INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 TASK...............................................................................................................................................3 Evaluation of the financial performance and financial position of Farsons and Heiniken:.. .4 Evaluation of the Working Capital:...................................................................................9 Assessment of the Cash Flow:..............................................................................................10 Overall assessment:..............................................................................................................11 CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................11 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................12 APPENDIX....................................................................................................................................13
INTRODUCTION Financial analyses are the tool which is used by the organization in order to evaluate the financial information as well s performance of the company in the accounting period. It is recommended to measure the performance of the company in terms of liquidity, profitability or efficiecncy of the company. It is used to measured the enterprise is effectively operating, solvent, havingfavourableliquidityposition,orcompetitivetojustifyanyinvestmentincapital (Williams and Dobelman, 2017). This project report cover various evaluations such as vertical, horizontal or ratio analysis which helps in measuring financial performance of Farsons and Heiniken. Both organizations are beer, wine or soft drink manufacturing companies. This report includes the comparative analysis of working capital and cash flows of respective companies. TASK Overview of Companies: Farsons:It is Malta based company which manufacture the beer and beverages item. Company is engaged in production, brewing, sales and distribution of premium quality beers and other beverages. Company directly supply their products as wholesale as well as retailers. Company offer wide range of beer which attracts the customers or make their brand leading company of the industry. There are some most popular beers or products of the company such as are Blue Label Ale, Kinnie range of soft drinks, Hopleaf Pale Ale, San Michel table water, Cisk Lager etc.Farsonsis the first non-commercial banking company which listed on Malta Stock Exchange and its share traded as SFC in the market. Heiniken:It is the most popular manufacture of seller of beer which offer quality products. It is Dutch company which approx. manufacture over 300 global, local and speciality cidersandbeers.Companygloballydiversifywhichhaveskilledpersontoperformits operational activities in well manner, approximately over 85000 operate breweries, workers and employees. Company is currently operated in over 70 countries and capture the major share of the overall beverage industry.Heinikenintroduce variety of products that’s why it is called innovated Company of their sector. Main agenda of this business is to create value for consumers which are the biggest strength and then success criteria.
Evaluation of the financial performance and financial position of Farsons and Heiniken: Verticalanalysis:Inthisanalysis,eachitemproportionwillbeevaluatedwhich mentioned in the financial statement of the company. Each and every item described in a (%) proportion form. Evaluation based on increase or decrease in the proportion of each item of Income Statement such as gross profit, overall sales, revenue etc. Balance sheet item also evaluated in proportion form and it includes the value of assets as well as liability. Vertical analysis of selected companies is mentioned below and it is based on the financial statements: Heiniken: Income Statement: With the help of vertical analysis of income statement of Heiniken Plc it has been evacuate that gross profits of the company in proportion declined in 2018 to 51.29% but it will be reported after continuous improvement from the period of 2015 to 2017. Along with this, further analysis based on net profit of the company was like 4.67% in 2015 which is increases in comparisons to 2016 and it was 3.75%. Further this proportion reached at 4.46% and 4.28% in 2017 and 2018 respectively (Annual Report of Heiniken. 2019). Statement of financial position: Further analysis based on the Balance sheet item which represent that non current assets of the company are 84.32%, 79.31%, 79.90% and 78.38% of total assets for the period of 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 respectively. It shows the decline in the value of non current assets for the respective years. Other than this, cash value proportion of the company in comparisons to total assets of the company. It was increased in 2018 to 6.92%, 2.23% in 2015, 7.72% in 2016 and 5.95% in 2017.In addition it include the analysis of current assets which are 15.68%, 20.69%, 20.10% and 21.62% of total assets of company for the period of 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 respectively. Shareholder's funds of the company evaluated as 17.06% of total assets in 2018 and in the previous years it was 17.90%, 16.78% and 16.16% for the duration of 2015, 2016 and 2017 respectively. Current liabilities of the company reduce from 26.44% to 24.91% in the period of 2016 to 2018. Along with this, vertical analysis evaluates the non-current liabilities which were decreases from 59.52% to 58.03% for the duration of 2015 to 2018. Farsons: Income Statement:
