Ethics in ACS: Breach of Ethical Standards by Michael
Verified
Added on 2023/06/15
|6
|1248
|284
AI Summary
This paper defines the ethical standards of ACS with the help of the case study, and discusses the breach of ethical standards by Michael. The paper concludes with a brief conclusion.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: Ethics1 Ethics
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Ethics2 Introduction: The most important element of profession is the requirement of its members to follow code of ethics. In case of ACS, Code of Conduct is developed on the basis of social regulations and standards and it is referred as code of professional conduct. Regulations of this code are applicable on all the members who engaged in the area of information and communications technology (ICT). This code identified 6 core ethical standards and the associated need for professional conduct. Society needs that member of this profession must comply with these values and they must act with responsibility and integrity in all of their professional dealings (ACS, n.d.). This paper defines the ethical standards of ACS with the help of the case study, and lastly paper is concluded with brief conclusion. Ethical standards: In the present case, Michael takes all the credit of the work done by Courtney and she does not receive any credit for her efforts. This paper discusses the ethical standards breached by Michael. Honesty: This standard states that member of this profession must not breach the trust of the public in this profession or the trust of their stakeholders. While taking professional decisions and actions, member must ensure honesty. Number of situations arises during their professional career which seems beneficial for member but in actual it cause some harm to the member. This type of behavior is not accepted in this profession. It is necessary for members to comply with these provisions: Member must not make and rejects if received any offer related to bribery or inducement. Must not mislead the client in context of product and service suitability.
Ethics3 Must distinguish between the professional and personal opinion while providing advice (ACS, 2014). Must provide actual estimates for the projects handle by them. Give credit of the work perform by other person where such credit is due. Must not make any such attempt in which member enhance his own reputation at the expense of the reputation of another person. In the present case, Michael breach this ethical standard because he fails to give credit of the work perform by other person where such credit is due. In other words, he does give credit to the Courtney for the work done by her. Action of Michael is not ethical because his action demotivates the Courtney and also affects her work in future which ultimately cause harm to the company and society. His action also breaches the trust of the public in this profession. He also makes attempt to enhance his own reputation at the expense of the reputation of Courtney, and this attempt is also an unethical action (DSEF, n.d.). Professional development: Memberisalsoobligatedtoensureprofessionaldevelopmentandthiscanbedoneby understanding new technologies, practices and standards related to their profession. Member must ensure that knowledge and actions become example for others and they are delivered to recipients in such a way as it increases their effectiveness not only in present work but also in their future actions. It is necessary for members to comply with these provisions: Members must update their knowledge and skills. Must increase their awareness in context of issues which not affect only affect their profession but also affect their relationship with public.
Ethics4 Must encourage their colleagues, employees, and students to ensure their professional development. In the present case, Michael restricts the professional development of not only Courtney but also of other employees also. As per this standard, it is the duty of Michael to conduct such actions which present good examples before others and encourage them to conduct similar actions, and this duty is not fulfilled by Michael. Professionalism: This industry is new and witnessed rapid change in small period of time. This industry does not have opportunity to evolve over many years and develop its own standards and legislation. ACS is making efforts to improve the confidence of public in this industry. Because of this it is important for the members of the society to maintain professional standards which not only improve and enhance the image of this industry but also contributes in the welfare of society. Every person has right to treated with dignity and respect, and any type of discrimination is considered as unprofessional behavior. Members of this profession must know that ACs help them in resolving the issues and also provide support for taking right decision. It is necessary for members to comply with these provisions: Must take proper and necessary actions against those members who breach this code. Obligations of corporates towards society are stated in this code, and it is the duty of member to make sure that ACS and its officers meet their obligations towards the society. Members must not make any such attempt or influence any person to conduct in nay such operations which result in breach of this code. Membersofthisprofessionmustnotengageinanysuchconductduringtheir professional role which may demeans the image of the profession (Teaching, n.d.).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Ethics5 Members must have pride in their profession, and protect and promote professionalism in ICT. In the present case, Michael demeans the image of the profession by engaging in the unethical conduct and also fails to fulfill his obligations towards the society by breaching this code. As stated above, obligations of corporates towards society are stated in this code, and it is the duty of member to make sure that ACS and its officers meet their obligations towards the society. Therefore, members must comply with each and every standard of this code (Valente, 2014). Conclusion: After considering the above facts, it can be said that this code of conduct states the ethical standards for the members of ACS, and Code of Conduct is developed on the basis of social regulations and standards and it is referred as code of professional conduct.Michael demeans the image of the profession by engaging in the unethical conduct and also fails to fulfill his obligations towards the society by breaching this code.
Ethics6 References: ACS, (2014). ACS Code of Professional Conduct Professional Standards Board Australian Computer Society. Available at: https://www.acs.org.au/content/dam/acs/rules-and-regulations/Code-of-Professional- Conduct_v2.1.pdf. Accessed on 10thFebruary 2018. ACS. ACS Code of Ethics. Available at:https://www.acs.org.au/content/dam/acs/acs- documents/Code-of-Ethics.pdf. Accessed on 10thFebruary 2018. DSEF. Ethical Theories. Available at: http://www.dsef.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/EthicalTheories.pdf. Accessed on 10th February 2018. Teaching. Australian Computer Society Code of Ethics. Available at: http://teaching.csse.uwa.edu.au/units/CITS3200/ethics/acs-ethics.htm.Accessed on 10thFebruary 2018. Valente, L. (2014). 10 Golden Rules To Professional Ethics In The Workplace. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140831053426-77080879-10-golden-rules-to-professional- ethics-in-the-workplace.Accessed on 10thFebruary 2018.