Case Study: Fetal Abnormality: Applying Moral Theory

Running head: CASE STUDY: FETAL ABNORMALITY
Case Study: Fetal Abnormality
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

Running head: CASE STUDY: FETAL ABNORMALITY
Case Study Fetal Abnormality: Applying Moral Theory
Introduction
Four individuals are represented in the “Case Study: Fatal Abnormality.” These people,
Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson, present their views feelings regarding aborting a fetus. In
this particular case, Jessica is expectant with a fetus considered to be having a 25% chance of
Down Syndrome. The fetus has not developed any arm, and there is a low probability that the
arms will be developed. Marco, Jessica’s husband, supports her decision, but Maria being a
religious aunt is against the decision on religious grounds that she has an obligation to God and
the unborn child. On the other and, Dr. Wilson has advised the couples to go for abortion. The
four individuals pose different theories to ascertain the moral status of the fetus.
Identification of Theories Used by Those Involved
Jessica’s Theory
The final decision lies with Jessica, and she has two options: terminal terminating the
pregnancy or keeping it and continue with motherhood. In the case that she continues with
motherhood and gives birth to an abnormal, there will be no doubt the socioeconomic position of
the family will be misbalanced, and it may be hard to manage in future. On the other hand, her
decision may be based on the theory of feminism if she goes for the removal of the termination
of the pregnancy. According to the theory of feminism, there are two options at her disposal:
either to abstain from sexual intercourse or to completely remove her womb. However, since the
mother has no sole rights of abortion, the theory of feminism is not logical (Bessinger & Kuhne,
2002). It is has been noted that most abortions are done on the basis of sex.
Marco’s Theory

Running head: CASE STUDY: FETAL ABNORMALITY
Marco supports whatever decisions Jessica makes. His stand seconds feminism, whereby
the mother’s rights supersede the rights of the fetus. However, he is to blame for not ensuring
Jessica got medical aid in her initial months of pregnancy. I would say that Marcos is also
utilizing the relationship theory by trying to balance between terminating the kid and maintaining
the kid in regards (Cunningham, 2006). He is ready to go with the decision Jessica will take.
However, Marcos cannot help thinking about the financial strain that the child will bring if
Jessica decided to continue with motherhood (Dunn, 2010). If the child grows, he/she will not
have full cognitive properties.
Maria’s Theory
I would tie two theories when it comes to aunt Maria: these are the relationship theory
and the moral bureau theory. The theory of moral bureau comes is portrayed when aunt Maria is
borne upon God in the equivalence of being a factor in the purpose and decision of the contriving
procedure for both Marco and Jessica in regards to the fetus abortion. Maria’s thought is that
God intends the gestation to go on. According to her, God is right about all His creation, and it
would be seen as evil if Jessica and Marco would consider going along with the abortion based
on Exodus 20:13 (Durham, 2018),“Though shalt not kill.” According to the relationship theory
as being utilized by Aunt Maria, there is already a bond between Jessica and the unborn fetus. It
can be seen by Jessica’s obligation as a mother, going for pregnancy tests and keeping fit for the
sake of the developing fetus. She advises Jessica to think and base her relationship and thoughts
as a mother. Aunt Maria views the fetus as a person, and her two theories are based on the right
to life. Therefore if the fetus is classified as a human being and afforded the personhood status,
aborting it will be considered as murder, which is punishable by God (Hughes, G, 1982).