Investigation of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) And Its Relationship with Other Parts Of The Energy System In The United States

First Name Last Name
instructor
Geography: Sustainable energy
1 July 2019
Investigation of Carbon Capture and Storage (Ccs) And Its Relationship with Other Parts
Of The Energy System In The United States.
1. Introduction
Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) is the capture and safe storage of carbon
dioxide (CO2) that would or else be released into the atmosphere. The main Carbon
Capture and Storage attempts are currently focused on removing carbon dioxide straight
from manufacturing or utility processes and then storing it in safe geological reservoirs.
The justification for CCS is to allow fossil fuels to be used while reducing CO2
emissions into the atmosphere and thus mitigating worldwide climate change ("Carbon
capture and storage projects", 2015).
Currently, fossil fuels are the leading source of main worldwide supply of energy and are
likely to stay so for the remainder of the century. Over eighty-five percent of all main
electricity is supplied by fossil fuels; the remainder consists of nuclear, hydroelectric, and
renewable energy (geothermal, solar, commercial biomass, and wind) (Bandyopadhyay,
2014).
While many countries are making excellent attempts and investments to improve the
segment of renewable energy in principal energy supply and promote management and
effectiveness improvements in fossil fuel use, addressing climate change concerns over
the coming decades will probably involve substantial CCS contributions (Mitchel, 2017).

Jae Edmonds1reported in his keynote address at the 9th International Conference on
Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9, November 2008) that "preparations for
the 5th Assessment Report of the IPCC stated that meeting low carbon stability
boundaries is only feasible with CCS."
1.1. Components of a CCS system.
 Capture: Even though there is no distinctive way of breaking down a CCS
scheme into its component parts, the following are typical elements.
 Separating CO2 from an effluent stream and compressing it into a liquid or
supercritical2state. The resulting CO2 concentration is > 99 percent in most
instances today, although reduced levels may be acceptable. To be able to
transport and store CO2 economically, capture is usually needed (Boyd,
2017).
 Transport. The movement of CO2 from its source to the storage reservoir.
While transportation by ship, train, and truck is all conceivable, the most
economical way of transporting large quantities is through a pipeline
(Stephenson, 2013).
 Injection. Deposit CO2 into the storage tank. Because today's main storage
reservoirs are geological formations. Other prospective reservoirs consist of
mineralization (CO2-to-mineral conversion) or deep ocean sediments. While
commercial use of CO2may is feasible, the quantity that can be used will be
very low compared to the quantity of CO2 released from power plants (Al-
Hitmi, 2012).
2 | P a g e

 Monitoring. It must be supervised once the CO2 is in the ground (Rode,
Schaerer, Marinello, & Hantelmann, 2018). Because CO2 is neither poisonous
nor combustible, it only presents a trifling threat to the environment, health,
and security. The primary aim of surveillance is to ensure efficient
sequestration operation, meaning that nearly all the atmosphere's CO2 stays
out for millennia or longer (Boyd, 2017).
It ought to be observed that all Carbon Capture and Storage system's parts are now
commercial. The task for CCS to be deemed commercial is to incorporate and scale
up these parts.
The aims of this document are to define the essentials of Carbon Capture and Storage
technology, converse the technology's present status and cost, and reconnoiter the policy
context needed for Carbon Capture and Storage to turn out to be ann important climate
change mitigation possibility. The document is as follows split into parts. Section II
discusses the Current state of the technology use, while Chapter III explains the Impact
on the energy system and other fuels. Sections IV (Technical developments, now and into
future), V (Barriers and opportunities including costs), and VI (personal view on the
technology, based on the evidence).
2. The current state of the technology.
Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) is regarded as a key strategy for meeting
objectives for reducing CO2 emissions. This paper reviews and discusses multiple
elements of CCS including state-of-the-art CO2 capture, separation, transportation,
storage, leakage, tracking, and life cycle analysis techniques. Specific CO2 capture
technology choice is highly dependent on the type of plant and fuel producing CO2 used.
3 | P a g e

Due to its greater effectiveness and reduced price, absorption is the most mature and
frequently accepted among these procedures of CO2 separation (Carbon capture and
storage: the CarbonNet Project, 2013).
For big volumes of CO2 transport, a pipeline is regarded as the most feasible solution.
Enhanced oil recovery is mature and has been practiced for many years among those
geological formations for CO2 storage, but its economic viability for anthropogenic
sources needs to be proven (Copsey, 2016). Because of their enormous prospective
storage capability, there are increasing interests in CO2 storage in saline aquifers and
several initiatives are in the pipeline to demonstrate their viability. CCS deployment has
multiple hurdles, including the lack of a clear business case for CCS investment and the
lack of robust economic incentives to support the additional high capital and operating
costs of the entire CCS process (Jeremey, 2014).
Although many of CCS ' component systems are comparatively mature, there are no fully
integrated CCS projects on a business scale in service to date. Figure-1.
a. Capture techniques are based on those used in the chemical and refining sectors for
centuries, but it is still necessary to demonstrate the inclusion of this technology in
the specific context of energy manufacturing (F, 2018).
b. In the central U.S., which has more than 5,000 km of such pipelines, CO2 transport
over long distances through pipelines has demonstrated successful for more than 30
years14). Its aim is to recover enhanced petroleum–to inject CO2 into petroleum
areas to boost petroleum output (H, 2017).
4 | P a g e

c. CO2 storage projects in Sleipner (Norway), Weyburn (Canada) and Salah (Algeria)
have been operational globally for at least 10 years. The sector can also build on the
understanding gained through the decades-old geological storage of natural gas.
Figure-1. CCS component technologies stages.[
https://hub.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/carbon-capture-storage-assessing-
economics/33-current-state-ccs ].
Despite their relative maturity, there are still some uncertainties about these
techniques, such as issues about saline aquifers ' storage capacity.
Vattenfall's 30 MW Schwarze Pumpe oxy-fuel pilot capture project has recently been
launched in Germany. Several latest CCS projects have also been announced, for
example in Germany (RWE project Hürth), the USA (AEP Alstom Mountaineer),
Australia (Callide Oxyfuel) and China (GreenGen). There are no integrated
operations on a business scale to date ("Survey of CCS Technologies and Risks",
5 | P a g e

2017). The creation of the first set of such "demonstration" projects is usually
regarded as the next step in the growth of CCS. The aim would be to demonstrate
that the technology operates on a scale and in embedded value chains, to get a more
precise image of CCS ' real economics, to validate storage capacity and permanence,
to demonstrate transport safety, and to solve problems of government consciousness
and perception (Bergstrom & Ty, 2017).
3. Impact on the energy system and other fuels.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) includes capturing and burying deep underground
carbon dioxide from power plants and other industrial sources. But in addition to
maintaining out of the atmosphere a significant greenhouse gas (GHG), this technology
will lead to air pollution advantages and trade-offs (Fennell, Florin, Napp, & Hills, 2012).
A fresh European Environment Agency (EEA) study discusses the impacts CCS may
have on some important air pollutants ' emissions.
"Carbon capture and storage can bridge the gap for centuries to come, reducing emissions
until we can move to a low carbon economy," said EEA Executive Director Professor
Jacqueline McGlade. "Our study demonstrates that while CCS may have a general
beneficial impact on air pollution, some pollutant emissions may rise. It is highly
essential to understand these kinds of trade-offs if we are to implement this technology
across Europe and the globe."
Depending on the specific type of equipment used, CCS systems involve about 15-25%
more power, so plants with CCS need more fuel than standard plants. This, in turn, may
result in enhanced' direct emissions' from installations where CCS is assembled and
6 | P a g e