Evaluation Framework for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Programs
Verified
Added on  2023/06/18
|14
|3882
|497
AI Summary
This research paper discusses the evaluation framework for health promotion and disease prevention programs, including case studies and data analysis methods. It also includes a program for reducing diabetes in a remote village.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someoneâs learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Evaluationframeworkfor health promotion and disease prevention programs
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
INTRODUCTION Evaluation framework for health promotion and disease prevention programs, can be understood as one of the most specific essential aspect which enhance working reach among audience and participants for project. Research will also further include analysis of case studies for evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs, on basis of attending new details. Study will enable in depth analysis on significant data analysis methods, and usage of best effective programs for reaching out to wider sections among people competently towards strengthened vision and effective timely implementation. Case study 1 1.Describing the program ï·Lower consumption of fruits and vegetables is one of the main issue of concern inGreat Southern region especially among children. Not only this, consumption of water by childrenâs is also lower as a result most of the children in Great Southern region are dehydrating due to which their concentration level in class is reducing. With the help of Fruit and Water Policy in School Pilot Projectchildren can be indulgedin healthy eating and drinking practices. ï·Policy context:This project is directly linked to national food and nutrition policy whose main priority is to enhance healthy eating habits among people. This project was extremely important to be conducted for enhancing fruits and vegetable consumption among children. ï·Program aims to address health inequalities among children, by indulging them in healthy eating, drinking practices at school. ï·Program contributes to social change and advocacy byencourage teachers to implement classroom policies for students, to further increase the consumption of fruit and water among primary ï·ActionareasofOttawaCharterandJakartaDeclarationarereflectedinproject: Promotingsocialresponsibilityforhealth,increasinginvestmentsforhealth development, especially for groups such as children. Outline of the project has been provided below in given figure:
2.Evaluation Preview ï·Identificationofkeystakeholdersinvolved:Stakeholderssuchashealthpromoting communities for project evaluation, education department ofGreat Southern region. ï·Purpose of evaluation: purpose of evaluating this project is to achieve following objectives, such as: oTo evaluate whether main objective of the project was achieved or not oTo ensure that schools have implemented fruit and water policy within organizationï·Identification of key questions for the evaluation that need to be answered for review of process, impact/outcome: Following are the main questions to be answered for evaluation of program: Question FocusQuestions ProcessDid the program implement in its expected manner? ImpactDid the program implement successfully? Were end resulted obtained or achieved? Future programIsitimportanttoorganizethistypeof Program activitiesImpactsOutcomes Education and skill development Intervention of enhancing food and water intake by children Development and implementation food water policy with action plan Implementation of fruit and water policy within schools Increased consumption of fruits, vegetables and water Improved studentâs concentration Increased concentration of children in classroom Reduced dehydration among children Consumption of fruits, vegetable and water increased
programs in future? Arethereanykindofimprovements required to be brought? Identification of key resources that may be required for the evaluation; i.e. funds, human and non-human resources:The key resources which will be required are funds, human resources and non-human resources which are significantly crucial for attending working criteria diversely. 3 Evaluation design The descriptive study design method signifies focuses on fact optimisation, where results can be analysed strategically on basis of recent trends ongoing and to further pertain data in proper structured format (Hughe, Rana and Dwivedi, 2020).Program included classroom lesson and further completed Greater Southern region aspects, which also will be integrating advanced scale results profoundly. 