Federal Response to Hurricane Harvey Disaster in Texas
Verified
Added on 2023/04/23
|4
|910
|391
AI Summary
This article discusses the federal response to Hurricane Harvey disaster in Texas. It covers the collaboration between agencies, FEMA's role, and the effectiveness criteria used by FEMA. It also includes references for further reading.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: FEDERAL RESPONSE TO THE DISASTER ‘HARVEY’ FEDERAL RESPONSE TO THE DISASTER ‘HARVEY’ Name of the Student Course Name and Number Instructor’s Name Date of Submission:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1FEDERAL RESPONSE TO THE DISASTER ‘HARVEY’ Hurricane Harvey is one of the most disastrous event in the history of USA. Harvey touched the USA soil near Rockport, Texas on 25thAugust, 2017(Ratnapradipa et al., 2018). Harvey was a major category 4 hurricane (Ratnapradipa et al., 2018). The storm causes heavy rainfall in Texas in the next week after landfall. Houston recorded 24 inch of rain in just 48 hours (Ratnapradipa et al., 2018). Along with that, Texas also observed record amount of rainfall near clear creek which was 49.06 inch of rain (Ratnapradipa et al., 2018). This heavy rainfall causes major flooding in the Texas state. Harvey caused very strong wind which reached the speed of 130 mph (Ratnapradipa et al., 2018). Almost 136,000 structure were flooded as a direct consequences of this and 38 people died as result of the storm (Ratnapradipa et al., 2018). Owing to this, almost 780,000 people were evacuated and 692 emergency shelters were used to temporarily house 42,000 people (Ratnapradipa et al., 2018). More than 100,000 Texans had at least 5 inch of water in their homes (Ratnapradipa et al., 2018). FEMA or Federal Emergency Management Agency hadpreparedfor this storm and pre- positioned personnel and supplies in Texas before the landfall of Harvey. FEMA joined forces with local agencies, Texas Division of Emergency Management and other non- profit organisations. Along with that, President Donald Trump has issued a declaration which allows other federal agencies to joined forces with them. Almost 31,000 personnel were deployed to help in rescue and recovery which included National Guard and FEMA employees (Fema.gov, 2017). First responders to this emergency situation rescued almost 122,331 individuals excluding pets and animals (Fema.gov, 2017). This number does not include the individuals and pets rescued by residents of Texas during this ghastly disaster. The recovery and rescueresponseof Harvey was one of biggest and largest operation in the history of FEMA. More than 1.5 billion US dollar were used to pay the affected Texans from federal funds (Fema.gov, 2017). 571.8 million US dollar were allocated by FEMA for basic
2FEDERAL RESPONSE TO THE DISASTER ‘HARVEY’ home repairs and temporary housing facilities (Fema.gov, 2017). More than eighty seven thousand flood insurances were claimed by Texans and NFIP or National Flood Insurance Program expedited 608 million US dollar in claim payments (Fema.gov, 2017). Although, many agencies have been collaboratively working in this rescue and recovery operation, FEMA coordinated the total operation. Most significant action which helped andwent right for the rescue and recovery operation for hurricane Harvey is that the collaboration between the agencies. FEMA officials and Texas State Government officials have acknowledges that this collaboration helped them immensely to provide food and shelter to the affected individuals in the first nine days (GAO, 2018). Additionally, President Donald Trump also accepted the request of Texas governor for pre- positioning of emergency forces in Texas before landfall. This also quickened the recovery response. One aspect that did affect the recovery response is that the severity of the hurricane Harvey. The sheer severity of the storm and rainfalldelayed the response. FEMA or Federal Emergency Management Agency uses few criteria to determine the effectiveness of similar kind of future disasters. The planning criteria are key response capabilities, emergency operations plan, essential functions and trainings and exercises (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2017). Emergency Operation Plan (EOP) ensures that the aftermath of a disaster is safe by describing and identifying appropriate process for the corresponding situation (www.dhs.gov, 2019).
3FEDERAL RESPONSE TO THE DISASTER ‘HARVEY’ References Fema.gov. (2017). Historic Disaster Response to Hurricane Harvey in Texas | FEMA.gov. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/news-release/2017/09/22/historic-disaster- response-hurricane-harvey-texas GAO. (2018).2017 Hurricanes And Wildfires. United States Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/694231.pdf National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017).Strengthening the Disaster Resilience of the Academic Biomedical Research Community: Protecting the Nation's Investment. National Academies Press. Ratnapradipa, D., Cardinal, C., Ratnapradipa, K. L., Scarbrough, A., & Xie, Y. (2018). Implications of Hurricane Harvey on Environmental Public Health in Harris County, Texas.Journal of Environmental Health,81(2). www.dhs.gov. (2019). Written testimony of S&T Under Secretary for a House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology hearing titled “A Review of Progress by the Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate”. Retrieved from https://www.dhs.gov/news/2015/10/27/written-testimony-st-under-secretary- house-committee-science-space-and-technology