ProductsLogo
LogoStudy Documents
LogoAI Grader
LogoAI Answer
LogoAI Code Checker
LogoPlagiarism Checker
LogoAI Paraphraser
LogoAI Quiz
LogoAI Detector
PricingBlogAbout Us
logo

Executing and Closing projects - Sydney Opera House

Verified

Added on  2023/03/17

|15
|1363
|88
Presentation
AI Summary
This presentation provides an overview of the execution and closing of the Sydney Opera House project. It discusses the construction timeline, budget, and challenges faced during the project. It also explores the control systems used for cost, schedule, scope, and quality. The presentation analyzes the reasons for cost and time overruns and examines the role of stakeholders. Additionally, it suggests project management actions that could have been taken to better control the project.

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
Executing and Closing projects
SYDNEY OPERA HOUSE

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Introduction to the project
Construction initiated in 1959
Project was actually scheduled for four years
along with a budget of AUS $7 million
Completion of the project cost AUS $102 million
Completion of the project exceeded the actual
deadline
Client changed the plan in the middle
Document Page
The range of used control systems for cost, schedule,
scope and quality
That government of New South Wales decided to
invest $100,000 in the project as it felt it had an
obligation to public to choose the existing affairs
Cost of project estimated $5.5 million but the initial
cost of stage 1 was estimated around AUD$1.3 but
this has increased to $2.5 million and by the first
stage works left 47 weeks behind schedule and it was
over the budget
There is a large gap between the actual cost and the
estimated cost of the project
Document Page
Contd...
Almost 233 entries were received from 32 different
nations
Half 3000 seats as well as a small hall for almost
1200 people and each was supposed to be designed
for different categories of use with the inclusion of
full scale opera, orchestral and choral concern,
lecture and mass meeting, bullet performance and
lecture

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Analysis of the reasons that explaining the cost and/or
time overruns encountered during the project
Initial stage effectively claimed extra cost of AUD$1.2 million in 1962 because of the
changes in design but when the project was accomplishment
It had cost an estimated amount of AUS$5.2 million
Stakeholder Utzon submitted an updated estimate of overall project which cost as
AUD$1.2 million
Utzon was under bankruptcy during the making of the project
Document Page
Contd..
Utzon submitted an updated estimate of overall project which cost as AUD$1.2
million
Freeman, (2017) argued that stage II certainly slowed down the progress of the
project in 1996
Consequently, Uzton walked out of the project, the stakeholder did not leave any sort
of design or the sketches to work with as the this stakeholders did not leave the
sketch to work because he was convinced
Document Page
Extent to which the project execution team could be
held responsible for time and cost overruns
Government of the nation is probably a definitive stakeholder, showing power,
legitimacy, urgency because they were given the responsibly of facilitating the
creation of such project
Angus, Flett and Bowers (2005) mentioned that stakeholders who were involved in
the investment planning and the construction engineers who planned the projects
were the major stakeholders
Final product has successfully met the demands and expectation of Opera goers and
the architectural community of the world and of course the expectation of Australian
Government. Gann and Salter (1998) sated the fat that Australia government
recouped the enormous cost after only two years.

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Difference between actual cost and time
and estimated ones
Document Page
Relationship between the problems I have identified in section 3
above and the stakeholders’ needs and influence
Although, cost and time were two big issues, it received a tremendous attention from the global
audience
As put forward by Gann and Salter (1998), one of the major stakeholder is client who was
basically the state of New South Wales which is in fact the Australian Govt. So, this stakeholder
groups started the project but ultimately become an obstacle in the timely completion of project
by determining changes to existing plans
Document Page
Contd..
Major client of the project changed the existing plan in the middle due to the delay
in first two theatre
Major relation which was missing in the project is the interactive relations between
project team and the demands of client
Sydney Opera House Committee were not aware of the technical needs for building
up the project
The project execution team wanted to finish the project within the given time period
but gap of technical expertise remained as the challenge.

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Project management actions that could have
been taken to better control
Sydney Opera House is more of a well-developed team of architect, engineers and
constructors
None of the individuals in the execution of the team and even in the external environment
have predicted what could have happened and this scenario gradually and ironically
proved to be a major issue during the construction
Cost as AUS $12.5 million and as more payment were being delivered and no visible
progress was observed, the government of the nation started to withdraw payments to
Stakeholder
Document Page
Contd..
Knowledge and skill tools should be applied to complete the project. Had this knowledge and
skills are applied to the project, it would have taken shorter to complete the project as well as
within budget affecting the quality
Developing a management principle is highly critical because it is majorly concerned with the
development of communication and reporting procedures
Communication of the project status could be applied in the existing stage as well and it can
inform the team about the financial status and time required
Document Page
Contd..
Initiation activities such as searching a better site location for the project and this could
lead to development of an effective project initiation plan which could further help to
define the activities needed to organize team but they should be working to define the
goals and scope of the project
Developing a management principle is highly critical because it is majorly concerned with
the development of communication and reporting procedures

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Conclusion
Sydney Opera House would have cost far much less than it eventually did and would
have taken a shorter time to accomplish, had the basic principle of project
management been applied and followed
Opera House is an iconic building in Sydney as well as symbol of Australia
It is more of having a proper project management throughout the project starting
from stage one to end of the project
Document Page
Bibliography
Anbari, F. T., Carayannis, E. G., & Voetsch, R. J. (2008). Post-project reviews as a key project management
competence. Technovation, 28(10), 633-643.
Angus, G. Y., Flett, P. D., & Bowers, J. A. (2005). Developing a value-centred proposal for assessing project
success. International Journal of Project Management, 23(6), 428-436.
Bereson, R. (2003). The operatic state: cultural policy and the opera house. Routledge.
Colbert, F. (2003). The sydney opera house: an Australian icon. International Journal of Arts Management, 5, 69-77.
Freeman, C. G. (2017). Participatory culture and the social value of an architectural icon: Sydney Opera House. Routledge.
Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. (1998). Learning and innovation management in project-based, service-enhanced
firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2(04), 431-454.
Hale, P., & Macdonald, S. (2005). The Sydney Opera House: An Evolving Icon. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 11(2),
7-22.
Howsawi, E. M., Eager, D., & Bagia, R. (2011, December). Understanding project success: The four-level project success
framework. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 620-624).
IEEE.
Howsawi, E., Eager, D., Bagia, R., & Niebecker, K. (2014). The four-level project success framework: application and
assessment. Organisational Project Management, 1(1), 1-15.
1 out of 15
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]