The Impact of Globalisation in the Age of Trump: A Business Analysis

This essay examines the retreat from globalisation and the adoption of protectionist measures, particularly in the context of the Trump era. It analyses how over-reliance on localisation can hinder a company's ability to create value across borders. The essay discusses the balance between protectionist pressures and globalisation, focusing on arbitrage and aggregation strategies. It explores the impact of Trump's policies on multinational corporations, the role of geographical distance in trade, and the weakening of long-term cross-border policies. The analysis also covers adaptive strategies for firms, the importance of addressing societal issues, and the challenges posed by income inequality. Ultimately, the essay argues that while globalisation has faced setbacks, the extent of the reversal is often exaggerated, and the world remains interconnected through trade and investment. Desklib offers similar essays and study tools for students.

Running head: GLOBALISATION
Globalisation
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Authors Note:

1GLOBALISATION
Introduction
The essay constitutes the propaganda that estimates the mass retreats from
“Globalisation”. This has lead to the choice of several business strategies. The business
leaders believes that the segment of Globalisation is becoming flat and has become
unconstrained by the borders of country. The exaggerated claims were proven quite wrong
and ultimately the cries have resulted in a huge pull back for adjusting the protectionist
pressures. This has resulted “Globalisation”. Thus it can estimated through the situation of
the age that overreliance on the context of localisation can lead to hampering of companies
real ability for value creation across the borders for creating the glorious arrays of some of
the strategies of Globalisation (Ghemawat 2017). The essay is based on the detailed analysis
on the age of Trump and how it has affected Globalisation
Discussion
Complementing globalization with the pressure of protectionist has always been a
major task for any President in the recent times. An appropriate balancing of structural
improvement within the country and with the other countries on the perspective of
globalization is mainly based on the arbitrage and aggregation. Trump while framing
business policies have to follow two basic factors. First within the close proximity, the
chance of variance in the matter of resources is really, low that increases as the regions of the
countries gets wider (Chen 2018). Secondly, promising to improve the market scenario to
supply the requisites of the citizens through sound integration of centralized platforms at the
back end which incorporates production with effective R&D and all the supportive function
that begins with procurement and stretches to fill up the stores of finished products (Bulow
and Geanakoplos 2017). Here important decision has been taken by the Republicans to
influence the firms not only to influence the functionalities of the back end but also opening

2GLOBALISATION
up the market mechanism more inclined to controlled globalization with enhancement in the
technological front along with IT platforms.
Optimization of the formal structure with efficient alignment of perfect coordination
of various locations within the corporation has to be encouraged by the policy makers. For
years together the nation has emerged as a supreme regulator of international policies of
various countries. While few battles in the middle-east has utilized the stock of arsenal but at
the same time have forced the common citizen to make the agitation louder for the utilization
of national resources for the welfare of the country (Read 2018). In this regard a single wrong
move can inflict serious damage on the credentials of the Republicans. Furthermore with the
growth of cosmopolitanism Trump has to take on the countries policies which do not hamper
the sentiments of top hierarchy of some large companies.
It is almost certain that if Great Depression has failed to influence the scope of
business frontiers to great extent than this current trade war would also be very less effective
in this regard. As number of independent country has grown particularly in the last two
decades along with the far apart supply chain depends largely on the attitude of the
Republicans (Purnell 2018). It is quite evident that long geographical distance has played a
significant role in the merchandise trade. Interactions across the border have persuaded many
countries to join hands in framing economic policies in the interest of the people of whom a
growing portion encompasses inhabitants of other countries. Instead of this specific urgency
for globalization there has been a major downfall in it in the last four year roughly. The fall in
the commodity prices and a tremendous decline in the services which urge globalization
mingle with exchange rate shifting have affected performance to a great extent. Globalization
is further weakened by the deprivation of long term across border policies (Flew 2018).

