Financial Management and Control: Performance Evaluation and Investment Appraisal Techniques

The report explains about various financial analysis concepts. Financial analysis is a process which is done by the companies and its stakeholders to identify and evaluate various financial concept of an organization such as evaluation on financial statements, evaluation on the various investment proposals etc. in the given report, performance of Zurich plc has been evaluated on the basis of ratio analysis. And the investment opportunity of Johnson limited has been evaluated on the basis of various capital budgeting techniques and the recommendation has been given to the company that the company should invest into the project or not.

RUNNUNG HEAD: Financial management and control 1
Project Report: Financial management and control

Financial management and control 2
Contents
Introduction:..........................................................................................................................................4
Part A.....................................................................................................................................................4
A report on the performance of Zurich Plc Ltd......................................................................................4
Ratios:....................................................................................................................................................4
Profitability ratios:.............................................................................................................................4
Limitations:........................................................................................................................................5
Liquidity ratios:..................................................................................................................................6
Limitations.........................................................................................................................................6
Gearing Ratios:..................................................................................................................................6
Limitations.........................................................................................................................................7
Asset Utilization ratio:.......................................................................................................................7
Limitations.........................................................................................................................................8
Investment ratio:...............................................................................................................................8
Limitations.........................................................................................................................................8
Task 2:.................................................................................................................................................10
Que a...............................................................................................................................................10
Investment appraisal techniques.....................................................................................................10
Calculation of payback period.....................................................................................................10
Calculation of discounted payback period...................................................................................10
The accounting rate of return......................................................................................................11
The net present value..................................................................................................................12
The initial rate of return..............................................................................................................13
Que b)..............................................................................................................................................14
The Payback Period:........................................................................................................................14
Key Benefits.................................................................................................................................14
Limitations...................................................................................................................................14
The discounted Payback Period.......................................................................................................14
Key Benefits.................................................................................................................................14
Limitations...................................................................................................................................15
The Accounting Rate of Return........................................................................................................15
Key Benefits.................................................................................................................................15

Financial management and control 3
Limitations...................................................................................................................................15
The Net Present Value.....................................................................................................................15
Key Benefits.................................................................................................................................16
Limitations...................................................................................................................................16
The Internal Rate of Return.............................................................................................................16
Key Benefits.................................................................................................................................16
Limitations...................................................................................................................................16
Que c)..............................................................................................................................................16
Internal and external sources of the company................................................................................16
References:..........................................................................................................................................18
Appendix.............................................................................................................................................20

Financial management and control 4
Introduction:
The report explains about various financial analysis concepts. Financial analysis is a
process which is done by the companies and its stakeholders to identify and evaluate various
financial concept of an organization such as evaluation on financial statements, evaluation on
the various investment proposals etc. in the given report, performance of Zurich plc has been
evaluated on the basis of ratio analysis. And the investment opportunity of Johnson limited
has been evaluated on the basis of various capital budgeting techniques and the
recommendation has been given to the company that the company should invest into the
project or not.
Part A:
A report on the performance of Zurich Plc Ltd:
The performance of position of Zurich Plc has been evaluated through identifying the
financial performance and strength of the company. For evaluating the financial performance
and the position of Zurich plc, ratio analysis study has been conducted. The financial
statement of Zurich plc of 2015 and 2016 has been evaluated and it has been analyzed that
how much changes have taken place into the financial performance of the company from last
year and how is the current position of the company. Various ratios have been calculated to
identify the position of the company. Following is the calculations and analysis:
Ratios:
Ratio analysis is a quantitative analysis which contains and evaluates information
related to the financial statement of an organization. It is used to analyze the company’s
operating and financial knowledge such as profitability level, solvency level, efficiency level
and liquidity level (Shapiro, 2005). Following is the study of ratio analysis on Zurich plc:
Profitability ratios:
Profitability ratios are a part of ratio analysis which expresses about the total ability of an
organization to generate and enhance the revenue in context with the various expenses such
as selling expenses, operating expenses; cost of goods sold etc. following is the calculations
of profitability ratio:
1. Gross profit margin – Gross profit/revenue x 100

