EXPOSITORY CRITIQUE 11 EXPOSITORY CRITIQUE 11 EXPOSITORY CRITIQUE 11

Running head: EXPOSITORY CRITIQUE 1
EXPOSITORY CRITIQUE
Student’s Name
Institution
Date

EXPOSITORY CRITIQUE 2
Table of Content
PART (B) EPOSITRY CRITIQUE
Introduction 3
Title, Authors and Abstract 3
Literature review 4
Quantitative data collection 4
Quantitative data analysis 5
Qualitative method 6
Design 6
Qualitative data collection 6
Qualitative data analysis 7
Findings 7
Conclusion of the article 9
References 10

EXPOSITORY CRITIQUE 3
Introduction
Expository critique is a way of analyzing research work. Relevance and reliability of the
data to the question of the research are determined through this analysis. The commentary, also
known as critical appraisal, is the process that evaluates the research (Gupta, 2016). Occasionally
it outlines the strength and weaknesses of the article
Title, Author, and Abstract
The title perfectly reflects on the content shown in the article. It is well structured to
indicate all the significant agendas discussed in the article. Dragana Simin is the principal author.
He is a well-known color research and application nurse.
Furthermore, he is also a nursing tutor. He has a proper understanding of the topic in
question. He also has research skills. That means the research work done is quality and can be
trusted for an academic reference. Fellow authors are also medical practitioners. Their combined
effort to come up with the article gives it credit. Objectives, as well as the background
information, are well outlined in the abstract.
The research was designed to be undertaken in a prospective observational manner. The
method used was the observation of patients from many tertiary healthcare institutions about the
occurrence of the infection. There is a literature review of data collected in hospitals by nurses.
There is a gap in the literature review because the phenomenon is rare. The presence of
comorbidity is highlighted after analysis of multivariate. During the first day, the researchers
were able to single out a 20-gauge catheter. They were also able to notice that the medium stage
of phlebitis is the most common. The middle stage is also seen to be the most severe of all the
other stages. They also noticed that 2-grade was the most common infiltration. Results were also

EXPOSITORY CRITIQUE 4
well featured in the abstract. Infiltration and phlebitis are the leading complications caused by
therapy. Inclusion of the conclusion and stat the relevance of the article to the question matter
perfected the abstract.
Literature Review
Several relevant articles were used in the study. Most of them were updated; therefore,
the current trend was taken note of. All the stated gaps in the literature review were identified.
The gaps were caused by lack of sufficient scientific research work. This was due to the lack of
documentation on the procedures. The developing country lacked funds for scientific research.
The number of cases reported about the complication was also significantly low.
The research was aimed at determining incidences, severity, and risk factors of
peripheral intravenous cannula‐induced complications. One of the minimally invasive
procedures in hospitalized patients is the Peripheral venous cannulation. (Boston et al.,2014). It
is prevalent because of its invasive nature. The research is aimed at proving the close relationship
between the procedure and other complications, and its overall failure is always high.
Quantitative Data Collection
Data were collected through observation prospective of patients infected with the
infectious disease for six months. The researchers compiled data from a clinic offering
healthcare. Nurses in the clinic also helped in collecting data by providing previously
documented data. Data collected is adequately described. All the united that were collected are
well stated in numeric figures against their relevant categories. Sampling approach was used