This study discusses the criteria that customers can use to evaluate contractor proposals, including compliance with the statement of work, understanding customer needs, and the realism of the contractor's schedule.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head:EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL Evaluation of contractor’s proposal Name of the student: Name of the university: Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL Three criteria that a customer could use to evaluate a contractor’s proposal: The customers can analyse proposals of contractors in various ways. There are multiple criteria through which customers can evaluate contractor proposals. In this study, the compliance of contractors with a statement of work of customer is analysed. Next, understanding the needs and suggestions of customers are discussed. Next, the realism of the contractor’s schedule for those issues has been demonstrated here. The statement of work is a formal document defining the complete working scope included for vendors. This has been clarifying timeline, costs and deliverables. This is required in cases where these projects have involved vendors and different external contributors besides internal project group1. This has been important that SOW gets cleared to every stakeholder for clarifying metrics for success and then avoid disputed including timelines, budgets and deliverables.Here, the statement of works for customers includes every deliverable and due dates, distinct tasks leading to deliverable and who those tasks are being assigned. To understand customer needs and problems is the first step. For this the first tool is top reveal about answering the public. This has been a cool site since this has been essentially being a search engine of sorts. However, one put search terms this has been a thorough list of questions and related topic for treating them2.Next, the customers are to be interviewed. Here the most 1Hyari, K.H., 2016. Owner’s countermeasures to skewed bidding in construction projects: Review of current practices and proposal for new countermeasures.Journal of Management in Engineering,33(3), p.04016053. 2Błaszczyk, P. and Błaszczyk, T., 2015. On the support of the general contractor’s decisions in the processes of event project management. InGlobal Enterprise Management(pp. 189-204). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
2EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL significant way to push them for helping us to reveal what the challenges have been. Most importantly they need to recognize what issues are to be solved actually. Next, the reviews are to be seen. As studies are received from customers they are going to seek that. They should be open about proper experiences they have been possessing and the value they have gained from that3. The last one is the realism of the contractor’s schedule. Here product planning is the process where every contractor, subcontractors and others included in construction must collaborate to generate a realistic timeline4. They must be involved in main scheduling processes helping to devise a more realistic program from the beginning and provide people who have been performing one of a sense of ownership in a project. The above mentioned criteria that customers can analyse contractor’s proposals are useful clues to experience issues that ate needed to be addressed. They must be looked for solving the problems are to be turned for connecting and repositioning the entire business. These are efficiently instanced from various clients. The highlights of all those reviews have stated the similar thing that they are to be resolved as early as possible. 3Welch, H.J., Kabnick, L., Vasquez, M.A., Monahan, D.L., Lurie, F. and Jacobowicz, G., 2017. Proposal for a national coverage determination for the treatment of varicose veins and venous disease due to disparate Centers for Medicare and MedicaidServiceslocalcoveragedeterminationpolicies.JournalofVascularSurgery:VenousandLymphatic Disorders,5(3), pp.453-459. 4Rodin, D.N., 2014. The cybersecurity partnership: A proposal for cyberthreat information sharing between contractors and the federal government.Pub. Cont. LJ,44, p.505.
3EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL References: Błaszczyk, P. and Błaszczyk, T., 2015. On the support of the general contractor’s decisions in the processes of event project management. InGlobal Enterprise Management(pp. 189-204). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Hyari, K.H., 2016. Owner’s countermeasures to skewed bidding in construction projects: Review of currentpracticesandproposalfornewcountermeasures.JournalofManagementin Engineering,33(3), p.04016053. Rodin, D.N., 2014. The cybersecurity partnership: A proposal for cyberthreat information sharing between contractors and the federal government.Pub. Cont. LJ,44, p.505. Welch, H.J., Kabnick, L., Vasquez, M.A., Monahan, D.L., Lurie, F. and Jacobowicz, G., 2017. Proposal for a national coverage determination for the treatment of varicose veins and venous disease due to disparate Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services local coverage determination policies.Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders,5(3), pp.453-459.