Financial management and control 5
2. Return on shareholder’s equity – Retained earnings/shareholder’s equity x100
3. Net profit margin – Retained earnings/revenue x 100
4. Return on assets – Retained earnings/total assets x 100
5. Return on capital employed – Retained earnings/capital employed x 100
(Horngren et al, 2005)
Profitability ratio analysis
(amount in £ '000)
Profitability Ratios 2016 2015
Return on shareholder
fund 0.048956 0.028693
ROCE 0.094829 0.071527
Gross profit ratio 0.390169 0.358616
Gross Profit 7382 5825
net profit ratio 0.051419 0.035103
Profitability ratio of Zurich plc depicts about the profit generation capability of the
company. The calculations express that the position of the company has been better from last
year in context with the profitability ratio. The gross profit level and gross profit ratio of the
company expresses that the profitability level of the company has been enhanced. Net profit
ratio of the company has also been enhanced from last year and due to which the profit
generation capability of the company has been better. Lastly, the ROCE and return on
shareholder fund has been calculated and it has been found that the investment opportunity in
the company is quite better.
Limitations:
Profitability ratio of an organization could be affected due to many internal and
external issues. Earnings and investments are the main sources due to which the profitability
ratio of the organization could be affected. Numerous ways are there to impact on the
profitability position of an organization and thus it is difficult to evaluate the exact
profitability position of the company. This study evaluates the profitability position of an
organization for short period only. Future prediction could not be done on the basis of
profitability ratio (Kurov and Stan, 2016). Various non controllable factors affect he position.
It extremely implicate over the capital structure and position of the company. So, on the basis
of profitability ratios, exact financial performance of the company could not be evaluated.

Financial management and control 6
Liquidity ratios:
Liquidity ratios are a part of ratio analysis which expresses about the total ability of
an organization to pay the short term debt obligation. Following is the calculations of
liquidity ratio:
1. Current ratio – Current Assets/Current Liabilities
2. Quick ratio – (Current Assets-Inventory)/Current liabilities
(Kiran & Singh, 2014)
Liquidity ratio
(amount in £ '000)
2016 2015
Current ratio £ 1.38 £ 2.91
Quick ratio £ 1.06 £ 2.36
Liquidity ratio of Zurich plc depicts about the capability of the company to pay all the
short term debts on the basis of short term assets. The calculations express that the position of
the company has been better from last year in context with the liquidity ratio. The current
ratio of the company expresses that the liquidity level of the company has been lower though
the cost has been reduced as well as maximum utilization of minimum resources is done. On
the other hand, quick ratio of the company expresses that the company is utilizing the
resources at their best. The risk level and the cost level of the company is minimum
Limitations:
Liquidity ratio of an organization could be affected due to many internal and external
issues. This study evaluates the liquidity position of an organization is good for short period
only. Future prediction could not be done on the basis of liquidity ratio. Numerous non
controllable factors, sudden debt and assets make an impact on the liquidity position. It
extremely implicate over the working capital and the resources of the company (Jaumotte,
Lall and Papageorgiou, 2013). So, on the basis of liquidity ratios, exact financial performance
of the company could not be evaluated.
Gearing Ratios:
Gearing ratios are a part of ratio analysis which expresses about the total ability of an
organization to manage its risk, return and cost. Following is the calculations of gearing ratio:

