False Memories and Their Impact on Eyewitness Testimony

This presentation discusses false memories and their impact on eyewitness testimony. It explains what false memories are and how they can affect the accuracy of eyewitness accounts. The presentation also explores why eyewitness testimonies should not carry too much weight in criminal proceedings. References are provided for further reading.

False Memories
Institution
Name

False memory and false memory experiments
A false memory may be referred as being a distorted and fabricated recollection
of a particular event. False memory is the involvement of the mind which is
incorrectly regarded as a veridical symbol for any event in someone’s past
(Goldstein, 2014). The experiments on false memory stay used in the past of any
person. False memories affects always some special or normal distracters.

False memory can affect the eyewitness testimony
Research in this situation is assumed by the cognitive for community, and the
permissible or forensic psychologists. Eyewitness testimony may involve uncertain
things, this can be from the interviews that seem suspicious, the confessions which
are untrue, the consequent impartiality failures and discoveries of dishonesty in the
meetings. Memory for the proceedings for an eyewitnesses is one of the areas of
special interest.

The observers and the victims that are affected by corruption are exposed in the validation of the
imposing errors of reminiscence, this has consequences in the belongings as being considerable
as the belief of the factual individuals found not guilty (Read & Connolly, 2007).

How false memory influences eyewitness
The testimony of the eyewitness in this investigation would addresses all the
features of the process, this includes the method of events which appear to be
apparent, and what results when the observers explain to the rules enforcement
specialists about what they had heard or observed on the scene of robbery, in
addition to the creation of the identity of committer of the crime, and in the
courtroom.

There may be also existence of additional complexities involving the observers when they are
brood or disabled, or when they heard a bit or did not master the crime as it happened
(Newman & Lindsay, 2009).

Why the testimonies of eyewitness should or should not carry weight in
criminal proceedings
The testimonies of the eyewitness should not convey a lot of weight in the
minutes of criminal proceedings since the investigation to the testimony of the
witness involves the educational psychology of how the observers of corruption
perceives the proceedings or recalls the events, and accounts them in the legal
processes(Radvansky & Ashcraft, 2013).

Reporting of the eyewitness events
The memory of eyewitnesses is the periodic retention of an individual for
a particular crime or a melodramatic occurrence which they have observed. The
testimonies of the observer repeatedly relies on the system of judiciary (Newman
& Lindsay, 2009). The procedures includes laboratory Investigations on
propensity to the proposal of the memory of the eyewitness. Assessing the prose
reveal the three different methods to examine susceptibility of the suggestion of
the witness intelligence memory.

Another method is built-up in the basic recollection study setting about the particular
situations which may lead to the development of false memories . The investigations
serves cautionary to the memories of the eyewitness which comprises of the
schematically dependable particulars which are not knowledgeable perceptually.

References
Goldstein, E. B. (2014). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research and
everyday experience. Nelson Education.
Newman, E. J., & Lindsay, D. S. (2009). False memories: What the hell are they
for?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol I , 23(8), 1105-1121.

Ashcraft, M. H., & Radvansky, G. A. (2013). Cognition: Pearson New
International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed. Retrieved from
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195396607/obo-
9780195396607-0086.xml
Read, J. D., & Connolly, A. (2007). The effects of delay on long-term memory for witnessed
events (pp. 117-155). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.