Ethics and Code of Conduct Report

This report highlights the importance of ethics and code of conduct in the construction industry through two case studies involving building collapses. It examines the causes of the collapses and the role of unethical behavior. It also discusses best practices and the engineering code of conduct.

Ethics and Code of Conduct 1
ETHICS AND CODES OF CONDUCT REPORT
Student’s Name
Course
Professor
University
City
Date

Ethics and Code of Conduct 2
Table of Contents
1 Executive summary..............................................................................................................3
2 Introduction............................................................................................................................4
3 Case study I...........................................................................................................................4
4 Case study II..........................................................................................................................5
5 Comparison of the Two Cases............................................................................................7
6 Causes of the Collapse of the Buildings............................................................................9
7 Best Contact Practices.......................................................................................................10
8 Conclusion............................................................................................................................11
9 References:..........................................................................................................................12

Ethics and Code of Conduct 3
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Construction works require the constructors to possess the required expertise and
experience to deliver top results. There are strict rules and code of ethics by which they are
expected to abide and comply during the time they serve at different stations. The code of
conduct and the rules they are to abide by are to keep the professional ethical and ensure that
their behavior is not alarming to the profession. However, when they engage in some unethical
behaviors, it becomes difficult to construct standard structures. There are some rules and
punitive measures that are laid down by the professional bodies that oversee this profession.
The purpose of this report to show the importance of ethics as it relates to performance and
execution of duty by the professionals. The current report details two case studies involving the
collapse of two buildings under different circumstances. The first case study involves the
collapse of the building because of the renovation activities that were ongoing by the time it
collapsed. The report will be examining the issues that were neglected and what led to the
collapse of the building. The second case involves the collapse of a building because of the
construction work that was going on next to the building as well as the shaking of the building
before it collapsed. A comparison of the two case studies has been done in order to ascertain
the presence of unethical behaviors of the constructors. Engineering code of conduct has been
focused to shade light on the required conduct by the constructors and what they ought to have
been done to avoid the incidences.

Ethics and Code of Conduct 4
2 INTRODUCTION
Engineers are required to have values and principles that guide the decisions they make
in their engineering practices. This values and principles are the only hope that the profession
has in ensuring sanity and professionalism in the profession. There are men and women who
have committed themselves to this values and principles and have made the profession to be
better in many ways. Failure to observe these principles can lead to the destruction and loss of
many lives which could have been saved were the principles and values followed to the latter.
There are several ways through which engineers can engage in unethical behaviors in their line
of duties which is dangerous to them and the lives of many other innocent and unsuspecting
people. First, there is the deliberate and intentional use of substandard materials during
construction has been argued as one of the most dangerous acts by the constructors. Over the
years there have been cases of such ignorance and the consequences have been dire for many
people. Many engineers engage in this act because of corruption issues related to saving
money initially proposed for construction of a standard building. Some of the reasons why they
engage in the corruption and deliberate mismanagement of funds might somewhat sound
reasonable to someone but there are codes of ethics and standards that must be adhered to by
all. Instead of buying standard materials, some constructors buy substandard materials,
something that leads to a poorly built building (Kultgen, 2010). When the materials for
construction are not bought in the right proportion, then the construction will have anomalies
that will in future result to accidents and also the loss of innocent unsuspecting lives. In addition,
failure to follow the required guidelines can also lead to the construction of substandard
buildings. This report focuses on the two case studies that form the basis of ethics and code of
conduct by the engineers.
3 CASE STUDY I
The case involved Heritage-listed building that collapsed in Fremantle after renovation
activities were initiated. For many people who knew the building or have heard of it, the incident
was not something to smile about. However, no casualties were reported from the incident and
that was a good thing indeed. There were loud crashes heard before the building collapsed. The
members of the public called emergency services to the scene to come look at what was
happening perhaps with the hope of saving something in that horrible scene. The entire building
had shifted while the internal levels collapsed. In fact, it was reported that the collapse of the
building caused structural damage of the neighboring building (Sunday Times, 2018). During the
collapse time, there were some renovation works going on in the basement of the building.