Financial management and control 7
1. Debt to equity ratio – total debt/total equity
2. Times interest earned – EBIT/interest
3. Equity ratio – Equity/total assets
4. Debt ratio – Total debt/ total assets
(Bandy, 2013)
Gearing ratio analysis
2016 2015
(amount in £ '000)
Gearing ratio/debt equity 1.13521 17.85
Debt Ratio 0.36678 0.03662
Interest cover/ time interest earned 5.3886 6.34904
The gearing ratio of the company expresses about the debt and cost level of the
company. On the basis of calculations, it has been evaluated that the company is managing
the optimal capital structure. The level of debt has been reduced by the company to manage
the risk and cost of the company.
Limitations:
Gearing ratio is based on many assumptions as well as the information manipulates
the financial analyst and the financial manager of the company to make a decision. The risk
and return calculated through these methods are quite traditional approach and it do not take
the concern of all the related factors (Airaudo, Nisticò and Zanna, 2015). So, on the basis of
gearing ratios, exact financial performance of the company could not be evaluated.
Asset Utilization ratio:
Asset utilization ratios are a part of ratio analysis which expresses about the total
assets of an organization and the capabilities of the company to manage the assets. Following
is the calculations of assets utilization:
1. Asset turnover ratio – Sales/average assets
2. Accounts receivables turnover ratio – Sales/average inventory
3. Inventory turnover ratio – Sales/average inventory (Deegan, 2013)
Asset Utilization ratio

Financial management and control 8
2016 2015
(amount in £ '000)
Debtors Turnover 3.81452 3.83995
Total Assets
Turnover 0.59256 0.07722
The calculation of asset utilization of the company expresses that the financial
performance and the asset utilization strategies of the company is quite similar from last year
and it is quite competitive.
Limitations:
The main limitation of this ratio is its dependability. It evaluates both the tangible and
non tangible assets of an organization. And due to it, the expected values of the company get
affected and it manipulates the financial analyst. So, on the basis of assets management
ratios, exact financial performance of the company could not be evaluated
Investment ratio:
Investment ratios are a part of ratio analysis which expresses about the total financial
position and capital structure position of a company. It evaluates the investment level of an
organization. Following is the calculations of assets utilization:
1. Earnings per share – (Net income – dividend to preferred shareholders)/# of
shares outstanding.
2. Dividend yield – dividend per share/ stock price per share
3. Price earnings ratio – Stock price per share/EPS (Brigham and Ehrhardt, 2013)
Investment ratio analysis
2016 2015
(amount in £
'000)
EPS 0.07839 0.04594
dividend payout 0.51396 0.87693
net profit ratio 0.05142 0.0351
Investment ratios of the company express that the current position of the company is
quite better in the market.
Limitations:

Financial management and control 9
Investment ratio takes the concern of irrelevant information and thus it becomes
difficult for the organization and the financial analyst to reach over a better conclusion about
the investment level of the company. So, on the basis of investment ratios, exact financial
performance of the company could not be evaluated

Financial management and control 10
Task 2:
Que a)
Investment appraisal techniques:
Capital investment appraisal techniques are primarily planned by the companies to
evaluate the best investment opportunity for the business. The capital investment program of
the company evaluates the long term as well as short term program. Capital investment
techniques are used to measure the total investment, profit, and payback period etc of an
investment plan. Following is the calculations of investment option of Johnsons limited:
Calculation of payback period:
Payback period is a part of capital investment appraisal technique, it evaluates about the total
time period which would be taken by the investment option to pay the total invested amount.
Following is the calculations of payback period of the company:
Calculation of Payback period
Years
Cash
inflow
Cash
outflow
Cash
flow CF
initial
investment -20,00,000 0
-
20,00,000
1 1220000 350000 870000 -1130000
2 1220000 350000 870000 -260000
3 1220000 350000 870000 610000
4 1220000 350000 870000 1480000
5 1220000 350000 870000 2350000
6 1220000 350000 870000 3220000
Pay Back Period= Initial investment/ cash inflow per
period (Gali, 2015) 2.2988506
The payback period calculations express that the total invested amount would be get
back by the organization in 2.29 years which expresses about a good position of the
investment.
Calculation of discounted payback period:

