Investment Proposal Analysis for New Medicine

This assignment requires students to critically evaluate an investment proposal for the development of a new constipation medicine. The analysis involves calculating Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and considering the potential impact of contract manufacturing on the project's profitability. Students must justify their recommendation to the management based on the financial feasibility of the project.

Running Head: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Financial Management
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Authors Note:

1FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Table of Contents
Requirement 1:.................................................................................................................................2
Requirement 2:.................................................................................................................................3
Requirement 3:.................................................................................................................................4
Reference.........................................................................................................................................9

2FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Requirement 1:
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6
Increase in revenue:
Sales of new product 2,430,000.00 2,930,000.00 3,680,000.00 3,753,600.00 3,828,672.00 3,905,245.44
Contract manufacturing 510,000.00 560,000.00 635,000.00 647,700.00 660,654.00 673,867.08
(A) Increase in Revenue 2,940,000.00 3,490,000.00 4,315,000.00 4,401,300.00 4,489,326.00 4,579,112.52
Increase in expenditures:
Raw materials:
New products 729,000.00 879,000.00 1,104,000.00 1,126,080.00 1,148,601.60 1,171,573.63
Contract Manufacturing 127,500.00 140,000.00 158,750.00 161,925.00 165,163.50 168,466.77
Lost Sales net of variable cost 626,250.00 757,500.00 945,000.00 963,900.00 983,178.00 1,002,841.56
Wages 150,000.00 153,000.00 156,060.00 159,181.20 162,364.82 165,612.12
Factory overhead 529,200.00 628,200.00 776,700.00 792,234.00 808,078.68 824,240.25
Repaid and Maintenance 15,000.00 30,000.00 30,600.00 31,212.00 31,836.24
Advertisement 375,000.00 375,000.00 300,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00
Preliminary Expenses 332,000.00
Interests 35,586.00 31,204.26 26,482.35 21,393.87 15,910.36 10,001.15
Depreciation on:
Equipment 176,666.67 176,666.67 176,666.67 176,666.67 176,666.67 176,666.67
Building 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00
(B) Increase in Expenditure 3,088,702.66 3,163,070.92 3,681,159.02 3,589,480.74 3,648,675.63 3,708,738.39
Net Profit Before Tax 148,702.66- 326,929.08 633,840.98 811,819.26 840,650.37 870,374.13
Less: Tax @30% 98,078.72 190,152.29 243,545.78 252,195.11 261,112.24
Profit after tax 148,702.66- 228,850.35 443,688.69 568,273.48 588,455.26 609,261.89
Add: Depreciation 184,166.67 184,166.67 184,166.67 184,166.67 184,166.67 184,166.67
Net Cash Inflow 35,464.00 413,017.02 627,855.35 752,440.15 772,621.92 793,428.56
Present Value Factor@15% pa. 0.87 0.76 0.66 0.57 0.50 0.43
Present value of Net cash inflow 30,838.26 312,300.20 412,825.09 430,210.10 384,129.65 343,021.06
Particulars Amount Amount
Present value of total cash inflow 1,913,324.36
Add: Present value of working capital realized 64,849.14
Present value of salvage 86,465.52
151,314.66
2,064,639.02
Less: Initial Investment 1260000
Net Present Value (NPV) 804,639.02
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 IRR
On discounted cash flow 1,260,000.00- 30,838.26 312,300.20 412,825.09 430,210.10 384,129.65 343,021.06 11%
On normal cash flow 1,260,000.00- 35,464.00 413,017.02 627,855.35 752,440.15 772,621.92 793,428.56 28%

3FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

4FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Requirement 2:
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6
Increase in revenue:
Sales of new product 2,430,000.00 2,930,000.00 3,680,000.00 3,753,600.00 3,828,672.00 3,905,245.44
Contract manufacturing
(A) Increase in Revenue 2,430,000.00 2,930,000.00 3,680,000.00 3,753,600.00 3,828,672.00 3,905,245.44
Increase in expenditures:
Raw materials:
New products 729,000.00 879,000.00 1,104,000.00 1,126,080.00 1,148,601.60 1,171,573.63
Contract Manufacturing
Lost Sales net of variable cost 626,250.00 757,500.00 945,000.00 963,900.00 983,178.00 1,002,841.56
Wages 100,000.00 102,000.00 104,040.00 106,120.80 108,243.22 110,408.08
Factory overhead 437,400.00 527,400.00 662,400.00 675,648.00 689,160.96 702,944.18
Repaid and Maintenance 15,000.00 30,000.00 30,600.00 31,212.00 31,836.24
Advertisement 375,000.00 375,000.00 300,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00
Preliminary Expenses 332,000.00
Interests 35,586.00 31,204.26 26,482.35 21,393.87 15,910.36 10,001.15
Depreciation on:
Equipment 176,666.67 176,666.67 176,666.67 176,666.67 176,666.67 176,666.67
Building 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00
(B) Increase in Expenditure 2,819,402.66 2,871,270.92 3,356,089.02 3,257,909.34 3,310,472.80 3,363,771.51
Net Profit Before Tax 389,402.66- 58,729.08 323,910.98 495,690.66 518,199.20 541,473.93
Less: Tax @30% 17,618.72 97,173.29 148,707.20 155,459.76 162,442.18
Profit after tax 389,402.66- 41,110.35 226,737.69 346,983.46 362,739.44 379,031.75
Add: Depreciation 184,166.67 184,166.67 184,166.67 184,166.67 184,166.67 184,166.67
Net Cash Inflow 205,236.00- 225,277.02 410,904.35 531,150.13 546,906.10 563,198.42
Present Value Factor@15% pa. 0.87 0.76 0.66 0.57 0.50 0.43
Present value of Net cash inflow 178,466.08- 170,341.79 270,176.28 303,686.81 271,908.99 243,486.22
Particulars Amount Amount
Present value of total cash inflow 1,081,134.01
Add: Present value of working capital realized 64,849.14
Present value of salvage 86,465.52
151,314.66
1,232,448.67
Less: Initial Investment 1,260,000.00
Net Present Value (NPV) (27,551.33)
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 IRR
On discounted cash flow -1260000 178,466.08- 170,341.79 270,176.28 303,686.81 271,908.99 243,486.22 -3%
On normal cash flow -1260000 -205235.9953 225277.0209 410904.3547 531150.13 546906.1045 563198.4188 11%

5FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Requirement 3:
Introduction:
The management of a company mainly concern about making optimum use of the
available resources of the company. Investing in different invest proposals such as whether to
buy a new equipment or not; whether to invest on a new product or not; such decisions are taken
after conducting investment appraisal tests on such proposals. Only if an organization is expected
to earn profit from an investment proposal that the management would go ahead and invest in
such proposal (Bodie 2013).
Investment appraisal techniques:
Accordingly, the management of Austrochemicals Limited shall conduct necessary
investment appraisal tests on the investment proposal of developing a new medicine for
constipation problem in adults without any substantial side effects. Net present value and Internal
Rate of Return of a project will give the management necessary parameters about the expected
financial outcome of investing in developing the new medicine (Brigham and Ehrhardt 2013).
Analysis of the outcomes of investment appraisal techniques:
The management has ascertained Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return
(IRR) of the new investment proposal in front of the company. In order to address the concern of
Anna the calculation of NPV and IRR of the new investment proposal have conducted in two
separate occasions, firstly; the NPV and IRR of the project have been calculated taking into
consideration the 100% utilization of the new equipment, including the contract manufacturing.
Thus, firstly; the calculation of NPV and IRR includes both revenue and expenditures of new
product as well as contract manufacturing. In the second calculation, the NPV and IRR have

6FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
been calculated only assuming that the new equipment will only be used for development of new
medicine and thus, the expenditures and revenue from contract manufacturing were ignored
(Leary, M.T. and Roberts 2014).
NPV:
NPV is the estimate of probable net cash flow of a project over its life time after
adjusting the discounting factor for time value of money. The NPV of the new medicine as can
be seen at the beginning of the document inclusive of revenue and expenditures of contract
manufacturing of $804639.02 is positive and clearly indicates that the company will be able to
earn positive net cash inflow from the project over its lifetime of six years (Grinblatt and Titman
2016). The short calculation of the NPV provided below for the management below.
Particulars Amount Amount
Present value of total cash inflow 1,913,324.36
Add: Present value of working capital realized 64,849.14
Present value of salvage 86,465.52
151,314.66
2,064,639.02
Less: Initial Investment 1260000
Net Present Value (NPV) 804,639.02
Management in such a case would be willing to invest in the project as the NPV is
positive. However, the management is also concerned with the ability of the new product only to
recover the initial investment thus, before taking the decision of investment in the project it
would be better to evaluate the outcome of the project excluding the revenue and expenditures of
contract manufacturing (Petty et al. 2015).

7FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
NPV of the project without taking into consideration the revenue and expenditures of contract
manufacturing is provided below for the analysis of the management:
Particulars Amount Amount
Present value of total cash inflow
1,081,134.01
Add: Present value of working capital
realized 64,849.14
Present value of salvage
86,465.52
151,314.66
1,232,448.67
Less: Initial Investment
1,260,000.00
Net Present Value (NPV)
(27,551.33)
The expected NPV of the project is negative if the revenue and expenditures of contract
manufacturing are ignored. With negative NPV of $27551.33 the management will have to think
hard before investing in the new project (Qiu et al. 2016).
IRR:
Internal rate of return under two different circumstances, i.e. with contract manufacturing
and without contract manufacturing, are as following:
With Contract manufacturing:
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 IRR
On discounted cash flow -1260000 30,838.26 312,300.20 412,825.09 430,210.10 384,129.65 343,021.06 11%
On normal cash flow -1260000 35464.00467 413017.0209 627855.3547 752440.15 772621.9249 793428.5556 28%

8FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Both after adjusting discounting factor and before adjusting discounting factor IRRs of the new
project is desirable and thus, management would be attracted to invest in the project. However,
the IRRs of the project would be completely different without taking the revenue and
expenditures of contract manufacturing (Dittmar and Duchin 2015).
Without contract manufacturing:
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 IRR
On discounted cash flow -1260000 178,466.08- 170,341.79 270,176.28 303,686.81 271,908.99 243,486.22 -3%
On normal cash flow -1260000 -205235.9953 225277.0209 410904.3547 531150.13 546906.1045 563198.4188 11%
As can be seen from the table above the company will have -3% and 11% IRRs after adjusting
discounting factor and before adjustment of discounting factor. Clearly, the management in such
a situation will have to completely certain about the expected revenue and expenditures on
contract manufacturing before taking final decision of investing in the new project (Ortas et al.
2015).
Conclusion and Recommendations:
Based on the NPVs of the project, it is clear that the new product on its own will not be
able to recover the investments to be made on the proposal at the beginning as NPV of the
project is negative without considering the revenue and expenditures of contract manufacturing.
However, at the same time it is also clear that the equipment if purchased will only be used up-to
50% capacity to manufacture the required amount of new medicine to be supplied to the
customers thus, the balance 50% capacity of the equipment will remain idle and the management
should use the idle capacity for contract manufacturing. Thus, provided the management is
certain about the accrual of revenue and the expenditures associated with contract manufacturing

9FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
then ,the management should invest in the new project to develop the medicine and shared the
balance 50% capacity of the of equipment for contract manufacturing. IRR of the project before
adjustment of discounting factor at 28% and after adjustment of discounting rate 15% per annum
at 11% are also desirable from the point of view of AL. Thus, the management should go ahead
and make investment to acquire the new equipment necessary for development of the medicine.
The NPV of the investment proposal even if negative without considering the revenue
and expenditures of contract manufacturing with - $27551.33 however, still the management
should invest in the project even if the contract manufacturing does not materialize. This is
despite that fact that the IRR of the project with discounted cash inflow is -3% because the
company has already incurred expenditure on research and development of the medicine of
$332000.00 and if the management decides not invest in the development of the new medicine
then the loss would be far greater than -$27551.33 with $332000.00. Hence, the company should
invest $1260000.00 to acquire the new equipment needed for the development of the
constipation medicine.

10FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Reference
Bodie, Z., 2013. Investments. McGraw-Hill.
Brigham, E.F. and Ehrhardt, M.C., 2013. Financial management: Theory & practice. Cengage
Learning.
Dittmar, A. and Duchin, R., 2015. Looking in the Rearview Mirror: The Effect of Managers'
Professional Experience on Corporate Financial Policy. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(3),
pp.565-602.
Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S., 2016. Financial markets & corporate strategy.
Leary, M.T. and Roberts, M.R., 2014. Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy?. The
Journal of Finance, 69(1), pp.139-178.
Ortas, E., Gallego‐Alvarez, I. and Álvarez Etxeberria, I., 2015. Financial factors influencing the
quality of corporate social responsibility and environmental management disclosure: A quantile
regression approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6),
pp.362-380.
Petty, J.W., Titman, S., Keown, A.J., Martin, P., Martin, J.D. and Burrow, M., 2015. Financial
management: Principles and applications. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A. and Tharyan, R., 2016. Environmental and social disclosures: Link with
corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), pp.102-116.