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Accoerding to vertical analysis of Farsons's income statement it has been assessed that gross profit in proportion to aggregate sales was 37.97% in 2015 and it further increased 38.82% in 2016. In 2017 or 2018, it has been evaluated to 38.64% and 38.95% which was good and this information further beneficial for management to make strategic. On the other side, Net income of the company in relation to total sales was 14.74%, 10.13%, 12.94% and 13.64% in the duration of 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2017 respectively. This evaluated shows that, capacity of generating net income has been increased. Statement of Financial Position: Vertical analysis of balance sheet of Farsons Company which represent the shareholder's equity in the period of 2015 it was 67.11% of total assets. It further change and remain 66.87%, 67.21% and 59.88% for the period of 2016, 2017 and 2018 respectively. On the other side, value of liabilities also evaluated and it was 20.37% in 2018, 32.79%, 32.52% and 32.89% in the period of 2015, 2016 and 2017 respectively (Annual Report of Farsons. 2019). Non-current assets of the company reduces in the period of 2018 was 77.16% in relation to total value of assets. It was reduces in the previous period and it was 81.42%, 79.14%, 78.52% for the period of 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively. On the other side, with the help of vertical, current assets proportioned increased from 18.58% to 22.22% in the duration of 2015 to 2018. Horizontal Analysis: This analysis required previous information of the company in order to evaluate or monitor the financials information. It helps in trends analyses which help the organization to understand the previous performance of the company and it further beneficial in formulating strategies for the evaluation of performance of the company. It helps in measuring gap which is veryimportanttofulfill.Organizationfacetheissuesregardingchangeinthefinancial statement’s over the period. This analysis evaluates the sales, expenditures, assets or obligations of the company and also measure that how it will impact the overall performance of the company. Heiniken: Income Statement: In context of Heiniken company, Horizontal analysis based on income statement which evaluated that, increase in the value of sales during the period of 2017 was maximum in comparison to 2018 which was 5.27% and 2.66% respectively. Gross profit of the company
reduces 2018 by 2.08% while in 2017 it was reported as maximum value which was 6.04%. In addition, further evaluation based on net profits of the company which also reduces by 1.64% in 2018 as compare to 2017. In 2017, net profit of the company increased by 25.42% after a decrease of 18.60% in year 2016. Declines in net profit represent the opposing profitability conditions. Statement of financial position: Horizontal analysis of Heiniken represents that shareholder’s funds of the company increases to 7.91% in 2018. It was change in the percentage form and in 2016 or 2017 it was - 2.25% and 0.53% respectively. Non -current liabilities of the company increased by 1.69% in 2018 which was previously increased by 7.24% in 2017. Current liabilities of the company decreased by -0.08% in 2018 which was further increased by 22.09% and 0.59% in the duration of 2016 and 2017. Cash funds of the Heiniken Company increased by 268.33% in 2016 which also decreased by 19.54% in 2018. But there was an increase of 18.88% which was reported and evaluated with the help of horizontal analysis. Company’s Current assets increased by 37.59%, 1.36% and 9.97% in year 2016, 2017 and 2018 respectively. In addition, Non-current assets were increased by 0.31% in 2018, 5.14% in 2017 and reduce 1.94% in 2016. Farsons: Income Statement: Woth the help of horizontal analysis, Farsons company evaluate the overall performance and revenue of the company in 2018 reported as 7.95% which was increased in comparison to previous years that is 3.53% in 2017. Gross profit of the company increased by 8.82% in 2018 and in 2016 and 2017 it was reported as 10% and 3.03% respectively. In addition, net profit of the company increases in 2018 to 16.67% in comparison to 2016 and 2017 around 37.50% & 9.09% respectively. Statement of financial Position: According to annual reports figures of Farsons Company, with the help of horizontal analysis it has been evaluated that shareholder's funds decreases by 21.14% in 2018. On the other side, in 2016 & 2017 it was increases and remains 9% and 12.84% respectively. Non -current liabilities of the company increased by 11.67% in 2018, 13.21% in 2017 and 8.16% in 2016. In addition, current liabilities of Farsons company increased by 33.33% in 2018. In 2017, there was
