Regulating Book-keeping Analysis of Intangible Assets in Technology Enterprises Ltd

This project aims to regulate the book-keeping analysis of intangible assets and expenditures in Technology Enterprises Ltd. It explains AASB 138/IAS 38, reduction in financial statement comparability, and understanding of AASB 138/IAS 38.

Running head: FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Financial Accounting
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author’s Note:
Course ID:

1FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Executive Summary:
This project is made with the aim to regulate the precise book-keeping analysis of "intangible
assets" and expenditures incorporated with the same in "Technology Enterprises Limited".
The study takes into consideration the explanation of "AASB 138/IAS 38" incorporated with
the "intangible assets". Next, this study focuses on the reduction in the comparisons of the
"operating statements" due to the limitations and rules provided in "AASB 138/IAS 38".
Lastly, the project emphasizes upon comprehending the grades of "AASB 138/IAS 38".

2FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Table of Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................3
a. Accounting for the project in the operating statement of Technology Enterprises Limited:. 3
b. Reduction in comparability of the financial statements by AASB 138/IAS 38:....................5
c. Understanding of AASB 138/IAS 38:....................................................................................5
Conclusion and recommendations:............................................................................................6
References:.................................................................................................................................7

3FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Introduction:
Every company despite of their character and magnitude are responsible to comply
with various book-keeping schemes and propositions in order to fulfill the "book-keeping"
analysis of the "assets and liabilities", among which "intangible assets", are considered to be
crucial business "assets". The study takes into consideration the explaining of "AASB
138/IAS 38" involved with "intangible assets". These have to comply to the precise "book-
keeping" propositions and grades regarding the "book-keeping" analysis of "intangible
assets" and more precisely, they require to report for their "research and development"
"(R&D)" costs in order to create "intangible assets" (Balakrishnan, Watts and Zuo, 2016). In
Australia, the companies enlisted in "ASX" have to comply to the grades instructions
provided in "AASB 138 Intangible Assets" with respect to "book-keeping" analysis of
"intangible assets" alongside the "research and development" expenditures incorporated with
them.
Depending upon the provided data of "Technology Enterprises Ltd", the book keeper
of the company is facing a notable unpredictability while handling the "projects". The study
aims at giving an outline of the precise "book-keeping" analysis of the "project" tackled by
the concerned company. After this, it focuses on the reduction in the comparisons of the
"profit and loss statements" due to the limitations and rules provided in "AASB 138/IAS 38".
Lastly, the paper emphasizes on comprehending the grades of "AASB 138/IAS 38".
a. Ways through which the project could be accounted for in the financial statements:
It is possible to use the current value process for predicting the actual worth of the
"project". It is owing to the reason that it would help in determining the current "project"
worth and anticipated to be gained by "Technology Enterprises Ltd". Conforming to "fair
value accounting", the plan has "value-in-use" of "$4,000,000" and by utilising the "present
value method", the "fair value" of the plan is evaluated to be "$3,000,000". It creates the
contrast between "fair value" and "value in use" of the plan apparently, that could be shown
in the following way:
"$1,000,000 = $4,000,000 - $3,000,000"
In conformity to the above calculation, a contrast of "$1,000,000" could be noticed between
the cost of "market capitalisation" and "reported price" and it requires to be taken into
consideration by the administration of "Technology Enterprises Ltd".
AASB 138/IAS 38:
In conformity to the explanation provided in "AASB 138/IAS 38", "intangible assets"
are treated in the "form" of "non-monetary" and "intangible assets" of the companies, that
could be sensed palpably. While there is no clear presence, it is considered to be the notable
feature of "intangible assets" along with the characteristics of "non-monetary" worth. Due to
this factor, "AASB 138/IAS 38" composes of the explanation of both "monetary assets" and
"non-monetary assets". A company has "two" options incorporated with "intangible assets",
that involve either "internal generation" or "acquisition" of the same (Aasb.gov.au, 2019).
Intangible asset identification:
As stated in "AASB 138, Para 21", the companies are responsible to perceive
"intangible assets" in the existence of possibility that the company would gain anticipated

4FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
future advantages regarding the "assets", when it is possible to gauge the "asset" prices with
dependability. Due to this factor, the company is required to ensure that the barring of
expenditures and prices sustained in terms of advantage for the company after the "research"
prices sustained have been deducted (Callen, 2015). For "Technology Enterprises Ltd", it is
evident that the company has sustained different prices, which are depicted below:
From the above chart, it could be noticed that "Technology Enterprises Ltd" has spent
"$1,000,000" for various reasons in order to create the plan. Hence, it is important for the
company in order to perceive the sum in terms of expenditures.
Gauging intangible assets:
According to "AASB 138, Para 24", a company is required to ensure that "intangible
asset" is measured at price and "Technology Enterprises Ltd" is not an anomaly to this
condition as well. Hence, it is required to judge its plan at price in the beginning phase, that is
"$4,000,000". The expenditures which "Technology Enterprises Ltd" sustained plan creation
requires to be taken into consideration in terms of "R&D" prices and "AASB 138" imposes
responsibility on the company to identify its "R&D" prices as "sunk cost" in the unified
earnings report. It is significant to indicate that "Technology Enterprises Ltd" could produce
"intangible assets" privately within the company for a particular period. While an "intangible
assets" is gained from business amalgamations, the companies require presenting the surplus
of buying in terms of "goodwill" (Gassen, et al., 2017).
Research cost:
"AASB 138, Para 8" requires a company to accomplish well explained and strategized
investigation so that it would be capable to gain proper mathematical and mechanical insight
on "research" price. For "Technology Enterprises Ltd", the expense which the company has
sustained is to increase the longevity of the batteries in order to produce monetary flows for
"four years" by completely obeying to the instructions provided in "AASB 138". Thus, the
"research" price i.e., the sum of "$100,000" has to be taken into consideration in terms of
expenditures under the "sunk cost category" (De Waegenaere, Sansing and Wielhouwer,
2015).
Asset development:

5FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
As per "AASB 138", an "asset" is created by a company after there is the fulfilment of
the "research project". The company has to perceive the "asset" after its mechanical detect-
ability is approved giving the company an option to use alongside selling the "asset" (Dutta
and Patatoukas, 2016). In order to recognise the worth of the "asset" in the "balance sheet
statement", it is important to recognise precisely the "book-keeping" grades and it is
considered to be a crucial factor after the suitability test. "Technology Enterprises Ltd" has
sustained significant "research" expenditure for plan creation. After the suitability test, it has
been observed that the "project" would bring a worth of "$4,000,000" to the company.
b. Decline in financial statement comparability owing to the use of AASB 138/IAS 38:
"Comparability" is a vital aspect of the "operating statements" with the utilisation of
which the "users" could contrast between the "financial" data of the companies (Howieson, et
al., 2015). This particular aspect is presented from the "book-keeping" grades and schemes
embraced by the companies. In conformity with "AASB 138", the companies obtain the
alternatives of producing "intangible assets" privately or they could gain the same from
business amalgamations. The above exploration makes it essential as well that the "intangible
assets" are categorised as "non-monetary assets" due to the non-existence of real material.
These factors are the outcome of differing identification of the "assets" from company to
company depending upon the anticipated advantages they obtain, as they require to perceive
advantages gained from the "intangible assets" (Trenholm, et al., 2016). Furthermore, the
companies are required to take into account the classification and identification of the
relevant expenditures spent on those "assets".
As cited in "AASB 138", the companies are responsible to perceive the profit
regarding the "intangible assets" in an identical manner at the same time the "intangible
assets" gain is made as part of various "assets". Under this situation, it is important to follow
the "book-keeping" instructions provided in "AASB 138" for "asset" identification the
expense sustained regarding the "R&D" has to be realised. The comparison characteristic has
to be existing in the "operating statements" of the concerned company. While this
characteristic is existing, it gives a chance to the "profit and loss statements" in differing data
for financial factors like- "assets and liabilities" with other company or varying period of the
same business (Macve, 2015). In the form of comparisons, it is to be kept in mind that the
diversifications among estimation, identification and analysis from company to company
could affect the comparison aspects of financial data. It is majorly because of the reason that
there is no constant process regarding the analysis, estimation and identification of
"intangible assets" (Maynard, 2017).
Correspondingly, the "users" of the "operating statements" are restricted to comparing
worth or systems of analysis or systems of identification of "intangible assets" of "one"
company with similar data of another company. Therefore, the effect is direct on the
"decision-making" method of the "profit and loss statement" "users". It depicts that "AASB
138" diminishes the comparisons of the "operating statements" to a particular level
(Mullinova, 2016).
c. Understanding of AASB 138/IAS 38:
"AASB 138" is considered to be noteworthy for the Australian companies, as it
behaves as a crucial paper and guidelines to carry out the "book-keeping" analysis regarding
the "intangible assets". The companies could gain the needed "book-keeping" schemes and

6FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
from the above mentioned grades relating to "intangible assets" (Narayanaswamy, 2017). As
per the instructions provided in "AASB 138", "intangible assets" are considered to be the
"assets", which could be recognised in the absenteeism of any real material. Furthermore, the
"AASB 138" instructions depicts that companies are required to ensure the "intangible assets"
gain in a way via which it would be feasible to trade or sell those in the "market" (Pratt,
2016). However, the paper of the grade consists of the explanation financial "assets" as well
as "non-monetary assets". Alongside these, "AASB 138" gives options to the businesses,
through which either they would produce "intangible assets" normally or the identical one
might be gained from business amalgamations that would bring about "goodwill"
identification in terms of surplus of buying deliberation (Stockenstrand and Nilsson, 2017).
"AASB 138" requires the businesses to ensure the analysis of "intangible assets" at
price in the beginning phases and the privately produced "intangible assets" have to be
notified at "cost value" as well. While the "intangible assets" are identified, the companies
need assuring the existence of an opportunity, which the future "economic" advantages
included in those "assets" would be rushed against them and those "assets" price could be
analysed with authenticity (Tong and Saladrigues, 2018). However, the grades depict that the
companies require to perceive expenses sustained in order to produce "intangible assets" in
terms of "research and development", which are required to be revealed in the unified "profit
and loss statement" in terms of "sunk costs". The feasibility of those "assets" has to be
gauged by the companies while those "assets" would be "reported" in the combined
statements of financial status of the businesses (Trotman and Carson, 2018).
Conclusion and recommendations:
Depending on the above conversation, it could be observed that "Technology
Enterprises Ltd" requires to utilise the current worth process in order to evaluate the worth of
the "research and development project". In order to carry out the "book-keeping" analysis for
this "project", the business has to comply with the instructions and grades provided in the
"AASB 138". It has been assessed that "intangible assets" take into account "monetary" as
well as "non-monetary assets". It is the responsibility of the companies to ensure that the
worth of "assets and liabilities" are revealed timely in the "operating statement" when
obeying the important "book-keeping" propositions and instructions. In case of "Technology
Enterprises Ltd", the problem of the stockholders could be diminished, if the administration
of the company gives specific crucial declarations regarding the financial attributes like-
"intangible assets". The organisations are considered to be liable to "report" the worth of
"assets" periodically and aptly.
The administration of "Technology Enterprises Ltd" is recommended to carry out
appraisal and evaluation of the "intangible assets" after assessing financial suitability of these
"assets". For assuring the aforesaid, it is important for the administration of the concerned
business to follow the schemes and rules in order to ensure revelation and complying
incorporated with the financial "assets". These revelations regarding the financial factors of
the company play a significant part in the evaluation of the financial data alongside the
definitions of the "assets and liabilities" of the business. "Technology Enterprises Ltd" is not
excluded from these conditions as well and they have to obey the aforementioned instructions
for assuring the rush of "economic" advantages towards the company.

7FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
References:
Aasb.gov.au., 2019. Available at:
https://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/AASB138_08-15_COMPoct15_01-18.pdf
[Accessed 13 May 2019].
Balakrishnan, K., Watts, R. and Zuo, L., 2016. The effect of accounting conservatism on
corporate investment during the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Finance &
Accounting, 43(5-6), pp.513-542.
Callen, J.L., 2015. A selective critical review of financial accounting research. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, 26, pp.157-167.
Cascino, S., Clatworthy, M., Garcia Osma, B., Gassen, J. and Imam, S., 2017. The
Usefulness of Financial Accounting Information: Evidence from the Field.
De Waegenaere, A., Sansing, R. and Wielhouwer, J.L., 2015. Financial accounting effects of
tax aggressiveness: Contracting and measurement. Contemporary Accounting
Research, 32(1), pp.223-242.
Dutta, S. and Patatoukas, P.N., 2016. Identifying conditional conservatism in financial
accounting data: theory and evidence. The Accounting Review, 92(4), pp.191-216.
Henderson, S., Peirson, G., Herbohn, K. and Howieson, B., 2015. Issues in financial
accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Kimmel, P.D., Weygandt, J.J., Kieso, D.E. and Trenholm, B., 2016. Financial Accounting.
Wiley Custom Learning Solutions.
Macve, R., 2015. A Conceptual Framework for Financial Accounting and Reporting: Vision,
Tool, Or Threat?. Routledge.
Maynard, J., 2017. Financial accounting, reporting, and analysis. Oxford University Press.
Mullinova, S., 2016. Use of the principles of IFRS (IAS) 39" Financial instruments:
recognition and assessment" for bank financial accounting. Modern European Researches,
(1), pp.60-64.
Narayanaswamy, R., 2017. Financial accounting: a managerial perspective. PHI Learning
Pvt. Ltd..
Pratt, J., 2016. Financial accounting in an economic context. John Wiley & Sons.
Stockenstrand, A.K. and Nilsson, F. eds., 2017. Bank Regulation: Effects on Strategy,
Financial Accounting and Management Control. Taylor & Francis.
Tong, Y. and Saladrigues, R., 2018. The predictability of financial, accounting-based, and
industrial factors on the success of newly incorporated Spanish firms. Intangible
Capital, 14(1), pp.127-145.
Trotman, K. and Carson, E., 2018. Financial accounting: an integrated approach. Cengage
AU.