This document discusses different ethical perspectives on various topics such as free healthcare, character education, human sacrifice, same-sex marriage, and more. It explores the concepts of consequentialism, deontology, moral relativism, and duty ethics.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someoneβs learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: ETHICS PERSPECTIVES1 Course Name: Name of the Student: Institution Affiliation:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
RUNNING HEAD:Ethical perspective 2 1.Free health care should be available to all people. After all, if that were the case, it would benefit everyone. On my views this argument primarily reflect consequentialism ethical perspective in that the action of free health care will bring more happiness than the alternative action and also the action morally right. If you weigh the consequence of the free health care it will have a positive impact to society and many individual, will enjoy the services. The action will promote our own happiness than it will do to the alternatives. 2.Character education should be part of the public school system in the U.S. We need to cultivate integrity in our children, and the public school system should play a role in this important process. According to my opinion the argument is reflect Deontology/Duty Ethics, ethical perspective. We know that we are obligated to act with integrity in everything we undertake and this is a universal rule (Donlevy & Walker, 2013). The morality of this action is right and is grounded under a series of rules, so character education should be part and parcel of U.S public school system. So we obligated to act according to the sets rules and regulations. 3.Although many societies have practiced human sacrifice, within the cultures of those societies, human sacrifice wasn't considered wrong, even though we believe it is wrong in our culture. So, human sacrifice within those cultures wasn't really wrong. This primarily reflect Moral Relativism ethical perspective, since according that some culture they believed in their cultural practices and their beliefs. So the belief sacrificing human being is right although many human race believe that killing someone is not right decision and is
RUNNING HEAD:Ethical perspective 3 morally wrong. When it comes to moral relativism, it does not reflect truths of universal morals but instead do claims based on cultural historical, social and personal circumstances. 4.Same-sex marriage is right because the polls show that most Americans favor it, even if that is not the case in other countries. This also reflect moral relativism; according to some culture they believed in their cultural beliefs. So the belief that same sex marriage is right, is based on personal decision and circumstances. Although many human race believe that same sex marriage is morally wrong. When it comes to moral relativism, it does not reflect truths of universal morals but instead do claims based on cultural historical, social and personal circumstances. 5.The legalization of same-sex marriage is wrong because the government has no right to legally sanction any form of personal relationship except one: marriage relationships between a man and a woman. That is the only type of relationship that can lead to procreation, and the state has a legitimate interest in procreation. Thus, the state has a duty to support marriage between a man and a woman, and a duty to refrain from getting legally involved in other types of relationships. This basically reflect Duty Ethics/Deontology; because this clearly state that action should morally base on whether action is wrong or right under sequence of rules and regulations rather than grounded on action consequences. On above argument legalization of same sex marriage is viewed as wrong since our universal interest legitimacy is human procreation and there are sets rules to guide us. 6.Dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was wrong because those acts violated the right to life of many innocent people, and we should protect those rights.
RUNNING HEAD:Ethical perspective 4 This primarily reflect Duty Ethics; because this explains that action should be based morally on whether action is wrong or right in a series of rules and regulations rather than based on action consequences. So here basically killing innocent people through atomic bomb is against the law. 7.Dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was right because those acts ended the war faster, and thus made the world a safer place. This primarily reflect consequentialism ethical perspective because the consequence of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki lead the ending of war and made world to be peaceful; the action brought more happiness to the people than it would alternatively, according to me it was the right decision to make. 8.We need to do a background check and to collect some character references on Mr. Jones before we hire him. This reflects basically Virtue ethics; where we need to know traits of Mr. Jones before we hire him. How does he behave to situation, is he upright and straight forward, can we trust him or he is an irresponsible person? So here we need to get the real reputation of Mr. Jones before we hire him, if donβt do so we might make wrong decision and hire a wrong person to work for us. He must be a person who is physically and psychologically balanced. 9.He doesn't have the right character and temperament to be a state governor. He has been involved in corruption scandals, he is known to be dishonest, and he has problems controlling his anger. This reflects on Virtue Ethics perspective; because we see someone character and get that he has bad character traits as corrupt, dishonest and have a problem with controlling his anger.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
RUNNING HEAD:Ethical perspective 5 Through that, we get that the person in question is not fit to be the governor and as a leader we expect him to have good qualities of leadership. 10.Sure, slavery is wrong in our society because we all agree it's wrong. But slavery isn't absolutely wrong. Many societies have practiced slavery. This reflect moral relativism; according to our society we believe that slavery is wrong morally (Singer, (2011). The belief that slavery is wrong is based on personal decision and circumstances. Although many societies have practice slavery, which is morally wrong. When it comes to moral relativism, it does not reflect truths of universal morals but instead do claims based on cultural historical, social and personal circumstances
RUNNING HEAD:Ethical perspective 6 References Donlevy, J. K., & Walker, K. D. (2013).Dancing on the Narrow Ridge: Superintendents' Ethical Decision Making. Lulu. com. Singer, P. (2011).Practical ethics. Cambridge university press.