Evidence Summary on Hand Hygiene

Evidence Summary
Table
© Osborne, SR 2019 revised
SEARCH QUESTION/TOPIC:
Author (s)
(date)
Study Design
Question Domain
Key information Validity Check
(eg bias)
Author’s
Results/Findings
Author’s
Conclusions
Reviewer
Comments
(Your appraisal)
Evidence Source No. 1
Ahmad
Jamal, GO’
Grady, E
Harnett, D
Dalton, D
Andersen
Date: 2
December
2011
Purpose: achievement
of a sustainable
improvement in hand
hygiene rates and
reduces the rates of
infections.
P: Risk of infirmary
developed
contaminations
Not Biased It was seen that the
development of hand
wash was continuous
since the last 4 years in
the sphere of hand
hygiene A failure in the
arena of hospital learned
contaminations. Regular
usage of alcohol-based
hand rub has augmented
from 16 litres/1000 bed
days to 51 litres/1000 bed
days throughout this
same phase.
The plan distributes the
continued development in
sanitation of hands
agreement by founding a
summary of varied proof-
based policies
This project is efficient in
terms of study, research
and research.
I: Hand hygiene
method
C: Conforming with
hand hygiene
Design: Qualitative
Level: I
Domain: Hand Hygiene O: Decrease of
hospital acquired
contaminations
Evidence Source No. 2
Azzam El
Kadi and
Sajad
Ahmad
Salati
Date: 13
August 2012
Purpose: measure the
undergraduate
medicinal nursing
students’ awareness
and submission for
hand sanitation
P: Threat of
developed
infections in
hospitals.
Not Biased The regular cognizance
concerning the optimistic
suggestions of hand
hygiene.
Hence it was found that
grave efforts are to be
given for improving the
hygiene practices in hand
cleaning within the
medical students
The Authors of the given
Journal worked upon
nursing and medical
students for better
outcomes.
I: Procedure of
Hand Hygiene
C: Compatible with
sanitation
Design: Qualitative
Level: I
Domain: Hand Hygiene
in hospitals of Australia
O: Reduction of the
infection acquired
by hospitals
Evid
e Anson
Kendall,
Timothy
Landers,
Purpose: Improving
Hand Hygiene
P: Threat of
developed
infections in
hospitals.
Not Biased General agreement
augmented from 42% to
61%. Augmented
The POC solutions must
be provided to the HCW’s
to performing hygiene
Results in this Article are
efficiently explained and
research study was well

Evidence Summary
Table
© Osborne, SR 2019 revised
nce Source
No. 3
Jane Kirk,
Elizabeth
Young
Year: 2012
submission was seen
amongst all specialized
groups.
related to hands
programs while being in
the zone of the patients
and in the curtail instants
when the patients are in
most vulnerable situation
of acquiring an infection.
established.
I: Procedure of
Hand Hygiene
C: Compatible with
sanitation
Design: Qualitative
Level: I
Domain: Hand
Sanitation compliance in
Australia
O: Reduction of the
infection acquired
by hospitals
GUIDE Author (date): include all authors and date of publication
Study design: include purpose, study design , domain, and level of evidence (LOE) using JBI
Key information: include population/patients (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), outcomes
measured (O)
Validity check: include issues with methodology, rigour, potential for bias –eg validity, reliability
Results/Findings: include generally favorable or unfavorable, specific outcomes of
interest, estimates of experimental effect, if appropriate
Author Conclusions: author’s interpretation of findings; include limitations, implication for
practice and research) if appropriate
Reviewer Comments: include potential for bias, weaknesses and strengths of study design,
applicability