logo

Report on Exploring the Paradigms of War

   

Added on  2020-05-01

10 Pages2830 Words39 Views
 | 
 | 
 | 
Running head: EXPLORING THE PARADIGMS OF WAR1Exploring the Paradigms of WarName Institution
Report on Exploring the Paradigms of War_1

EXPLORING THE PARADIGMS OF WAR2Exploring the Paradigms of WarStrategic choices are related to organizational success. This is shown in instances where organizations that make choices strategically end up being more efficient that those that do not make strategic decisions. There are also different deterministic theories that aid in explaining how organizations work. Some of these theories include; Resource Dependency Theory and the Institutional Theory. Population ecology also assists in explaining the different organization actions and outcomes (Söderberg, 2013).Philosophically, determinism states that all events are determined by causes that were previously in existence. These take different factors into account such as moral choices. It is said to preclude human free will. This is because it entails that humans cannot act in a manner that is different from the way in which they normally do(Silvestre, 2016). Conversely, indeterminism holds the view that some of the events in the universe do not have a cause that is deterministic but they simply occur at random. In turn, this brings in a moral responsibility and leads to the creation of an external cause that is deterrent, and that can then affect the actions that will take place after that.Therefore, determinism says that all actions are as a result of preceding factors and this makes behavior unpredictable. Science is based on this causal law of determinism. On the contrary, free will is the human ability to choose the manner in which they will behave which means that they are self-determined (Fekadu, 2014). Incidentally, people choose whether they willcommit a certain crime or not. The Resource Dependence Theory arose from the work of Gerald Salancik and Jeffrey Pfeffer in the year 1978. This theory is made up of different arguments. First, it says that organizations have power over a focal firm. As a result, the organizations can influence the way in which different firms behave, if they have control of the vital resources in the firms’ ongoing
Report on Exploring the Paradigms of War_2

EXPLORING THE PARADIGMS OF WAR3operations and if these resources cannot be acquired elsewhere (Narain, 2014). Second, the external environment of an organization is made up of other organizations which have their specific interests and objectives(Drees & Heugens, 2013).Resource dependence also helps organizations to come up with strategies that can be usedin dealing with dependence relationships that are problematic. The resource dependence theory, therefore, relies on the principle that organizations need to interact with other organizations that are in its environment with the aim of acquiring resources (Biermann & Harsch, 2016). These transactions are beneficial to the different organizations but they may also bring about dependencies that are not good. The resources that are required by organizations are scarce and may not be readily available. These resources may also be controlled by actors who are uncooperative. This in turn may bring unequal exchanges and result in power differences. To reduce these high dependency levels that may be in existence, it is paramount for organizations to develop strategies that will enhance their position when it comes to bargaining in transactions where these resources are involved. These strategies may include; development oflinks with other organizations, diversifying their production, increasing their production levels, and making use of political actions(Singha, Sum & Chuong, 2011). Diversification is an important strategy because it will result in a reduction of the dependence levels that an organization has with other firms, and it will also increase its leverage and power. Making use of political actions is also a good strategy because it will bring in government control which will reduce the monopoly power of these organizations that have power and get rid of any cartels that may be in existence.
Report on Exploring the Paradigms of War_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Organizational Theory: Exploring Paradigm Wars
|11
|2798
|77

Exploring the Paradigm Wars in Organization Theory
|13
|3334
|267

Exploring the Paradigm Wars in Organization Theory
|11
|2827
|477

Exploring the Paradigm Wars in Organisation Theory
|7
|2421
|356

The Prominent Role of Managers in Influencing Organization Outcomes
|11
|2608
|251

Exploring the Paradigm Wars in Organizational Theory: Strategic Choice Vs Deterministic Theories
|11
|2830
|258