nothing change in the figures and total assets value reduced by 11.48% in 2018 but it was increased in 2017 and 2016 from 12.27% and 9.40% respectively. Non- current assets of the company reduces by 16.11% which was previously increased by 15.50% in 2017 and 10.26% in year 2016. Ratio Analysis: It is refer to the systematic approach which used in evaluating organisational performance in terms of profitability, liquidity, efficiency etc. This analysis based on the financial information of the years. Evaluation will be done by top managements or analyst in order to analyse the various aspect which is beneficial for making future strategies. Ration analysis of the selected companies are mentioned below: Net Profit Ratio: This ratio used to evaluate the profitability of the company where net profit of the company divided with total sales. It help the management to get the idea that how much profitable their organization or they are able to meet their objectives of not. Further decisions of the management will be based on this overall profitability of the company. Below mention calculation based on both selected companies: Net Profit Ratio = Net profit after tax / Net sales X 100 FarsonsHeiniken 20152016201720182015201620172018 Net Margin10.11%13.22%13.77%14.49%4.67%3.75%4.46%4.28% From the above mentioned table it has been evaluated that Farsons organization's net profit are more impressive then the Heiniken. Because it has net profit from the period of 2015 to 2018 was 10.11% to 14.49%. On the other side, net profit ratio of the Heiniken company fluctuated such as 4.67%, 3.75%, 4.46% and 4.28% from the duration of 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. Observation showsthat net profit of the Heiniken hasdeclinewhich reducesthe productivity of the company or does not able to meet their goals & objectives. Gross Profit Ratio:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Thisratioindicatestheoperationalefficiencyofthecompanywhichhelpthe managements to evaluate operational performance. It is calculated through dividing gross profit of the company from total revenue generated through sales. Deducting all the direct expenses from the total sales in order identify the core operational value. Below mention calculation based on selected companies: FarsonsHeiniken 20152016201720182015201620172018 Gross Margin37.97%38.82%38.64%38.95%52.7553.3953.7751.29 With the help of ratio analysis, it has been evaluated that gross profit ratio of the Farsons Company was 37.97% in 2015, 38.82% in 2016, 38.64% in 2017 and 38.95% in 2018. There was continues improvement in the Gross profit with very minimum rate. On the other side, gross profit of Heiniken has been reduces and remain 52.75% in 2015, 53.39% in 2016, 53.77% in 2017 to 51.29% in year 2018. Heiniken is more profitable in comparison to Farsons company and further managements will take appropriate decisions in order to meet their obligations. Current Ratio: It is the liquidity ratio which helps the organization to identify their position in terms of liquidity and how they are able to meet their obligations in short period. This ratio will be calculated with the help of dividing current assets from current liability. Ideal ratios are 2:1 which shows that company is able to pay off their obligations. Below mention calculation based on both selected companies: Formula: Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current liability FarsonsHeiniken 20152016201720182015201620172018 Current Ratio1.721.391.391.120.690.780.790.87 From the above calculation it has been analysed that, Farsons company are more capable to meet their short term obligations because current ratio of the company was 1.72 to 1.12 from
the period of 2015 to 2018. Current ratio of Heiniken company which was 0.69 to 0.87 for the period of 2015 to 2018. It was low in comparison to Farsons. It means Farson is more capable to pay off their debt ort meet their operational requirements Return of Equity (RoE): It is the financial ratio which is used by the finance department in order to evaluate their efficiency regarding return on equity. High the return is beneficial for the company which attract more investors. This ratio estimation the effectiveness of the company on comparative basis such as net resources or resources less liabilities. Below mention calculation based on selected organizations: FarsonsHeiniken 20152016201720182015201620172018 Return on Equity12.52%10.43%10.70%8.19%14.87%11.67%14.77%13.94% With the help of ratio analysis, Farsons company able to evaluate the ROE which was reduces from 10.70% in 2017, 8.19% in 2018. In 2015 and 2016, ROE was 12.52% and 10.43% which continues reduces. In context of Heiniken, company has diminishing return where 14.77% in 2017 to 13.94% in 2018. Along with this, ROE of Heiniken was 14.87% and 11.67% in 2015 and 2016. Based on evaluation, Heiniken is more beneficial because it provide higher return in comparison to Farsons. Evaluation of the Working Capital: Working capital is the aggregate difference of current assets or current liability which is used to evaluate that how business operate their operational activities. In order to perform their daily activities they required enough working capital to functioning well. Current assets include thecash balance, accounts receivable different inventories balance and other short term liquid investment. On the other side, current liability include balance of accounts payable and other short-termobligation.Belowmentionworkingcapitalevaluationbasedontheselected companies: FarsonsHeiniken (EURin20152016201720182015201620172018
