ethical commencements,
“deontology” is also castoff to denote to ethical philosophies, or ethical rules, at all stages of
simplification (May, 2014). These principles are essential to deontological origins; they
stipulate certain moral and ethical reason that are necessary actions and does not promote
wellness to the maximum. In simple words, deontology depends upon the moral and the
Word Count- 1598

Case Study- Ethical dilemma in social work practice with Disabled people2
ethical views focusing upon the rules for the prohibition of action. It depends upon the rules
in order to determine what actions are right and what actions are wrong. So, upon the
application of the theory upon this case from a deontological perspective, it was right to
pursue the action upon AB. One noteworthy variance amongst the social worker and parents
of AB was their opinion on the worth of daunting penalties on AB. AB’s parents were
unconcerned of police participation, quarreling that AB will not be able to comprehend the
social part of the police, so the involvement of the police officials might not be beneficial and
required for this case. It is argued that society has laid down specific rules and guidelines for
its conduct, so it is the societal problems that can be under control. So from that perspective,
it is necessary to follow the order that can only regulate society and bring wellness to the
people. In that scenario punishing the offender suffering from certain mental imbalance was
the right action despite the consequence that it may bring. So the action of the policemen
shall be pursued.
The utilitarian theory of ethics is based on the actions that would define what is right
and what is wrong. According to this theory, any action is morally acceptable is that they
produce maximum happiness without any suffering. Action is to be considered as morally
and ethically right if they generate maximum happiness and where they produce sadness and
bring sufferings such actions are considered as morally and ethically wrong (Mill, 2016). So
in simple terms, it is the understanding of the philosophy of what is wrong and what is right.
So anything that brings maximum happiness in the society is stated as right as it involves the
happiness of the greater no of people of the society. This theory depends upon the
consequences of an act in order to determine the good action or bad action of that decision.
Jeremy Bentham is the founder of this theory. This theory can be divided into two parts for a
better understanding. First, the value philosophy and second is the theory of right action. The
value theory states that the only thing that is considered treasured is happiness in the lack of
Word Count- 1598