Ending Gender Pay Inequality: Does it Require Transformation of Economic Purpose of Business?

This report analyses the debate between two groups on ending gender pay inequality and whether it requires transformation of economic purpose of business. The report identifies fallacies, justifies scores, and provides feedback on performance and room for improvement.

BUSINESS ECONOMICS

EXECUTIVE SUMMERY
In the present report, group C analysed the debate between the two groups: group A and group B.
The debate is based on the topic which is ending pay inequality does/ do not require
transformation of economic proposes of the business. Group A is arguing that it does required
transformation. Group B is in against of group A, therefore the members of the group are arguing
that it does not require transformation. By analysation of their debate the team members of group
c have finalized a judgment and have determined who performed well in the debate. In the
debate both attackers and oppressors will express their perspective on the topic of argument.

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................1
Grasp of Team Argument...........................................................................................................1
Identification of Fallacies............................................................................................................4
Justification of The Scores..........................................................................................................5
Feedback on the performance and room of improvement..........................................................6
Fairness and consistency in judging............................................................................................7
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................8
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................8

INTRODUCTION
Business economics refers to the study of components and functions of marketplace (Agarwal,
2018). In general, business economics is the applied studies that analyse the financial studies,
organizational, market-related, and environmental issues faced by business enterprises. This
study consists of the issues which is relevant to the fiscal, structure, market-related faced by the
organizations. Business economics gives assistance in identifying the internal as well as external
factors of the companies. The present report will examine the debate between two groups that is
group A and B on the topic ending gender pay inequality does / do not require a transformation
of the economic purpose of business in society.
MAIN BODY
Grasp of Team Argument
Argument of team A
Group A is arguing in the favour of ending gender pay difference does require an alteration of
the economical purpose of business in society. By supporting the argument according to the
group, gender inequality pays major role in modification of economical goal of business. The
gender equability supports the woman and empower them to lead the market equally. Due to
difference between the genders, it brings violence towards both genders. The alteration of the
inequity is required because as per the gross domestic product of group A, it increases rapidly.
The employment of the organization increased and gave assistance in decreasing the scale of
poverty. To end the gender equality, it is very important to bring changes like the specific
facilitates which are provided to the woman in need to change. The organization are supposed to
hire the people on the bases of skills and knowledge rather than gender which means the
requirement process should be altered. The members put a viewpoint to encourage woman only
to deal with customers (Kalev, and Deutsch, 2018). The operational work is not assigned to the
males only but to the female workers too which increase the productivity of the organization.
The flexible workings are allotted to everyone as it is supportive in work-life balance and
increase the productivity. Therefore, it is important to bring transformation in the functioning of
1

management. On the point of views of team, an organization can increase the working hours of
women and provide the same workload to males and females equally. The special treatment
should not have delivered to any of gender. On the point of views of team, an organization can
increase the working hours of women and provide same workload to males and females equally.
Special treatment should not be allocated for any gender at all so that both genders contribute in
productivity with equal capability. This will give assistance in increasing the positive culture
within the organization to enhance the brand value in the marketplace or it will attract more
customer toward the firms.
Argument of team B
Team B is against the transformation of economical purposes of business’ in society in order to
end the gender equality. According to the members of the team there is no requirement of
modification. The opposer of team A made a statement that as time changes the people will
adjust within the forthcoming year so why should invest capital in the transformation. Moreover,
it is good to invest on the assets of the organization. The organization or the business enterprises
should provide support to women and encourage women by delivering flexible working hours as
the women manage their jobs and household work together. Delivering extra attention to the
women is not wrong it will give assistance in building reputation in the market. As everyone has
capability of convincing and attracting customers which give benefits to company so
transformation is not important. The hiring and recruitment does not need to alter because of
equity gap (Kartolo, and Kwantes, 2019). The scheme or the plans of action of the production
company does not need to change because it very important to deliver equal workload to every
person. The salary or remuneration of male workers of the company should be higher because
they give extra working hours and workload. Almost every company treat the employees on the
basis of personal skills. The culture of the organization will be same because it delivers high
positivity in surrounding to increase the scale of productivity. The performance reviews process
do not need to transform as working people of the organization able to manage their working life
balance. In order to end the gender equality, we cannot take their human rights. The
transformation will not provide concern on safety and security to the women which result in
hesitation in doing work in the environment and increase unemployment. The team members
discuss the future analysis which says that empowering woman will increase the GDP by exactly
2