Ethics and Code of Conduct 5
It is apparent that there was a problem with the renovation activities that led to the
collapse of the building. This is arguably true because the building was stable before the
renovation activities kicked off. There are different causes of the collapse of the building related
to the renovation activities. In this regard, the renovation engineers need to have prior
knowledge of the condition of the building before they commence the renovation work (Sunday
Times, 2018). In addition, apart from knowing the condition of the building, the engineers need
to have the right tools and material for the renovation work. For instance, if the renovation work
entails some drilling activities, the engineers have to understand that heavy machines that
cause trauma should not be used on the already built building to avoid cracks and collapse of
the building. In most construction activities, drilling has been the cause of the trauma that has
led to collapse of some buildings. Drilling causes trauma which can make the cracks in the
building to widen and eventually leading to a major damage that can cause a building or a
construction to come down crushing.
When conducting renovation and any other construction works, it is indispensable for the
engineers to have lighting equipment to avoid working in darkness. Any work done in darkness
is susceptive to damage as the workers will not be able to see what is happening (Building,
2018). For instance, in the course of demolishing some walls during the renovation, there is a
possibility of tampering with the columns and pillars of the building, something that can cause
cracks and collapse of the entire building. Such a fact cannot be ruled out in the case of
Heritage building. On the other hand, once the contract bid has been worn and schematic
design selected, the contractor has to be vetted to authenticate his professionalism in the
construction work. The past experience and successful constructions have to be used as
samples of the work they have done. Equally, it is advisable to also consider checking the failed
construction work by the constructor so that an evaluation can be done to come up with an
informed decision on whether to allow the constructor to continue with the work. This fact can be
another reason that caused the building to collapse. If no such vetting was carried out, there is a
possibility that the renovator did not have adequate experience in renovating houses.
4 CASE STUDY II
The case involves a building that collapsed on Liverpool Road in Enfield in England. 40
people were evacuated from that building. Initial reports alleged that a car may have crashed
into the building and that there was some smell of a gas coming from the building. There was
some construction that was going on in an adjoining construction site (Levy, 2016). However,
the police report later indicated that there were no signs of a car crash and that there appeared

Ethics and Code of Conduct 6
to have been some earth slippage from the side of the construction site. The decision was
arrived at to demolish the whole building because it was not stable and leaving the building
standing would have been another disaster in the making waiting to happen. Occupants of the
building said that the building had been shaking for some time and that the upstairs cracking
just before the wall collapsed. The occupants lost all their property which in their time was their
livelihood.
This case is somehow complex because it involves two issues that are connected to the
collapse of the building. The first issue relates to the story told by the occupants of the same
building that the building had started shaking sometimes back before it collapsed. The other
issue involves the nearby construction site that could have caused the building to collapse
(Levy, 2016). The two cases are related in one way or the other, from the look of things, the
shaking that the occupants of the building heard and felt might have been caused by something
else or the construction that was ongoing nearby. There are many factors that can contribute to
the collapse of the building as a result of the activities going on in the construction site. For
instance, the construction site could have been involved in digging and excavating the site
which required the use of the heavy machinery and equipment that are capable of causing a lot
of shaking. The machines involved in such activities are heavy duty machines that can cause
trauma of the area and the surrounding. If the distance between the building that collapsed and
the place of excavation was short then, there is a likelihood that the excavation contributed
largely to the collapse.
On the other hand, the excavation can lead loosening of the soil that holds the building
causing it to collapse because the supports have become weaker. When the constructors
involved are not skilled enough, they tend to do simple things that cause large destruction (Al-
Turki, Ayar, Yilbas and Sahin, 2014). Also, when the constructing team wants to do something
quickly they may overlook the impact of their speed and the machines they are using on the
buildings and constructions that are closer. For instance, there were allegations that there was
some earth slippage on the side of construction. The constructors could have done the
excessive digging, making the building foundation to be loose. That will be a deliberate action
by the constructors or that would have been interpreted as incompetence on their side or both.
In addition, pilling of excavated materials adjacent to the building could have exerted excessive
weight on the building making it collapse since it did not have the support from the ground that
was required due to the weakening of the ground. Whether the cause of the collapse was
caused or originated from the construction site or from the building itself, it is apparent that
someone was responsible for the misfortune. The issue of a code of conduct and ethics

