Re: GDP as a measuring rod (Response to Ashley) I agree with the assessment regarding GDP especially with regards to the fact that it leaves out the contribution of black market. This is especially relevant considering the fact that with regards to certain nations belonging to the developing and underdeveloped category, the contribution of black market could be significant and thereby the underlying system of GDP seems to favour the developed world where almost all the economy is formal in nature. Having said that there is no denying that GDP is a useful technique for assessment of economic development despite the shortfalls. Re:Samuelson Article (Response to Dawn) It is true that the difference between microeconomic and macroeconomic is quite stark. The essential element is the level of interpretation of a given phenomenon. Microeconomic involves viewing a situation or scenario from the perspective of an individual firm unlike macroeconomic which involves viewing the situation from the industry perspective. Often thiswouldresultinsignificantlydifferentexplanationsandconclusionsforagiven observation. However, it is imperative that microeconomics and macroeconomics are not considered two separate watertight containers as understanding can be enhanced by taking a collective view. Re: Consumer Price Index and GDP Deflator (Response to Geoffrey) I tend to disagree with Geoffrey on his perspective regarding inflation and simultaneously price fall. It is imperative to note that inflation essentially is computed through the weighted average price change in a defined basket of goods. Hence, it is possible that overall inflation is rising but a particular good or component is getting cheaper. With regards, to nominal and real GDP, the former represents the GDP computed at current price while the latter represented the GDP computed at the base year prices. As a result, the latter is a more faithful representation of economic growth.