Exercise Physiology Abstract Analysis 2022

Running head: EXERCISE PHSIOLOGY ABSTRACT 1
Exercise Physiology Abstract
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

EXERCISE PHSIOLOGY ABSTRACT 2
Source
Ramos, J. S., Dalleck, L. C., Tjonna, A. E., Beetham, K. S., & Coombes, J. S. (2015). The
impact of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous
training on vascular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports
medicine, 45(5), 679-692.
The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training
on Vascular Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Purposes
The purpose of the study was to perform a systematic review of the evidence and quantification
of High- intensity internal training on vascular function in comparison with moderate-intensity
continuous training
Method
PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase are the three electronic databases that were searched (latest May
2014) for the purposes of attempts that randomly aimed at comparing the effect of HIIT and
MICT on vascular function for two weeks. HIIT protocols involved aerobic exercises that were
predominantly carried out with high intensity, combined with passive and active time of
recovering. Comparison of the differences in mean (vascular function assessed through brachial
artery flow-mediated dilation from the bottom to post intervention between HIIT and MICT)
was done through a meta-analysis. The HIIT versus MICT impact on CRF, risk factors to CVD,
and biomarkers connected to vascular function was also reviewed across various studies.
Markers included insulin resistance, inflammation and oxidative.