Financial management and control 11
Discounted payback period is a part of capital investment appraisal technique, it evaluates
about the total time period which would be taken by the investment option to pay the total invested
amount after considering the net present value of the inflows and outflows. Following is the
calculations of discounted payback period of the company:
Calculation of Discounted Payback period
Years Cash Inflow Factors P.V. of cash inflows CF
0 -2000000 -2000000
1 870000 0.909090909 790909.0909 -1209091
2 870000 0.826446281 719008.2645 -490083
3 870000 0.751314801 653643.8768 163561.2
4 870000 0.683013455 594221.7062 757782.9
5 870000 0.620921323 540201.5511 1297984
6 870000 0.56447393 491092.3191 1789077
Pay Back Period = Initial Investment/ Annual Cash flow 2.74977
(Du and Girma, 2009)
The discounted payback period calculations express that the total invested amount
would be get back by the organization in 2.75 years which expresses about a good position of
the investment.
The accounting rate of return:
The accounting rate of return is a part of capital investment appraisal technique, it
evaluates about the total return of the investment option which would be get back by the
company. Following is the calculations of accounting rate of return of the company:
Calculation of ARR
Years Cash Outflow
Cash
Inflow depreciation
Net cash
inflow
0 20,00,000
1 350000 1220000 250000 970000
2 350000 1220000 250000 970000
3 350000 1220000 250000 970000
4 350000 1220000 250000 970000
5 350000 1220000 250000 970000
6 350000 1720000 250000 1470000
6 500000
683333.3333 1053333

Financial management and control 12
ARR
AVERAGE
ACCOUNTING
PROFIT/
AVERAGE
INVESTMENT 1.54146
(Borio, 2014)
The accounting rate of return expresses that the total accounting rate of the project
would be 1.54% which expresses about a good position of the investment.
The net present value:
Net present value is also a part of capital investment appraisal technique, it evaluates
about the total return of the investment option which would be get back by the company.
Following is the calculations of net present value of the company:
Calculation of Net Present Value
Ye
ars
Cash
Outflow
Cash
Inflow
Factors
(1+(1+interest
rate))^years
P.V. ofCash
Inflow (cash
inflow * factors)
P.V. of Cash
Outflow (Cash
outflow *
factors)
0
20,00,00
0 1.000 - 20,00,000
1 3,50,000 12,20,000 0.909 11,09,091 3,18,182
2 3,50,000 12,20,000 0.826 10,08,264 2,89,256
3 3,50,000 12,20,000 0.751 9,16,604 2,62,960
4 3,50,000 12,20,000 0.683 8,33,276 2,39,055
5 3,50,000 12,20,000 0.621 7,57,524 2,17,322
6 3,50,000 12,20,000 0.564 6,88,658 1,97,566
6 5,00,000 0.564 2,82,237
55,95,655 35,24,341
NPV= Total Cash Inflow-Total cash outflow 20,71,314
The net present value of return express that the total profit of the project would be $
35,24,341 which expresses about a good position of the investment

Financial management and control 13
The initial rate of return:
The initial rate of return is a part of capital investment appraisal technique, it evaluates
about the total return in which the initial rate of return of the company becomes zero.
Calculation Of IRR
Years
Cash
Outflow
Cash
Inflow Factors
P.V. ofCash
Inflow
P.V. of Cash
Outflow
0 20,00,000 1 0 2000000
1 350000 1220000 0.90909 1109091 318182
2 350000 1220000 0.82645 1008264 289256
3 350000 1220000 0.75131 916604 262960
4 350000 1220000 0.68301 833276 239055
5 350000 1220000 0.62092 757524 217322
6 350000 1220000 0.56447 688658 197566
6 500000 0.56447 282237
5595655 3524341
Calculation Of IRR
Years
Cash
Outflow
Cash
Inflow Factors
P.V. ofCash
Inflow
P.V. of Cash
Outflow
0 ####### 1 0 2000000
1 350000 1220000 0.89286 1089286 312500
2 350000 1220000 0.79719 972577 279018
3 350000 1220000 0.71178 868372 249123
4 350000 1220000 0.63552 775332 222431
5 350000 1220000 0.56743 692261 198599
6 350000 1220000 0.50663 618090 177321
6 500000 0.50663 253316
5269232 3438993
CF1
+
CF2
+
CF3
+ ...
− Initial
Investment
= 0( 1 + r )1 ( 1 + r )2 ( 1 + r )3
Internal rate of return = 10.13%
It explains that the internal rate of return of the project is 10.13%. If the cost of
company is lower than this % then the project should be accepted by the company.

