Comprehensive Analysis of Government Efficiency: A Research Report

Verified

Added on  2023/05/28

|6
|1566
|398
Report
AI Summary
This report analyzes government efficiency across 159 countries, using postal service return rates as a key metric. The research, based on mailing letters to non-existent addresses, assesses factors like technology and management quality. The study's strengths include the use of an objective measure and its focus on service outcomes, while weaknesses include a Eurocentric view of government. Key findings reveal that technology and management quality significantly influence government efficiency. The report discusses implications for the public and private sectors, emphasizing the importance of non-political factors such as management and technology investment. The paper concludes that government efficiency is linked to management quality and technology, emphasizing the need for improved bureaucracy and technological advancements to enhance government service delivery.
Document Page
Statistics
Student Name:
Student ID:
Subject:
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
1
Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................2
Explanation of the research.........................................................................................................................2
Summary of the approach, methodology and main findings........................................................................2
Strengths and weaknesses of the study........................................................................................................3
Discussion of the implications of the study.................................................................................................3
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................4
References...................................................................................................................................................5
Document Page
2
Introduction
The paper has effectively helped in evaluating the facts associated with the quality of
operations by various governments in various countries as well as its determinants. The strength
of the study was also reflected throughout the paper as the use of standard production function
was adopted which helped the management team for executing the entire work process. On the
other hand, one of the fact evaluated throughout the study of the article was fundamental puzzles
that are based on the quality of the government. It will suggest some of the factors that needs to
be followed within the study based on government efficiency.
Explanation of the research
The research executed throughout the paper revealed the construction of the new
objective measures of the government effeminacy within the 159 countries. The study considers
government efficiency as productivity that describes a significant relationship between few of the
factors such as performance, technology and management quality. The use of these methods
helped in evaluating the correlation with the other indicators of the quality proposed by the
government. The research analyzes the postal service that is implemented in 159 countries where
from each state two letters to the five largest cities were sent to an invalid address (Osei-Kyei &
Chan, 2015). The use of these measures was also used for putting the argument that low public
sector productivity is partly analyzed by the similar factors as that exited within the private
sectors). Based on international conventions that is being agreed upon by the specific nations
where any undelivered mail must be returned within a stipulated time to the origin country
(Roman & Miller, 2015). It is important for the concerned governments to work on their desire
strategies and increase the reliability of the various work processes so as to bring out the positive
results which finally gives rise to the development of the entire country.
Summary of the approach, methodology and main findings
The key findings based on the particular study is related to technology that explains 30%
of the difference in one standard deviation change and mail return efficiency rates in Weber
bureaucracy index changes output per employee by 108%. A development in the non-political
bureaucracy and the quality of professional increases an output higher than the double in
comparison with the raised development in closed bureaucracy. The other statistically important
Document Page
3
variables involves the employees of public sector acts impartially and the public sector workers
who works with the spirit of providing public service. By observing the productivity of
supplying services the gauging government efficiency provides with the same outputs that are
generally used by the existing practices at the time of preparing the research immune into the
political affinity of the survey related to the respondents. The research provides the fact that
government efficiency increases if the quality of management is developed in the public sector
similar to private sector. An alternative measure concerning the capital stock was also considered
with the number of offices based on per capita (Johnson, Leenders & McCue, 2017). The
management quality throughout the public, as well as the private sectors, are obtained
considering the different sources and these help in explaining the preferred variation in the pots
productivity across various countries (Torchia, Calabrò & Morner, 2015).
Strengths and weaknesses of the study
Strengths
The research focuses upon the outcomes that helps to meet the efficiency of a specific
service. Earlier researchers entirely depend upon the surveys that differs as per the sample size
and the political affinity of the respondents. Thus, the research is not considering itself to be
holistic in any aspect. Within, the study the researchers determines a range of various
comprehensive factors that may put an impact on the returning of the mail to the developing
countries (Chong, La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes & Shleifer, 2014). It may put an impact on USA
that involves attitudes or the religious views of the country towards USA. Ultimately for 159
states the study implements a service that will follow the similar global convention.
Weaknesses
The study possess few of the weaknesses based on government efficiency. Within the
particular study the research the researcher adopts a non-political opinion of a political entity
which is considered to be government. The researcher’s views government as a service provider
that best suits to the Eurocentric belief (Davis & Metcalf, 2016). This particular factor might not
be evident in other such cases where government efficiency and bureaucracy consist of more
components as compared to service delivery.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
4
Discussion of the implications of the study
The particular measures of the quality of management in the private as well as public
sectors demonstrate the differences in the postal productivity all over the country. This will
increase the postal productivity in private as well as the public sectors. It is observed from the
study that college education and per capita income has removed the statistical significance and
reduced the size of the management variables (Lavertu, 2016). In 159 countries the study had
adopted the measures of government efficiency based on the return of incorrect addressed
universal mail. The measures help in correlating with other factors of the government service
that proves to be advantageous. It used another measure that finds a relationship between low
public sector productivity and the factors discussed in the private sector. It documented a range
of management variables that will help in finding a difference between postal efficiency
(Djankov, Nikolova & Zilinsky, 2016). It is observed that government efficiency could be
improved by paying less attention to the non-political factors such as, well management of the
bureaucracy and investing in the technology. It can be seen that the adoption of corruption could
be a significant problem for the developing countries that will lead to poor management of
government services. Corruption could be considered to be a weakness for incentive and
monitoring systems.
Conclusion
The paper concluded by assuming government efficiency as productivity that is based on
management quality and technology. It provided with the specific key findings that provides with
the difference in the return efficiency and standard deviation change. Therefore, the paper
explained the research study along with the summary of the approach, methodology and main
findings. It also focused upon the strengths and weaknesses of the study based on the return of
incorrect international letters. It is noticed that the strengths and weaknesses puts a direct impact
on the developing countries like USA. Moreover, the paper provided with the implications based
on the research study.
Document Page
5
References
Chong, A., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2014). Letter grading government
efficiency. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(2), 277-298.
Davis, L. W., & Metcalf, G. E. (2016). Does better information lead to better choices? Evidence
from energy-efficiency labels. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource
Economists, 3(3), 589-625.
Djankov, S., Nikolova, E., & Zilinsky, J. (2016). The happiness gap in Eastern Europe. Journal
of Comparative Economics, 44(1), 108-124.
Johnson, P. F., Leenders, M. R., & McCue, C. (2017). A comparison of purchasing’s
organizational roles and responsibilities in the public and private sector. Journal of
Public Procurement, 3(1), 57-74.
Lavertu, S. (2016). We all need help:“Big data” and the mismeasure of public
administration. Public administration review, 76(6), 864-872.
Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. (2015). Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. International Journal of
Project Management, 33(6), 1335-1346.
Roman, A. V., & Miller, H. T. (2015). New questions for e-government: Efficiency but not
(yet?) democracy. In Public Affairs and Administration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools,
and Applications (pp. 2209-2227). IGI Global.
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Morner, M. (2015). Public-private partnerships in the health care
sector: A systematic review of the literature. Public Management Review, 17(2), 236-261.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 6
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]