Ethics and Code of Conduct 7
definitely applies to this case because there might have been some people who did not do their
job as required or maybe someone applied unethical behavior that led to the collapse of the
building. For both alleged causes, none have been connected with a natural disaster like an
earthquake that can be argued to have caused the collapse of the building. Even in situations
where natural disasters are reported, engineers are advised to use innovations that can help
buildings to withstand them. In fact, places that are prone to be hit by natural disasters are often
constructed in a certain way to ensure that in the event a natural disaster occurs there will be no
causalities or further damage to the people and the building.
5 COMPARISON OF THE TWO CASES
In the case that involved the Heritage building, the building collapsed at the time when
renovation work was ongoing in the basement of that same building. The argument in this case
is that there must be some connection between the renovation work and the collapse of the
building. One of the analysis of the case is that the renovators did not follow the required
guideline when executing the renovation. Their negligence and incompetence may have been
the cause of the drastic and horrible collapse of the building. In the case of the second case
study, the building collapsed because of the activities ongoing at the construction site next to
the building. The analysis in this case is that the constructors could not have followed the
required guidelines that would have made the existing buildings remain stable even as the new
construction went on. They ignored the principles that were necessary to follow while using
heavy equipment in a place that is close to other buildings. Their incompetence and negligence
led to the shaking of the building and eventually the collapse that led to the occupants losing all
their property and escaping with their lives.
Constructors have the responsibility of following the laid down procedures and exercise
code of conduct as professional constructors. There is not excuse or reason that is far worthy
than the safety of the people. There are rules to be followed during excavations and when using
heavy equipment. Also, there are rules to be followed when carrying out renovations to a
building that must be followed. It is unethical for the constructors to execute the mandates
when they know that they have not followed the laid down procedures (Chow, 2009). For
instance, it is required that the constructors have to conduct a risk assessment for any project in
progress. The risk assessment helps in identifying any kind of risk that may exist in the project
and provide some remedies in case there is a risk identified. The findings of the risk assessment
must be evaluated again and the right decision made. However, many risk assessments tend to
be well developed but fail to be implemented accordingly. People often look at the short term

Ethics and Code of Conduct 8
consequences and forget that when the rules are made they are to protect those who
understand them and also those who do not understand them at all. However, the question that
comes to mind is what causes the assessments to be ignored or fail to be implemented.
One of the reasons for failure to implement the risk assessment reports is because of
ignorance by the constructors. In situations when the constructor anticipate that the project
might be canceled depending on the risks identified, some of them just go ahead and ignore the
report so that they can continue with the project. Regardless of the value of the project, the lives
of the people should matter and more so the commitment to the code of conduct and the ethics
of the profession. However, the consequences of such decisions lead to disasters like the
collapse of the structures as witnessed in the above two cases (Clements-Croome, 2004).
Conversely, some risk assessors lack the competence in assessing the risks involved in a
project construction. When this happens, there is a high probability of construction of the
substandard structure.
Some of the owners of the structures also contribute to disasters witnessed during
construction. For instance, when a project budget seems to be on the higher side, some owners
of the project may find it difficult to carry on with the project especially when they do not have
enough resources to fund the project (Clements-Croome, 2004). Therefore, in conjunction with
the constructors, they decide to continue with the project using the substandard material to cut
the cost of construction. Nevertheless, although the owners may not be well versed with the
consequences of such decisions, the constructors fail to advise them on the consequences of
such actions. In such a situation, the constructors could be argued to have conducted
themselves in an unethical manner by allowing going on with the construction even when they
clearly understand the risks involved in the project.
In the second case study, there were reports that the building had been shaking before it
collapsed. This is a clear indication that the building had not been built as required. Structures
raised appropriately are firm and would not experience such incidences of shaking and cracks.
This can be argued to be the same case as the first case study that collapsed as there were
some renovations going on in the basement. It means that the building had not been built with
the required standards and that is why it collapsed (Kister and Hawkins, 2006). A well-built
structure should be in a position to withstand any kind of renovations that may be carried out.
Besides, it is highly recommended that when carrying out renovations, the initial constructor of
the building be used to do the renovations because they clearly understand the status of the
building right from the initial stages of raising the building. Nevertheless, the second case study
is a bit complex because there are two accounts of what might have gone wrong. The first one