4 Collection of data Interview as a data collection tool was used for data collection in which teachers of different schools were interviewed Teachers will undertake the tasks, and tasks will be taken place, after completion of work and gaining detailed accurate results from interviews. This will be done after completion of data management from event, where various situations will be analyzed effectively on productive working horizons. Evaluation process ActivitiesOutput Education and skill developmentConsumption of fruits, vegetable and water increased and implementation of fruit and water policy among schools Intervention of enhancing food and water intake by children Increasedconcentrationofchildrenas consumption of water is increased Development and implementation food water policy with action plan Reduced dehydration among children
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Impact Impactindicators Implementation of fruit and water policy within schools Assessmentofimportanceofpolicyfor school children done and action plan finalized Increased consumption of fruits, vegetables and water Evidence that consumption of fruits and water increased Improved studentâs concentrationImproved eating habits of children 5 Dissemination of lessons learned Parents of children will have access to results of the evaluation, as specific student indulgent information will be sent to them in personal for ensuring adequate and accessible information is being sent. The results can be sent by email to respective parents of children through email for wider health promotion practitioners, for learning work aspects advanced up format to further generate leveraged work growth criteria. 6Analysis and interpretation of data The key findings, themes and information will be summarised from key findings by analysis based on thematic parameters, for attending new working criteria significantly on enhanced working growth domains. 7. Report informing stakeholders of the results of the evaluation (a) Executive summary Poor consumption of fruits, vegetables and water is one of the main issue in Great Southern region. Due to lower water consumption dehydration has become a major issue of concern especially for children of Great Southern region. It is a critical issue mostly because diet of children, their water consumption is not focused upon as a result of dehydration concentration of children in classrooms is decreasing. Due to this critical issue a program to encourage children toenhancetheirconsumptionoffruitsandvegetablesaswellasincreasetheirwater consumption is required to be developed. (b) Program Background The main purpose of this program was to encourage students toindulge in healthy food andbeveragespractice,whereconsumptionofsmallbottlesinwaterandfruitsare
complemented further.This program had also focused upon reducingdehydration issue among childrenas it isaffecting their health. A 15 monthsâ evaluation program was developed for evaluation of project to be done simultaneously. Implementation of this project included most of the schools ofGreat Southern region to provide background information of children. Sample fruits and water policies were distributed to schools;students were encouraged to bring 500 ml water bottle to school each day. (c) Evaluation background Main purpose of evaluating this project was to ensure that consumption of fruits, vegetables and water among students has increased, fruits and water policy among schools has been implemented or not, concentration of students has increased or not. One of the main constraint within this evolution of this project was availability of resources. This is because data to be collected was from large population but resources available for collection was limited. (d) Evaluation methodology Study design: Descriptive research studydesign was used as an effective study designfor attaining results form group of people, situation and varied phenomenon where it further aims to enhance accuracy significantly as per latest results. ï·Strength:It directly displays results in effective order and with concise meaning, where descriptive research analysis will be dynamically evolving to enhance working strength. ï·Limitation:Complicated and elaborative if not done strategically, which may hamper research results on wider grounds. Data collection tool: Interviewwas selected as adata collection tool and effective instrument, where gaining outcomes of program fromteacherswill enable results to be associated with significant aspects dynamically. Strength:The strength of this data collection instrument i.e interview, can be understood that information will be attained from primary source and with high accuracy which further results in gaining detailed analysis worked on (Mintenig and et.al,., 2020).