11 percent. Transformational activity will bring down the productivity of the organization, hence
we should not support transformation. The modification can acquire some risk of less profit in
the future for the company as people give support to the female.
Identification of Fallacies
Team A
The weak point of team A is that they focus on the equal rights mainly and question the
performance of woman. The members of team supposed to be more confident, so they can
attract the attention of the judge in effective manner. Squad team A can perform better by
maintaining patience while the other member addressing any statement. They need to work on
the impulsive nature so the point of view will be rigid.
Team B
Team B performed well, but they have capability to be more cooperative and coordinative
with the members. Like when one member is addressing any point in front of opponents the
other member should encourage the individual person which give more confidence. Squad B
have probability to give more statement in order to give tough competition. The members of the
group B mentions the specific data which took place in the future. Whereas the member should
mention the approx data because individual cannot give surety of what coming in the future. The
research should be proper and the statement will be based on the current facts.
Justification of The Scores
The members of the team A are putting instant question one by one. For instance, they
raise very important question that why organization supposed to pay Higher amount to them as
compared to men when they are delivering same skills and services to the firm. The members of
the team A are working in the coordination and cooperate with each other like when one
member is speaking then other one is listening carefully. The squad A gives valid point for the
transformation is important to increase to productivity. Member of team A putting back-to-back
3

question that work as the strength for team. The impassive point of the team B is that the
company continue to support the woman in order to catch the eyes of customers and focuses on
social issue to seek the emotional attention of the organization to increase the productivity of the
organization. In the statement made by team B that is men give extra workings hours to
organization is invalid point because the working hours of the workers in pre decide and if they
are giving extra hours it means they are taking extra benefits too. As per team B That is very
good point that woman handle personal as well as household life together, but man also manage
their families and cooperative life together (Kulich, and Chipeaux, 2019. In this context the
team A replied that the organization can alter the innovative technology to provide the security
to the woman and men together why only one person gets the safety and security. So, the
member of team B raise a voice that it will increase the maintenance expense. Team A answer
that Yes it required capital but not much it is one-time investment but beneficial for the rest of
time period.
Feedback on the performance and room of improvement
The B members are supposed to more inspirational by listing all the arguments. The
members of team A supposed to build confidence by supporting or encouraging everyone. They
can acknowledge themselves by making more research and clearing the doubts with the leaders
if having any sort of confusion. The members of team A should focus on topic transformation
and make statement more clear and effective, so they can connect the point in adequate manner.
For the further improvement they have possibility to give justification after mentioning any sort
of statement. The team B members should concentrate what the others are trying to express by
examine the point the opponents are mentioning. The member should make practice and prepare
themselves before making statement. For the area of the improvement the members have chance
to develop mindset for the justification.
Fairness and consistency in judging
Team A is more deserving as they are making or raising lots of questions and performing
well in the debate. The outcome of the debate is that yes the transformation is required. The
presentation of team A Criteria is better than Team B. As per the team A member feels that in
4

order to end the gender pay game the organization modify the opportunity criteria and encourage
the male and females equally. According to the team A transformation in culture is very
important as the woman are not depended on any male, or they are self-dependent then why the
special treatment allotted to them ( Press.Tak, Correll, and Soule,2019). That's very important
point made by the members of team B that hiring is done on the bases off skills not on gender
everyone is capable of doing work because they choose their field by their own choice. The men
are also insecure in the modern era, and they are humans and every person living on the planets
have equal rights.
CONCLUSION
From the above report it will be concluded that some transformation is required in the
business to achieve the economic goals in society. In a cooperative society gender doesn't matter
all matter is what the skills and knowledge individual is having to deliver the productivity in the
marketplace ( Ridgeway, 2014). Furthermore, also highlights the role-played by the members of
the team in the activity and enhance the knowledge.
5

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Agarwal, B., 2018. Gender inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability.
Blumberg, R.L., 2018. Introduction: engendering wealth and well-being in an era of economic
transformation. In EnGENDERing wealth and well-being (pp. 1-14). Routledge.
In Inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability (pp. 274-313). Princeton University
Kalev, A. and Deutsch, G., 2018. Gender inequality and workplace organizations:
understanding reproduction and change. Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, pp.257-
269.
Kartolo, A.B. and Kwantes, C.T., 2019. Organizational culture perceived societal and
organizational discrimination. Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion: An International
Journal.
Kulich, C. and Chipeaux, M., 2019. Gender inequality in economic resources. In The Social
Psychology of Inequality (pp. 35-51). Springer, Cham.
Press.Tak, E., Correll, S.J. and Soule, S.A., 2019. Gender inequality in product markets: When
and how status beliefs transfer to products. Social Forces, 98(2), pp.548-577.
Ridgeway, C.L., 2014. Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review,
79(1), pp.1-16.
6