Million) Current Assets323334365914813782489070 Current Liabilties182424328516103971045810450 Working Capital149104-2602-2260-2210-1380 Heiniken:Current assets of the company were 5914, 8137, 8248 and 9070 million in the duration of 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 respectively. On the other side, current liability was 8516, 10397, 10458 and 10450 million for the same period. In result, it evaluates the working capital that is -2603, - 2260, - 2210 and – 1380 for the period of 2015 to 2018. Working capital of the company was in negative terms which indicated that, they are unable to meet as well as perform their operational activities. Farsons:Current assets of the company from the duration of 2015 to 2018 were 32, 33, 34 and 36 respectively. On the other side, current liabilities for the same period were 18, 24, 24 and 32. Working capital of the company for the same duration are 14, 9, 10 and 4 million. This organization has positive working capital which is beneficial for the business and it will make them able to perform their operational activities in well manner. From the above evaluation, it has been concluded that Farsons is more productive in composition to Heiniken because it has positive working capital which make them able to perform their operational activities. Assessment of the Cash Flow: Cash flow of the company represents the overall flow of cash in the organization from various activities such as operational. With the help of cash flow statement, organization able to evaluate the overall spending of money. It is also important to analyse the cash flow because it further helps the management to make their decisions accordingly. Heiniken: Net Cash inflow from operating activity of Heiniken company was reported 3489 million, 3718 million, 3882 million and 4388 million for the duration of 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 respectively. Total flow of cash from investing activity was 2064 million, 2,007 million, 2965
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
million and 2355 million for the period of 2015 to 2018. Along with this, cash from financing activity was 1,173 million, 672 million, 966 million and 967 million for 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 respectively. Free cash flow of the company was 1,759 million, 1,852 million, 2,049 million and 2,333 for the period of 2015 to 2018. Company has positive net income which is in favour of meeting all the organizational obligations. Farsons:Net cash flow from operating activity reported as 16, 16, 13 and 21 million for the duration of 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 respect. Along with this, cash outflow from investing activity was 7, 18, 20 and 21 million from the period of 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 separately. Cash flow from financing reported as -4, - 2, 4 and - 1 million in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. Organization's free incomes are 9 million, - 1 million, - 6 million and 7 million during same period. Company increased their income statement in 2016. With the help of above discussion profitability of Heiniken company increases from past 4 years organization's incomes are sure while free cash flow of Farsons having negative figure in the duration of 2016 and 2017. Overall assessment: From the above evaluation it has be evaluating that Heiniken Company provide more returns in comparisons to Farsons. Gross profit of Heiniken also more attractive but the working capital position of the company was not so good but they have positive balance of income. On the other side, net profit of the Farsons company increase and working capital balance is positive. With the help of vertical or horizontal analysis, management evaluate the proportion of Heininken with Faesons. CONCLUSION From the above report it has been concluded that financial analysis which is used by the organization in order to evaluate business operation and the activities which helps in evaluating performance and sustainability. There are various ways to analysis the financial performance of the company such as vertical, horizontal as well as ratio analyses. It is totally based in the incomes statements and balance sheet of the company. It further helps in determining liquidity, efficiency, and profitability of the company. It provide the different perspectives which impact the decision makinf process of the company. `
REFERENCES Books and Journals: Blum, P. and Dacorogna, M., 2014. DFA‐Dynamic Financial Analysis.Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. Bragg, S. M., 2012.Financial Analysis.: A Controller's Guide. John Wiley & Sons. Cucchiella, F., D’Adamo, I. and Gastaldi, M., 2015. Financial analysis for investment and policy decisionsinthe renewableenergysector.Clean Technologiesand Environmental Policy.17(4). pp.887-904. El Kasmioui, O. and Ceulemans, R., 2012. Financial analysis of the cultivation of poplar and willow for bioenergy.Biomass and bioenergy.43. pp.52-64. García, J. G., Martínez-Cutillas, A. and Romero, P., 2012. Financial analysis of wine grape productionusingregulateddeficitirrigationandpartial-rootzonedrying strategies.Irrigation Science.30(3). pp.179-188. Isberg, S. and Pitta, D., 2013. Using financial analysis to assess brand equity.Journal of Product & Brand Management.22(1). pp.65-78. Palepu, K. G. and Healy, P. M., 2013. Business analysis and valuation: Using financial statements, text and cases. Post, C. and Byron, K., 2015. Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta- analysis.Academy of Management Journal.58(5), pp.1546-1571. Sheikhi, A., Ranjbar, A. M. and Oraee, H., 2012. Financial analysis and optimal size and operation for a multicarrier energy system.Energy and buildings.48. pp.71-78. Vogel,H.L.,2014.Entertainmentindustryeconomics:Aguideforfinancialanalysis. Cambridge University Press. Williams, E. E. and Dobelman, J. A., 2017. Financial statement analysis.World Scientific Book Chapters, pp.109-169. Online: AnnualReportofFarsons,2019.[Online].Availablethrough: <https://www.farsons.com/en/financial-statements-archive> AnnualReportofHeiniken,2019.[Online].Availablethrough: <https://www.theheinekencompany.com/Age-gate.aspx?returnurl=%2f>
APPENDIX HEINEKEN INCOME STATEMENT
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.