ï·Limitation:The limitation of interview on other hand, is that the procedures are time taking and also often elaborative which may result in chaos if not conducted in strategical format. (e) Data analysis Qualitative data analysis method was selected for analysis.Data analysis, will be done in primary formation where results are in proper structured format for gaining results as per scale among working horizons which further enhances working expertise (Sarrala, 2021). Observation and inspections, will enable to get results of procedures taken within research analysed where interview further will deliver competitive aspects worked on strategically. ï·Assumption:one of the main observation made was that all the data collected from interview was authentic. ï·Limitation:However, limitation is that it may be at times based on assumptions which limits accuracy if working decisions not analysed practically. (f) Findings sections The findings sections, further enable us to gain results that eleven classes form 6 schools which participated in school within second term further showed, that majority of students consumed fruits on afternoons and drank bottle of water. Allteacherswho answeredall questions in interviewplanned to continue water policy, and 82 % further planned to continue fruit policy where feedbacks from teachers suggested projects to be improved on studentâs concentration. (g) CONCLUSION This project was a success as most of the schools focused upon implementingfruit and water policy through structured classroom activities,and also focused upon educatingchildren about healthy eating and drinking practices including fruits, vegetables and water consumption (Mohammed, 2021). (h) Recommendations For further engaging on new research horizons, fruits and water policy can be further implemented effectively by bringing on social mediacould have been used for enhancing engagement ofstudents outside from schoolas well. Instead of qualitative, quantitative analysis method could have been used for identifying accuracy in terms of success of project.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
CASE STUDY 2: Diabetes Step 1. Describe the program Diabetes is one of the major issue in village of Tjuntjuntjara. In fact, out of four one individual is diabetic.Paupiyala TjarutjaAboriginal Corporation took an initiative and implemented a diabetes education program so that people of this remote village can be educated and awareness about diabetes can be raised and management of diabetes can be done(Power and et. al., 2021). This project was of 2 months so that during this time period all the members of community can be educated about seriousness of this disease, methods of prevention, engagement of members of community in physical activities. An outline of this project has been provided in below given figure: Program ActivitiesImpactOutcome Establishmonitoring of program Educatingabout effectivewaysof managing diabetes Educate about healthy waysofpreventing diabetes Physicalactivity increased Healthyeating habit increased Knowledge about diabetes increased Knowledgeabout diabetesprevention increased Reduced chances of sufferingfrom diabetes Change in quality of lifestyle and way of livinginpositive manner
Step 2. Evaluation preview: Stakeholders involved: Stakeholders involved in evaluation of programs are: management and administrative members of Paupiyala Tjarutja Aboriginal Corporation, remote community healthcare professionals, community health clinic members. Purpose of evaluation: Main purpose of evaluating this project were for achievement of following objectives: ï·To evaluate extent till which this initiative was successfully implemented ï·To provide support to community members so that prevalence of diabetes can be reduced. ï·To bring improvement within lifestyle of community members so that diabetes can be prevented or managed in an appropriate manner. Key Questions: Following are the main evaluation questions for evaluation of this diabetes program: Question FocusQuestions Processï·Has the program been implemented as expected or not? ï·Hasimplementationofprograminvolvedallthe community members or not? ï·Wereallthestakeholdersinvolvedintheproject satisfied or not? Impacts and outcomesï·Was the program a success or failure? ï·Were desired outcomes achieved? ï·Did the project successfully generated interest of target community members? Futureprogramsandpolicy implications ï·Should this type of program be developed further or continued? ï·Waysinwhichimprovementwithinprogrambe brought? Resources for evaluation: Resources required for evaluation of this project are: ï·Funds and budget for evaluation that includes data collection, processing and evaluation
ï·Human resources who can participate in evaluation process and especially data collection and analysis process. Step 3. Focus the evaluation design: Establish study design: Pre and post measures of study design is the best study design and for this Process evaluation method can be selected for evaluation of project. In this method main documents of the program or project are reviewed(Power and et. al., 2021). This can directly help in identifying main activities involved in the project, processes involved in the project. This further helps in identifying whether appropriate measures were taken for educating all the members of the community or not. It would further help in evaluating appropriateness of all the activities involved in the project, quality of processes and activities that were implemented. Data collection tool: Main types of data collection tools that can be used for generating information for evaluation of project(Chuter and et. al., 2019). All the main documents associated with the project would be collected such as Community health clinic records, progress report of the project, evolution plans etc. Data collection method: Qualitative data collection method would be selected for collection of data for evaluation of project. In this other than collecting important documents, a survey would be conducted in which community members and healthcare professionals providing service to community people would participate. Process of evaluation ActivitiesOutput Establish monitoring of programï·Identification of project milestones ï·Keyindicatorsofmonitoringprogram identified Educating about effective ways of managing diabetes ï·Ways of educating reviewed ï·Selected intervention reviewed Educateabout healthy waysof preventing diabetes ï·Communityassessmentconductedand gaps within current knowledge of diabetes preventionmanagementincommunity