Ethics and Code of Conduct 9
involves allegations that the building had cracks that resulted from the shaking it experienced
before it collapsed. The second account involves the activities of the new construction site that
might have led to the collapse of the building. Whatever the source of the problem, the most
outstanding reason revolves around unethical behavior by the constructions or bad code of
conducts by the professionals.
6 CAUSES OF THE COLLAPSE OF THE BUILDINGS
There could be various causes of the collapse of the buildings in the two case studies.
The presumption is that the work done on the buildings could be as a result of a bad code of
conduct by the contractors. During constructions, substandard structures are as a result of
failure by the contractor to effectively supervise the crews (Santamouris, 2006). In fact, some
contractors have been accused of not even visiting the construction site as the work goes on.
This poses a great danger because the crews can decide to skip some critical steps in the
construction. Other can decide to steal construction material, something that can lead to the use
of inadequate materials which is dangerous to the stability of the building. When the contractor
fails to be committed to supervising the work, sometimes there is a delay in executing the
project. This is a good sign that the construction did not meet the requirements and that there is
a possibility that the building is of substandard quality and might experience some cracks or
collapse afterward.
In this regard, the owners of the projects are required to observe a careful analysis of the
contract terms made which are related to scheduling, operations, and expectations of the
quality. Failure to do so, there is a high probability that the terms were just fantasies. In fact, it is
recommended that after the completion of the construction, it is critical to have registered
inspectors conduct the inspection of the structure (Kultgen, 2010). In case it is found out that the
construction was substandard, the contract terms should include what is supposed to be done
and the person involved should take the responsibility. This way, the contractors will be more
attentive when executing their duties. Studies have documented that deficiency of such
measures make contractors attempt to work beyond their capacity and take shortcuts that lead
to disasters like the ones recorded in the two case studies. There must be a way to bring such
cases to the light and those who are found culpable punished for failing to follow the right
procedure during the process.
Some project owners tend to have unrealistic expectations that lead to changes to be
made to the original plan. More often than not, these changes are made too quickly without
determining the risks involved in such actions. When risks are later identified and the attempt to