Financial management and control 14
Que b)
The Payback Period:
Payback period is one of the capital budgeting techniques that are evaluated to
analyze the investment opportunity of the company. While calculating the payback period,
net cash inflow and outflow is taken into the context to evaluate the total time period that is
required by an organization to pull back the outflow of a speculation in terms of profit.
Key Benefits:
This technique is one of the popular techniques of capital budgeting as the
calculations of this process is quite simple as well as it expresses about the total time period.
It makes it easier for the company and the management to make a better analysis. This
technique also evaluates the investment opportunity for small businesses.
Limitations:
Payback period process does not take the concern of time value of money as well as it
is not useful technique for the long term project. The complexity level of the process is quite
higher as well as the process is not much reliable (Fernandes, Lynch and Netemeyer, 2014).
Thus it has been evaluated that this payback period process doesn’t assist the
companies to take decision about the long term project. It assists the management of the
company to make better conclusion about the new investments.
The discounted Payback Period:
Discounted payback period is one of the capital budgeting techniques that are
evaluated to analyze the investment opportunity of the company. While calculating the
payback period, net cash inflow and net cash outflow is taken into the context to evaluate the
total time period that is required by an organization to pull back the outflow of a speculation
in terms of profit (Gitman and Zutter, 2012).
Key Benefits:
This technique is one of the popular techniques of capital budgeting as the
calculations of this process is quite simple as well as it expresses about the total time period.
It makes it easier for the company and the management to make a better analysis. This

Financial management and control 15
technique also evaluates the investment opportunity for small businesses. It also takes the
concern of the time value of money.
Limitations:
Discounted Payback period process does not take the concern of investments after the
payback period. The complexity level of the process is quite higher as well as the process is
not much reliable.
Thus it has been evaluated that this discounted payback period process doesn’t assist
the companies to take decision about the long term project. It assists the management of the
company to make better conclusion about the new investments.
The Accounting Rate of Return:
Accounting rate of return is one of the capital budgeting techniques that are evaluated
to analyze the investment opportunity of the company. While calculating the accounting rate
of return, net cash inflow and net cash outflow is taken into the context to evaluate the total
return which would be got by the company.
Key Benefits:
This technique is one of the popular techniques of capital budgeting as the
calculations of this process is quite simple as well as it expresses about the total accounting
return of the project. It makes it easier for the company and the management to make a better
analysis. This technique also evaluates the total return of the project of small company as
well as large company.
Limitations:
Accounting rate of return process does not take the concern of time value of money as
well as it is not useful technique for the long term project. It does not express the perfect
result (Gambacorta and Signoretti, 2014).
Thus it has been evaluated that this accounting rate of return process doesn’t assist the
companies to take decision about the long term project. It manipulates the management of the
company to make better conclusion about the new investments.
The Net Present Value:

Financial management and control 16
Net present value expressed about the total return of the company which would be got
back by the company after investing into a particular project.
Key Benefits:
This technique is one of the popular techniques of capital budgeting. The calculation
express about the total profit. It makes it easier for the company and the management to make
a better analysis. It also takes the concern of the time value of money.
Limitations:
Net present value process does not express a reliable result. It is based on many
assumptions. The complexity level of the process is quite higher as well as the process is not
much reliable (Horngren et al, 2005)
Thus it has been evaluated that this net present value process doesn’t assist the
companies to take decision about the long term project.
The Internal Rate of Return:
Internal rate of return expresses about the total return % of a particular project.
Key Benefits:
This technique is one of the popular techniques of capital budgeting. It makes it easier
for the company and the management to make a better analysis. It also takes the concern of
the time value of money.
Limitations:
Calculations of this process is quite difficult as well as it is quite manipulative. The
complexity level of the process is quite higher as well as the process is not much reliable
(Kaplan and Atkinson, 2015).
Thus it has been evaluated that this internal rate of return process doesn’t assist the
companies to make better conclusion about the new investments.
Que c)
Internal and external sources of the company:

