Extreme Measures Movie Analysis Assignment 2022
VerifiedAdded on 2022/08/12
|4
|678
|16
Assignment
AI Summary
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: EXTREME MEASURES MOVIE ANALYSIS
EXTREME MEASURES MOVIE ANALYSIS
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:
EXTREME MEASURES MOVIE ANALYSIS
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1EXTREME MEASURES MOVIE ANALYSIS
Human beings have corporeal as well as non- corporeal aspects present within their
psyche. It is said that human beings are embodied spirits with inspirited bodies; or to put in
simple terms human have minded bodies and embodied minds. There are many arguments
regarding this alleged duality; this duality is relatively easy to assert on the humans but is very
hard to understand. Hence there is no such evidence that would prove or declare that any one of
either the mind or the body is our “real” identity. As per the identity of a person, it is about both
positive and the negative traits within an individual. There is a difference between “me” and “I”
when it is put in context of consciousness (Mandal et al. 2016). The word ‘me’ reflects the self
as an object of experience, whereas, the word ‘I’ corresponds to the self as the subject of the
experience.
The movie Extreme Measures is all about presenting complete conundrum of ethics and
morality between the dilemmas of what is best for an individual and what is best for masses. The
character Dr. Guy Luthan, who is also the protagonist, faces this same dilemma with serious
choices and these choices dictate the moral belief of the protagonist. If any other person in place
of Dr. Luthan, he/she might have done the same thing as the protagonist, since the character of
Dr. Luthan has been set as an example of a person with deontological reasoning because of the
way he opposes the act of Dr. Myrick. However, if I was in place of the character of Dr. Luthan
and asked to do “anything” to regain mobility I would have hesitated to attempt anything that
would seriously question my moral beliefs. I think I would choose to live with the disability
rather than doing something that would taint my psyche and make me question my decision for
the rest of the days of my life. It is partly because of the obsession of Dr. Luthan that he could do
what he did for regaining his mobility.
Human beings have corporeal as well as non- corporeal aspects present within their
psyche. It is said that human beings are embodied spirits with inspirited bodies; or to put in
simple terms human have minded bodies and embodied minds. There are many arguments
regarding this alleged duality; this duality is relatively easy to assert on the humans but is very
hard to understand. Hence there is no such evidence that would prove or declare that any one of
either the mind or the body is our “real” identity. As per the identity of a person, it is about both
positive and the negative traits within an individual. There is a difference between “me” and “I”
when it is put in context of consciousness (Mandal et al. 2016). The word ‘me’ reflects the self
as an object of experience, whereas, the word ‘I’ corresponds to the self as the subject of the
experience.
The movie Extreme Measures is all about presenting complete conundrum of ethics and
morality between the dilemmas of what is best for an individual and what is best for masses. The
character Dr. Guy Luthan, who is also the protagonist, faces this same dilemma with serious
choices and these choices dictate the moral belief of the protagonist. If any other person in place
of Dr. Luthan, he/she might have done the same thing as the protagonist, since the character of
Dr. Luthan has been set as an example of a person with deontological reasoning because of the
way he opposes the act of Dr. Myrick. However, if I was in place of the character of Dr. Luthan
and asked to do “anything” to regain mobility I would have hesitated to attempt anything that
would seriously question my moral beliefs. I think I would choose to live with the disability
rather than doing something that would taint my psyche and make me question my decision for
the rest of the days of my life. It is partly because of the obsession of Dr. Luthan that he could do
what he did for regaining his mobility.
2EXTREME MEASURES MOVIE ANALYSIS
At the end of the movie, Dr. Luthan receives a package with all the medical researches of
Dr, Myrick with a decision at his hands whether or not carry on the act that Dr. Myrick started. It
is left as a mystery in the movie; however, I think that Dr, Myrick is a person, who believes in
Utilitarianism and according to this belief; Dr. Myrick had a belief that any act is appropriate if it
ends up benefitting majority of people. But Dr. Luthan combats this point of view throughout the
movie; hence I believe he decided not to carry on following the steps of the antagonist. As per
my opinion he should not follow the ideology of utilitarianism blindly and attempt anything
immoral for the greater good (Paquette et al. 2015). As a matter of fact, Dr. Luthan himself
showed that he does not believe in the fact that humans should be treated simply as the medium
to an end. His deontological ideology would not make him attempt such an act.
At the end of the movie, Dr. Luthan receives a package with all the medical researches of
Dr, Myrick with a decision at his hands whether or not carry on the act that Dr. Myrick started. It
is left as a mystery in the movie; however, I think that Dr, Myrick is a person, who believes in
Utilitarianism and according to this belief; Dr. Myrick had a belief that any act is appropriate if it
ends up benefitting majority of people. But Dr. Luthan combats this point of view throughout the
movie; hence I believe he decided not to carry on following the steps of the antagonist. As per
my opinion he should not follow the ideology of utilitarianism blindly and attempt anything
immoral for the greater good (Paquette et al. 2015). As a matter of fact, Dr. Luthan himself
showed that he does not believe in the fact that humans should be treated simply as the medium
to an end. His deontological ideology would not make him attempt such an act.
3EXTREME MEASURES MOVIE ANALYSIS
References:
Mandal, Jharna, Dinoop Korol Ponnambath, and Subhash Chandra Parija. "Utilitarian and
deontological ethics in medicine." Tropical parasitology 6.1 (2016): 5.
Paquette, Michael, Erich J. Sommerfeldt, and Michael L. Kent. "Do the ends justify the means?
Dialogue, development communication, and deontological ethics." Public Relations
Review 41.1 (2015): 30-39.
References:
Mandal, Jharna, Dinoop Korol Ponnambath, and Subhash Chandra Parija. "Utilitarian and
deontological ethics in medicine." Tropical parasitology 6.1 (2016): 5.
Paquette, Michael, Erich J. Sommerfeldt, and Michael L. Kent. "Do the ends justify the means?
Dialogue, development communication, and deontological ethics." Public Relations
Review 41.1 (2015): 30-39.
1 out of 4
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.