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
people identified ï·Action plan finalized Impact ImpactIndicators Physical activity increasedMeetings about level of physical activity that should be maintained is identified Healthy eating habit increasePromotionofrecommendedlevelof vegetables and fruits consumption identified Knowledge about diabetes increasedSelf- knowledge about diabetes increased Knowledgeaboutdiabetesprevention increased Improvementwithinlifestylemadeand knowledgeofpreventingdiabetesfurther enhanced. Step 4. Collect data: Task required to be completed are: completion of health promotion evaluation resource form, conduction of survey for collection of data would be done(Seear and et. al., 2020). These task would be undertaken by all the members involved in evaluation program and all the task, roles and responsibilities would be assigned or determined by head of evaluation committee and head of Paupiyala Tjarutja Aboriginal Corporation. Step 5. Disseminate lessons learned Access to results of evaluation should only be given to head of evaluation committee and to head of Paupiyala Tjarutja Aboriginal Corporation. In order to ensure that adequate and accessible information provided to these individual a report that consist of summary of project, background, method chosen for data collection, analysis of project and key findings of the evaluation is included. In order to distribute results for learning of health promotion practitioners: training could be provided to practitioners, education program details can be provided in printed format, new technology can be used for communication such as social media, and polices can be developed.
Step 6. Analyse and interpret data: In order to analyse and interpret results qualitative methods of analysis would be adopted for analysis of results of reports collected and survey conducted. But selection of appropriate analysis method would be selected by head of evaluation committee. Step 7: Report informing stakeholders (a)Executive summary Diabetes is one of the main issue which is being faced by Remote community of Tjuntjuntjara. Out of two one adult is suffering from diabetes. Not only adults but it is an issue of concern for children as well. Out of four members of community one of them is suffering from diabetes(Donat, 2017). This is a critical issue which is prevailing among members of remote community because of lack of awareness among people, lack of knowledge about management and prevalence of diabetes result in increasing suffering of people from diabetes. Due to this critical issue there was a need of diabetes education program. (b)Program background The main purpose of this program was to increase awareness about management of diabetes and so that it can be prevented among people of Tjuntjuntjara community. A 2 monthsâ log program was developed in which evaluation of health records were done prevention measures were identified and ways in which it can be managed was identified. Implementation strategy of this project involved all the members of Tjuntjuntjara village. Different activities were held at different time so that maximum number of members of community can attend education and awareness program. (c)Evaluation background The main purpose of evaluation is to evaluate whether the program had successfully helped in generating awareness about diabetes health issue, level of physical activities of community members were increased and awareness about healthy/ unhealthy eating habits were changed or not. But however time was one of the main constraint in evaluation of program but availability of data was not an issue. So in order to overcome it, a survey was conducted for collection of important and required data. (d)Evaluation methodology Pre and post measure study design was selected on the basis of which evaluation of project was done.
Data collection tool selected was conduction of survey in which both community service providers and members of community participated. Survey is one of the most effective data collection tool that can directly help in gaining understanding and viewpoint of participants their characteristics in an appropriate manner. but it also has a weakness i.e., it only consists of close ended questions. For examination and evaluation of data collected, qualitative methods were selected for evaluation of project. (e)Data analysis For analysis of data first of all, all the data will be collected using survey. Then qualitative analysis method would be selected for analysis of collected data. Some of the main assumptions made was that made during this analysis were: that all the participants who participated in the survey had attended the education program, all the answers given by the respondents were honest. But it also had some limitations such as: it was a time consuming process. (f)Findings This program had successfully helped in educating 100 out of 110 community members and had further successfully helped in identifying importance of healthy/ unhealthy eating habits as well as important of physical exercise for preventing diabetes. (g)Conclusions From the collected evidences it has been concluded that this program was a success and had successfully helped in achieving its main program objectives in an appropriate manner. (h)Recommendations In future various improvement in implementation of this project can be brought such as digital technologies can be used for educating target population as it will directly help in providing education to larger number of population. Whereas for evaluation quantitative analysis technique can be used in future.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.