Financial management and control 17
If the Jonson limited invests into the company than it is required for the company to
raise the funds from various sources (Grinblatt and Titman, 2016). The funds could be
generated through internal as well as external ways. The given case explains that the
£2,000,000 would be required for the company for 6 years. It explains that the long term
investment os required for this project. Following ways could be used to generate the funds:
Shares:
Company could issue new shares in the market to raise the funds and manage the
performance of the company.
Debentures:
Company could also issue new debentures in the market for a limited period of time
to raise the funds and manage the performance of the company (Bierman and Smidt, 2012).
Loan from bank:
Loan could also be taken by the company to raise the funds for a particular investment
project of the company.
These sources could assist the company to manage and enhance the level of the
company as well as the funds of the company.

Financial management and control 18
References:
Airaudo, M., Nisticò, S. and Zanna, L.F., 2015. Learning, monetary policy, and asset
prices. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 47(7), pp.1273-1307.
Bandy, G. 2013. Financial management and accounting in the public sector. Oxon:
Routledge.
Bierman Jr, H. and Smidt, S., 2012. The capital budgeting decision: economic analysis of
investment projects. Routledge.
Borio, C., 2014. The financial cycle and macroeconomics: What have we learnt?. Journal of
Banking & Finance, 45, pp.182-198.
Brigham, E.F. and Ehrhardt, M.C., 2013. Financial management: Theory & practice.
Cengage Learning.
Deegan, C., 2013. Financial accounting theory. McGraw-Hill Education Australia.
Du, J. and Girma, S., 2009. Source of finance, growth and firm size: evidence from
China (No. 2009.03). Research paper/UNU-WIDER.
Fernandes, D., Lynch Jr, J.G. and Netemeyer, R.G., 2014. Financial literacy, financial
education, and downstream financial behaviors. Management Science, 60(8), pp.1861-1883.
Galí, J., 2015. Monetary policy, inflation, and the business cycle: an introduction to the new
Keynesian framework and its applications. Princeton University Press.
Gambacorta, L. and Signoretti, F.M., 2014. Should monetary policy lean against the wind?:
An analysis based on a DSGE model with banking. Journal of Economic Dynamics and
Control, 43, pp.146-174.
Gitman, L.J. and Zutter, C.J., 2012. Principles of managerial finance. Prentice Hall.
Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S., 2016. Financial markets & corporate strategy. Prentice Hall.

Financial management and control 19
Horngren, C.T., Sundem, G.L., Stratton, W.O., Burgstahler, D. and Schatzberg, J.,
2005. Introduction to management accounting. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice
Hall.
Jaumotte, F., Lall, S. and Papageorgiou, C., 2013. Rising income inequality: technology, or
trade and financial globalization?. IMF Economic Review, 61(2), pp.271-309.
Kaplan, R.S. and Atkinson, A.A., 2015. Advanced management accounting. PHI Learning.
Kiran, R. S., & Singh, V. K. 2014. How to make the financial analysis an easy task – A
comparative analysis between the traditional and the modern approach? International Journal
of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(8), 61-66.
Kurov, A. and Stan, R., 2016. Monetary Policy Uncertainty and the Market Reaction to
Macroeconomic News: Evidence from the Taper Tantrum.
Romney, M.B., Steinbart, P.J., Zhang, R. and Xu, G., 2006. Accounting information systems.
Pearson Education.
Shapiro, A.C., 2005. Capital budgeting and investment analysis. Prentice Hall.