Ethics and Code of Conduct 10
recover the anticipated changes is done, the probability of adverse risks increases (Al-Turki et
al, 2014). In fact, such decisions are a sign of ineffective planning which translates to a lack of
adequate attention to logistics and addressing potential changes right in good time. Effective
planning ensures that constraints of the project are well understood before the projects kick off.
There have been cases of contractors subcontracting the project to other contractors.
Such activities are dangerous because the chain involved in the construction can have
disparities in regards to following the required procedure and adhering to the terms of contact.
The main contractor may decide to subcontract a project so that they can save some money out
of the deal. However, the subcontracted entity may decide to use the substandard material for
the construction so that they can make a huge income from the project. Such deeds amount to
a bad code of conduct to both the contractors (Clements-Croome, 2004). In case there are such
deals reached out, the owner of the project is supposed to be informed and the terms to be
included in the contract. Nevertheless, some contractors do this without the knowledge of the
owner of the project.
7 BEST CONTACT PRACTICES
Although it is the responsibility of the constructor to ensure that the construction is of the
required standards, it is also the responsibility of the owner of a project to ensure that they
conduct adequate research and interview of the contractor. Poor preconstruction practices by
the owner of a project have been found to be a major cause of project failures (Chow, 2009).
The owner of the project is supposed to ensure that the contractor is certified and that they have
the required knowledge and expertise in the project assigned. Some contractors proclaim to
have the relevant expertise even when they are not. All they care about is the money they get
from the contract. This is considered as unethical by the engineering practitioners and should be
dealt with.
On the side of contractors, it is always advisable to conduct preconstruction planning in
order to have a smooth project. The contractor should ensure that the budget is established
depending on the kind of project proposed. The budgeting should be done by including budget
experts in the decision-making process. Project risk assessment experts need to be
incorporated into the preconstruction preparations. Risk assessment details any potential risk
associated with the project and ways of overcoming them and people mandated to execute the
risk mitigation strategies (Kister and Hawkins, 2006). The contractors then need to select
construction staff depending on the expertise and experience. During the selection process, it is
indispensable to lay down the qualifications needed and the objectives of the project. This way,

Ethics and Code of Conduct 11
they will be in a position to select the required staff who will be able to execute the tasks
required professionally. Some contractors would consider selecting internal staff that they have
past working with. Others would consider selecting new staff externally because they feel that
they will bring in new skills and expertise to blend in with the existing staff.
8 CONCLUSION
There are several ways through which engineers can engage in unethical behaviors in
their line of duties. Instead of buying standard materials, some constructors buy substandard
materials, something that leads to a poorly built building. The first case study involved Heritage
building that collapsed as a result of renovation activities that were going on next to the building.
It is evident that there was a problem with the renovation activities that led to the collapse of the
building. In analyzing the contribution of the renovation activities in the basement, the
renovation engineers need to have prior knowledge of the condition of the building before they
commence the renovation work. In the second case study, the building collapsed because of
two issues highlighted: the shaking of the building before it collapsed and the effects of
construction work that went on in a nearby construction site. There are many factors that can
contribute to the collapse of the building as a result of the activities going on in the construction
site. The excavation can lead loosening of the soil that holds the building causing it to collapse.
In the two case studies, it is evident that the disasters are related to the bad code of
conduct by the contractors. If proper preconstruction measures are taken seriously, some of
these problems can be avoided. In fact, the owners of the buildings have also the responsibility
of seeing that the contractors meet the qualification for the construction of the building. They
should verify their expertise by conducting adequate research on their past constructions. All in
all, it is indispensable for the contractors to ensure that they adhere to the code of conduct of
professionalism as engineers.

Ethics and Code of Conduct 12
9 REFERENCES
Al-Turki, U., Ayar, T., Yilbas, B. and Sahin, A. (2014). Integrated Maintenance Planning in
Manufacturing Systems. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Building, T. (2018). New code of estimating practice. 1st ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Chow, T. (2009). Development trends in building services engineering. 1st ed. Hong Kong: City
University of Hong Kong Press.
Clements-Croome, D. (2004). Intelligent buildings. 1st ed. London: Thomas Telford.
Kister, T. and Hawkins, B. (2006). Maintenance Planning and Scheduling: Streamline Your
Organization for a Lean Environment. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Kultgen, J. (1988). Ethics and Professionalism. 1st ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania
Press.
Levy, M. (2016) Residents evacuated as building collapses on Liverpool Road in Enfield.
Retrieved from:
Santamouris, M. (2006). Environmental Design of Urban Buildings: An Integrated Approach. 1st
ed. London: Routledge.
Sunday Times. (2018) Heritage-listed building collapses in Fremantle after renovations.
Retrieved from: