This report examines the corporate governance policies and procedures of Asaleo Care Limited, an ASX listed entity. It analyzes the board composition, orientation, and remuneration structure of the company. The report also evaluates the voluntary disclosures provided by the company and their impact on stakeholders.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Ethics and Governance 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Contents Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................3 Part 1: Introduction.....................................................................................................................................4 Part 2: Summary of Corporate Governance at Asaleo Care Limited............................................................5 Board Independence...............................................................................................................................5 Information from the reports of Chairperson and CEO...........................................................................6 Remuneration report...............................................................................................................................6 Immediate Priorities of the company and actions taken.........................................................................9 Part 3: Board Orientation..........................................................................................................................10 Part 4: Evaluation of communications made by the company through using the legitimacy theory.........12 Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................14 References.................................................................................................................................................15 2
Executive Summary This report is developed for the purpose of examining the corporate governance policies and procedures of an ASX listed entity, that is, Asaleo Care Limited. In this context, it has demonstrated the corporate governance structure of the company by examining the board composition, board orientation and the remuneration structure. It has been identified that the company possess shareholder-agency orientation where Board is directed and controlled by the shareholders and the main focus is to increase the returns from them. However, it develops and provides its voluntary disclosures for promoting communication in relation to its societal and environmental implications and developing a legitimate image in the mind of its stakeholders. 3
Part 1: Introduction The purpose of the report is to conduct a research relating to the significance of voluntary disclosures provided by a publicly listed company relating to its governance and ethical outlook. The businesses are placing increasing importance on providing information about the manner in which they conduct their operational activities for ensuring that they have carried out their diverse functions in an ethical and responsible manner. This is necessary for a company to create a positive image in the mind of different stakeholders of an organization such as customers, suppliers, investors, government and others. This results in achieving a continuous support from the stakeholders and thus supporting the sustainable growth and development of an organization. The investors seeking to invest in companies are placing large emphasis on examining the impact of their different business activities on the society and environment in which they are operating in addition to analyzing their financial position. As such, the voluntary disclosures provided by a company are essential to seek the interests of the investors and promoting its sustainable growth and development by actively seeking support of its different stakeholders. In this context, the report has undertaken an evaluation of the annual report of a selected ASX listed entity for examining its corporate governance structure, orientation of Board and information provided by it in that can lead to legitimizing its operations in the mind of stakeholders. The ASX listed entity selected for the purpose is Asaleo Care Limited, a personal care and hygiene company. It is involved in manufacturing, marketing, and distribution and selling of consumer products related to personal care, hygiene and tissue products. The major consumer products of the company includes facial tissues, paper towels, napkins, tampons, pads and other safety and hygiene products. The company operates within the healthcare sector of Australia and is listed under the ASX. It has the presence of about 11 distribution centers and about five manufacturing sites across Australia, New Zealand and Fiji. The company provides its product to the customers through its extensive distribution network such as retail stores and also to business end users such as schools, restaurants, airports, aged care facilities, hospitals and others. It has been established in the year 1932 by the name of PEPSCA Limited and has then transformed its name to Asaelo Care Limited in the year 2014 (Annual Report, 2018). 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
The reportin thecontextof voluntarydisclosuresprovidedby the companyhas researchedabout thecorporategovernancepoliciesand appliedthe legitimacytheory in regarding to examining the legitimacy of its different activities. The report in general aims to provide the results relating to Board orientation, remuneration report and type of voluntary disclosures provided by the company that helps in illustrating its legitimacy to the stakeholders. As such, it presents an evaluation of the ethical and governance outlook of the selected company through evaluation of its own disclosures and relevant theoretical frameworks that leads to analysis of the impact of the company’s operations on the society and environment. Part 2: Summary of Corporate Governance at Asaleo Care Limited Board Composition of Asaleo Care Limited consists of six directors. The ratio of independent directors to non-independent directors is 1:1 that mean 3 directors are independent and 3 directors are non-independent in the company. It has been found from the below mentioned table that the chairperson of the Board of Asaleo Care Limited, Harry Boon is an independent director (Corporate governance report, 2019). Board Independence The Board comprise of six directors out of which 3 directors are independent. NamePosition Independen t Dateof Appointment Harry BoonIndependent Non-Executive ChairmanYes30/05/2014 Sid Takla ChiefExecutiveofficerandManaging DirectorNo23/10/2018 Mats Berencreutz Non-ExecutiveDirector(nomineeof Essity)No14/03/2014 Sue MorphetIndependent Non-Executive DirectorYes30/05/2014 Robert Sjostrom Non-ExecutiveDirector(nomineeof Essity)No26/04/2016 Joanne StephensonIndependent Non-Executive DirectorYes30/05/2014 (Source: Annual Report, 2018) 5
Information from the reports of Chairperson and CEO It has been analyzed from the Chairperson and CEO report that the company is emphasizing on conducting its operational activities in a safe, ethical and transparent manner. It is continuously focusing on making a positive contribution towards improving the environment and meeting the social needs. In this context, the company places importance on resourcing its products in a sustainable manner. As such, it has complied with the policy of No Deforestation, No peat and No exploitation for protecting the forests form any type of negative impact of its different operations. It has also stained a potion of sustainability leadership in the Down Jones Sustainability Australia Index (DJSI). It promotes social and economic development of the communities’thoroughmakingcharitiesandalsosupportingtheeconomicgrowthand development of its families of framers from which it source its raw materials (Annual Report, 2018). Remuneration report Company is following a fixed remuneration policy for all executive and non-executive directors. Fixed remuneration comprises base salary and superannuation. Variable remuneration is structured to provide executives with competitive performance-based remuneration (Corporate governance report, 2019). Below is the list of directors and key managerial personnel (KMP) 6
(Source: Annual Report, 2018) Asaleo Care Limited has defined some objectives for the group remuneration policy. These objectives are followed by below principles: Remuneration policy should be motivating to pursue company’s long term growth and success. Policyshoulddemonstrateaclearrelationshipbetweenthecompany’soverall performance and the remuneration of senior management. Remuneration policy should be such that aligns interest of executives with the creation of value for shareholders. Complying with all relevant legal and regulatory provisions (Annual Report, 2018) AsaleoCare Limitedhasgivenitsexecutivesremunerationinthree forms- fixed remuneration, cash incentive and equity incentive that can be seen from the below chart: 7
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
(Source: Annual Report, 2018) Below mention is the report of total remuneration of all directors and executives: 8
(Source: Annual Report, 2018) Immediate Priorities of the company and actions taken Asaleo Care Limited’s main priority is to make its business big with economic and social contribution and by giving its employees and stakeholders a safe and secure life. In 2018 a strong and decisive action taken by the Chairperson and CEO is that in July, they announced to undertake an in-depth strategic review of the whole business. Their main aim was to design and implement the most efficient structure and business model for sustainable long term growth and to maximize their return on invested capital with making a positive economic and social contribution. Company renewed its focus on consumers and customers and created new growth opportunities for them. Key retailers of the company have agreed to add company’s new 9
products, as range addition in Tissue and Personal Care categories. Market Share for Feminine Care business stabilized with the investment in trade spends. Company has successfully launched new Tena products, new pants and lights to make their customers life better(Annual Report, 2018). Part 3: Board Orientation The orientation of Board refers to process of providing information regarding the various roles and responsibilities of the Board members. It aims to provide depiction regarding the strategicdirectionandthetypeofrelationshipthatispresentbetweentheboardand management. There are various types of Board Orientation that are used in the context of a companythatareshareholder-agency,shareholder-stewardship,stakeholder-managerial, stakeholder-ethical and resources. The shareholder-agency type of board orientation refers to the presence of high proportion of independent directors within the Board who are installed by the shareholders. The orientation is governed on the basis of theory of agency which has stated that there is presence of a principal, that is shareholders, and the agent, that are the business managers, who governs the working of an entity (Desender, 2009). The Board is appointed by the shareholders and the emphasis is to increase the return for them. This type of orientation of Board adopts the use of communication strategies such as remuneration report, income statement and balance sheet for disclosing the useful information to the stakeholders. The next type of Board Orientation is shareholder-stewardship which has the presenceofgreaterproportionofnon-independentdirectorshavingtheresponsibilityof promoting growth and development of a company (Effross, 2014). The focus of the Board is to promote internal growth of a business and conduct adequate capital management. The major communication strategies used by the Board for depicting the business results includes report of Chairperson’s, balance sheet and cash flows. On the other hand, stakeholder-managerial orientation of Board indicates the presence of majority of independent directors who are mainly appointed for satisfying the needs of most influential stakeholders. The Board mainly develops and publishes voluntary disclosures for meeting the interest of end-users such as investors and other stakeholders. The stakeholder- ethical orientation indicates that majority independent directors reflect the stakeholder’s diversity 10
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
and the Board publishes the voluntary disclosures having focus on CSR. Lastly, the resources orientation refers to the mix of independent and non-independent directors and has an adequate mix of skills and expertise for securing the vital resource flows into the company. The major focus of the Board is to regulate the resources flow by adequate management of capital. The key communication used is providing disclosures regarding the ways adopted by it for securing resources for the company (Zhao, 2011). As analyzed from the above types of Board orientation, it can be said that there is presence of shareholder-agency orientation within Asaelo Care Limited. This is because the Board composition of the company has revealed that it consists ofmainly independent directors appointed by the shareholders for conducting the various operations of the company. The shareholders as such represent the principal who has appointed Board members for conducting the business operations. This type of orientation can be explained adequately by the use of agency theory as per which there is a principal-agent relationship between the shareholders and the business managers. The theory has stated that it is the responsibility of agents to act in the best interests of principal and maximize their interests and welfare (Heracleous, 2010). As such, the shareholder-agency orientation indicates that Board of a company holds the position of agent who acts on the behalf of the shareholders and the major focus is to maximizing the interest of the shareholders. The Board in turn appoints the business managers who are ultimate agent acting for meeting the strategic goals and objectives of the shareholders by promoting the growth and development of the company. The Board aims to reduce the agency cost by aligning the interest of the shareholders as per the business managers with the use of different remuneration plans such as adopting the use of incentives and rewards. The rewards and incentives should be aligned with the long-term performance of the business and thus it helps in reducing the conflict of interest between the two as the business manager’s aims to achieve the strategic goals and priorities provided to them by the Board for maximizing their incentives or rewards and as such increasing their own personal monetary benefits (Rezaee, 2008). The shareholders as such tend to appoint large number of independent directors within Board with the aim of decrease in the stake of managers. The independent directors will act in the best interests of the company by developing ethical policies and guidelines that helps in strengthening corporate governance and thus reducing the possibility of occurrence of any type 11
of unethical practices. The independent nature of Board ensures that its focus on promoting long- termgrowthof thecompanyratherthanmaximizationofpersonalinterestsofbusiness managers. This helps in enhancing the accountability and integrity within business operations and leads in developing a strong governance system (Corporate governance report, 2019). The presence of large number of independent director ensures that Board act in an independent manner and does not have any materialistic interest within company operations. The Board receives its remuneration as per the remuneration policy developed for directors and does not have any stake within company finanacil outcomes. Therefore, it can be said that Board acts a complete neutral in proving direction to the management regarding the ways of conducting different business operations and providing them strategic goals and priorities to be achieved for meeting the interests of the shareholders (Zhao, 2011). Asaleo Care Limited possesses 6 director out which three are independent and thus has maintained a equal proportion between dependent and independent directors. The independent directors are appointed by shareholders and there exist large control by the shareholders over the Board. It can be said that though the company has maintained an equal balance between independent and non-independent directors but the focus is to meet the shareholders needs due to the appointment by the shareholders of Board members. The key communication strategy used by the Board for providing information to the shareholders about the business outcomes ate financial statements and remuneration report. The remuneration reportprovidesdetailsregardingtheremunerationprovidedtothedirectorand business managers for maintaining accountability in the mind of shareholders (Corporate governance report, 2019). Part 4: Evaluation of communications made by the company through using the legitimacy theory In order to evaluate the communication made by Asaleo Care Limited through using the legitimacy theory, it is important to understand the true meaning of legitimacy theory in context of various communication made by the companies. Some of the important communications that are made by companies with regards to prove their legitimacy are financial report, corporate governance report, sustainability report and other specific disclosure pertaining to the specific industry or company (Deegan, 2002). 12
