Financial Management: Analysis of BRK's Acquisition of Precision Castparts Corporation
Verified
Added on 2022/10/31
|8
|1348
|362
AI Summary
This article provides an analysis of BRK's acquisition of Precision Castparts Corporation, including investor interpretation, comparable companies concern, cost of capital, net present value, and Buffet's investment philosophy.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Question 1 The interpretation of the investor towards the announcement that BRK would purchase precision Castparts Corporation for a total cost of $37.2 billion has been determined below. From the overall analysis it can be stated that Precision are gaining by 19.11% to $231 in the pre- market which have been trading. According to the index the share price of the Berkshire Company, the share price of the company has toggled and the acquisition of PCP Berkshire Hathaway’s largest deal ever. According to the reviews the trends lines of Berkshire Hathaway reached to double the level of the returns. The relationship between the trend lines is kind of the inverse relationship and this defines that the market forces are not having major impact on the share price of the company. The average returns determined by the S&P 500 index is less than the returns scored by Berkshire Hathaway. He investors thought this deal would destroy value of BRK. However, the price paid for PCP exceeded the present value of its future cash flows (Stempel, 2015). 19761979198219851988199119941997200020032006200920122015 $10 $100 $1,000 $10,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 Berkshire Hathaway Class A Shares versus S&P 500 Index over 39 Years (INDEX) Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class A - Price (INDEX) S&P 500 - Price
Running Head: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Question 2 Comparable companies concern While the company is valued on the basis of the comparable methods is a relative valuation method in which the current value of the business is calculated by looking at the trading multiples like P/E, EV/EBITDA or other ratios. The valuation based on the comparable firm’s method defines the bid price of $37.2 billion for PCP is completely in relation with Exhibit 11. Under the comparable method the range starts from 0.76 to 1.02 whereas in case of market value of the enterprise the range starts from 6.68 to 45.05. Further, the implied value of the median multiple of EBIT is $37755 million (Bae, Bhattacharya, Kang & Rhee, 2019). Question 3 The cost of capital is the rate which defines the opportunity cost of making the specific investment. This rate is basically the rate used by the investors that could have been used in the same manner for the other investments as well. The capital rate that is beneficial and appropriate hurdle rate for the purpose of investment in PCP is 5.13%, as it will deliver the positive net cash flows of the company after discounting those cash flows. Secondly the cost of capita determines the rate at which the investments will be valued.The WACC of 5.12% is the appropriate rate and it is the rate of the acquired firm. hence, it is the rate which is requiredto be followed by Berkshire Hathaway(Krüger, Landier & Thesmar, 2015). Question 4 The calculation of the net present value has been calculated on the basis of the formula that applies the rate of return for both 5.1% and 8.05%. This is to make sure that both the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Running Head: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT alternatives are analyzed and the best proposal is accepted. As per using the discounting rate of 5.01% the net present value of Berkshire Hathaway comes at $17695.48, whereas the net present value in case of 8.05% turns out to be ($11268.98). This simple indicates that the benefit is more in terms of the rate used of PCP Company rather than its own WACC. Further the annual cash flows have been same in both the cases except in the year 2018 as the free cash flows have been added in it. The positive amount reflects that the company will have a future potential whereas the negative amount will reflect that the potential future growth will not be acquired by the company. in this present case on the basis of DCF analysis the payment made by Buffett is not too much and the he scored a great deal(Magni, 2015). Question 5 Buffet’s investment philosophy focuses majorly on the economic reality and not on the accounting reality. Buffet is having a thought that the economic reality is the key element in deciding the guiding the investment decisions. In the philosophy the thoughts of Warren Buffet is considered ass intangible assets to be really valuable for the company. Secondly the cost of the investment in the other is the next best alternative. In order to be sure the whether the acquisition/ investment shall be considered and this was treated as the one of the important standard. The comparison of the alternatives will help in choosing that alternative which provides the higher value. It becomes imperative to compare the investments(Ramraika & Trivedi, 2016). The third element focuses on the intrinsic value where the potential returns and the attractiveness of the investments are compared. His opinion is valid as the book value is
Running Head: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT calculated on the basis of the book value whereas the future value is required as the intrinsic value deviates. The next element to focus is on the evaluating the performance of the business on the basis of the intrinsic value rather than taking the accounting profit. The major aim is to maximize the average annual rate of gain by utilizing the per share basis(Arnold, 2018). In this particular element the theory of traditional finance is way different in than the philosophy of an entrepreneur. In the light of the business the potential business that are less efficient are also considered by Buffett. In his option one must invest in the inefficient business that holds enough potential to grow rather than the efficient business(HARTWIG, 2019). Finally the major attention of Buffet is on interests of entrepreneurs and investors as it becomesimportantfortoanalyzeeachandeveryparameter.Ithasbeensaidthatthe management of the firm and the shareholders should have the same goals but yet a mutual point shall be there in order to create the balance between the needs of the owners as well as that of the agents (PCC, 2016).
Running Head: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT References Arnold,G.(2018).WARRENBUFFETT:LearningThroughtheSchoolofHard Knocks.Financial History, (125), 20-24. Bae, K. H., Bhattacharya, U., Kang, J., & Rhee, S. G. (2019). Nominal stock price anchors: A global phenomenon?.Journal of Financial Markets,44, 31-41. HARTWIG, K. (2019). 6 Magic and the Market: A Case Study of Warren Buffett and Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway.Culture and Economy: Contemporary Perspectives, 29. Krüger, P., Landier, A., & Thesmar, D. (2015). The WACC fallacy: The real effects of using a unique discount rate.The Journal of Finance,70(3), 1253-1285. Magni, C. A. (2015). Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation.European Journal of Operational Research,244(3), 855-866. PCC, (2016).Berkshire Hathaway Completes Acquisition of Precision Castparts. Retrieved from https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2016/01/29/806102/0/en/Berkshire- Hathaway-Completes-Acquisition-of-Precision-Castparts.html Ramraika, C. F. A., & Trivedi, P. (2016). Economies of Scale: An Analytical Framework for Assessment of a Firm's Competitive Advantage.Multi-Act EquiGlobe, Perspectives: Economies of Scale.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.