Financial management and control 20
Appendix:
Liquidity ratio
(amount in £ '000)
2016 2015
Current ratio
£
1.38
£
2.91
Quick ratio
£
1.06
£
2.36
Working note
1) current ratio
current ratio= current assets/current liabilities
Given:
(amount in £ '000)
current Assets 6503 7006
current liabilities 4701 2410
2) Quick ratio
Quick ratio= quick assets/current
liabilities
quick assets= current assets- inventory
Given:
(amount in £ '000)
Quick Assets (Current assets- inventory) 4960 5686
Current liabilities 4701 2410
Profitability ratio analysis
(amount in £ '000)
Profitability Ratios 2016 2015
Return on shareholder fund 0.048956 0.028693
ROCE 0.094829 0.071527
Gross profit ratio 0.390169 0.358616
Gross Profit 7382 5825
net profit raio 0.051419 0.035103
1) return on shareholder fund
return on shareholder fund = (net income

Financial management and control 21
after interest and tax/ average stock
equity)*100
here,
(amount in £ '000)
PAT 972.84 570.17
Average stock equity 19871.58
2) ROCE
ROCE= Net operating profit/ employed
capital
Employed capital= Total assets- current
liabilities
given
(amount in £ '000)
Operating Profit 2582 1783
total assets 31929 27337.6
Current liabilities 4701 2410
3) Gross Profit Ratio
Gross Profit Ratio= (Total Sales-Cost of goods sold)/ Total Sales
Here
(amount in £ '000)
Total sales 18920 16243
Cost of goods sold 11538 10418
4) gross Profit
Grosss Profit= sales- COGS
5) Net Profit Ratio
(amount in £ '000)
Net Profit 972.84 570.17
Sales 18920 16243
Investment ratio analysis
2016 2015
(amount in £ '000)
EPS 0.07839 0.04594
dividend payout 0.51396 0.87693
net profit raio 0.05142 0.0351
Working Note:
1) Earning Per share

Financial management and control 22
EPS= Total earnings/ outstanding shares
Given,
(amount in £ '000)
Total Earnings 972.84 570.17
Outstanding shares 12410 12410
2) Dividend Payout
DP= Dividend/ Net Income
Given,
(amount in £ '000)
Dividend 500 500
Net Income 972.84 570.17
3) Net Profit Ratio
(amount in £ '000)
Net Profit 972.84 570.17
Sales 18920 16243
Gearing ratio analysis
2016 2015
(amount in £ '000)
Gearing ratio/debt equity 1.13521 17.85
Debt Ratio 0.36678 0.03662
Interest cover/ time interest
earned 5.3886 6.34904
1)
(amount in £ '000)
Gearing ratio 0.2615 0.21229
Debt Equity 0.23035 0.01189
Gearing ratio= Long term Liabilities/ capital
employed
Debt Equity ratio= total
liabilties/ (total assets-total
liabilities)
2) Debt Ratio
Debt ratio= Total Liabilities/ Total Assets
(amount in £ '000)
Total Liabilities 11821 7702
Total Assets 32229 210338

Financial management and control 23
3) Interest cover/ time interest
earned
Interest Cover= EBIT/Interest Expenses
(amount in £ '000)
EBIT 2582 1783
Interest Expenses 479.16 280.83
Asset Utilization ratio
2016 2015
(amount in £ '000)
Debtors Turnover 3.81452 3.83995
Total Assets Turnover 0.59256 0.07722
working note
1) Debtors Turnover
DT= Net Credit Sales/ average accounts
receivable
(amount in £ '000)
Net credit sales 18920 16243
(assumption: total sales is on credit)
Average accounts receivable 4960 4230
2) Total Assets
Total Assets= Net Sales/Average total assets
(amount in £ '000)
Net Sales 18920 16243
Average total assets 31929 210338