Legitimacy can be applied in various subject matters and it provides anything which is according to the law is acceptable. Legitimacy is often used in context to prove the organization commitment towards to the society and all other stakeholders. In this context, legitimacy has been defined as set of perceptions and assumptions that proves that activities of an entity are appropriate and desirable as per the social norms, definitions, beliefs and values. So as per the legitimacy theory organization must perform the actions and activities that does not harm the values, norms and beliefs of the society. It can be said that legitimacy theory is based on idea that ensure that entity works in boundaries set by the society and entities must provide enough evidence that proves that their actions and activities are legitimate (Milne & Patten, 2002). There are many ways that helps to prove that organization is working as per the legitimate norms such as disclosures made in annual report about the sustainability, corporate governance and all the financial disclosures. Disclosure requirement can differ to according to the requirement of stakeholders and society. Stakeholders are mainly concerned with the financial performance and corporate governance disclosures made by the company but society in which company operates is mainly concerned with sustainability and climate disclosures. As per the Global Reporting Initiative it is important that entities should include all the financial as well as non financial disclosures in the annual report so that stakeholders can make their decisions wisely (Deegan, Rankin & Tobin, 2002). Asaleo Care Limited has made sufficient disclosures to prove its legitimacy and also to prove its concern towards the society it works for. Asaleo Care Limited is highly concerned to the environment and it is clearly seen in its environmental policy. It has been disclosed by the company that its major sustainability goal is to promote the more sustainable organization through using the products and business operations. Asaleo Care Limited has also provided steps it takes to make ensure that all their activities and actions are performed within the context of societal norms, beliefs and perceptions to prove its legitimacy (Environment Policy, 2019). Corporate disclosures have also been made in separate corporate governance statement but there was no detailed disclosures regarding the corporate governance in the annual report of Asaleo Care Limited (Annual Report, 2018). So overall it can be said that company has made enough efforts to make sure that proper communication has been established between stakeholders and company. It is the duty of board of directors to provide the detailed disclosures in annual report and other reports to make the society believes that company is performing its actions under given 13
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
laws and regulations. Overall it can be said that Asaleo Care Limited has been successful in communicating the corporate actions to prove its legitimacy. Conclusion The overall discussion conducted in the report has inferred that Asaleo Care Limited possessastrongcorporategovernancestructurethatemphasizesonconductingbusiness operationsin an ethicalmannerand meetingthe diverseneedsand explanationsof the stakeholders. The orientation of Board reflects that there is high control of the shareholders and focuses on increasing the returns for them. The Board focuses on protecting the interests of the shareholders and the key communications strategy adopted are remuneration report and financial statements. Also, the voluntary disclosures are undertaken by the company for legitimizing its actions in the context of society and environment in which it conducts its operations. 14
References AsaleoCareLimited.(2018).AnnualReport.RetrievedJune1,2019,from https://www.asaleocare.com/investor-relations/company-reports/ Corporate governance report. (2019). Asaleo Care Limited. Retrieved June 1 2019, from http://www.asaleocare.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/ Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures - a theoretical foundation.Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282- 311. Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmentaldisclosuresofBHPfrom1983–1997.Accounting,Auditing& Accountability, 15(3), 312-343. Desender, K. (2009). The relationship between the ownership structure and the role of the board. Retrieved3September,2018,from http://www.business.illinois.edu/Working_Papers/papers/09-0105.pdf Effross, W. (2014).Corporate Governance: Principles and Practice. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. Environment Policy. (2019). Sustainability: Asaleo Care Limited. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from http://www.asaleocare.com/sustainability/environmental-policy/ Heracleous, L. (2010). Rethinking Agency Theory: The View from Law.The Academy of Management Review35(2), pp. 294-314. Milne, M. J., & Patten, D. M. (2002). Securing organizational legitimacy: An experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures.Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 15(3), 372-405. Rezaee, Z. (2008).Corporate Governance and Ethics. US: John Wiley & Sons. 15
Zhao, Y. (2011).Corporate Governance and Directors' Independence. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. 16