3GLOBALISATION
The scenario has been so disheartening that the initiation of Trump has failed to
restrict the most deeply linked country that is Singapore from pulling back because of the
financial crisis instead of its development is only based on globalization that definitely
demands an urgent recovery in multi-nationalization (Heisbourg 2018). Though
globalization has the limitation of distance and not imperative for most industries but still
some industries with its firms have exploited it much more than required prior to financial
crisis. Trump’s challenge is further aggravated as even in the period favourable economic
condition and escalating globalization, the multinational movement has faced performance
issue. Today contingency of particular approach towards globalization has lost its way in the
midway.
The companies use adaptation that needs to be adapted for adjusting the cross-country
differences that orders to be responsive locally in certain globalisation strategies that consider
three strategies. In this age of Globalisation, firms must look for some of the opportunities for
the efforts that are adaptive enough. This can lead to the company have an clear impact of
protectionism (Pelkmans 2018). The obvious ways through which the company can go for
adapting the variety of products, market position, policies that completely suits the market
residing locally. Each of the variations and the costs involves the ways through which the
efficiency and effectiveness of findings can be well introduced. The business companies can
go for designing the most common platforms on which the variants that are local gets offered.
This also leads to externalisation of the cost adaptive methods that can be placed through
joint ventures, various forms of partnerships and franchising. It must be analysed that the
multinational houses automatically puts above the matters for evaluating the competitive
advantages that analyses the task of the local competitors (Hutchinson 2018). It is basically
based on the advancement of economies that also justifies the cross border strategies. On
most of the cases the economic rational is based on aggregationthis lead to a formation of a

4GLOBALISATION
profitable business within the foreignmarkets. The companies that face retrenchment
generally operated within the market. On turning to arbitrage, the vertical opportunities are
baaed on vertical multinationals that globalises on the side of demand but have narrowed in
the current financial years yet remaining large. Still the GDP per capita can be counted seven
times that of China’s estimation. On further research and analysis it can evaluated that on the
dispersion of some of the common corporate taxes that is levied across the country, the graph
of the curbing tax has been quite slow (Lester and dela Rama 2018). Moreover, the
differences in the cross-country safety, environmental standards and health all continue to
persist through exploitation of the ethical standards and concerns. It is very obvious that
multinationals emerge through the advantages and competing aboard the main basis of the
low cost is achieved. These are the strategies that help to drive the profitability and growth of
India’s offshore IT industrial services.
On understanding that how and what are the actual questions that engages the societal
issues for becoming prominent upon the agenda of the leaders. In most of the cases, the
prominent companies are seeing some of the much bigger impacts from the relevant factors
of macro economics that forms all the consideration competitively. These are the issues that
prominently include the agendas along with the government and media interactions that is
based on setting specific strategies (Sadat 2017). The highly regulated industries have some
of the listed companies that have been historically treated for the factors like the rate of
exchange, responses of policy pronouncements that is the outcome of fluctuations in share
prices. All the companies are constrained with all the responsibilities of development of the
all larger range of factors. According to the survey the general research that has been done
can be considered as a backslash that strives against the big industrial businesses (org Book
2017).

5GLOBALISATION
To be more specific on evaluating the business condition and the issues that are
socially related. It is quite hard to consider the simple and ordinary instructions but to cope
up with certain complexity; the semi-globalization law suggest a specific juncture and is
limited to one specific sight. All the multinational companies have the identification for both
the governmental and the agendas that are based on the societal issues that are linked locally
across the whole country. The law of semi- Globalisation suggests convergence in one
specific juncture. The only possible principle complain that arise in the context of
“Globalisation” is the chances of inequality and this has contributed to the rising of the
income that the large population that left within a large swath of population (Hallin 2018). In
the age of Trumpthe problem of income inequalities got raised within America. On the other
hand along with the perception that is widespread, the context of Globalisation has been
blamed primarily for bringing disturbance in the technological progression. On addressing
much of the current issues, it can be estimated that some of the current issues are much
related to the impacts that are caused by semi-globalisation. As the essay is not restricted to
the law of semi-globalisation it is also not confined to any idea or sentiments of anti-
globalization. Thus it can be estimated that the time of globalisation in the age of Trump had
fallen off significantly. Thus the strategies of Globalisation have also advanced beyond the
models of history. This has further made the world remain more globalised in the context of
foreign investment directly along with the trade terms (Cambria 2017).
In this essay it has been constitutedthat prospective is the main and essential theme for
development and upgradation in the context of Globalisation. In the case where president
Trump’s perspective that is apparent for the deregulation on the domestic level and the
international intervention seems to be politically sound enough. On analysing both the
common perspective notions and both the market and the non- market strategies both can be
aligned to the case simultaneously (Voelz 2017). It must be understood that company may

6GLOBALISATION
eventually lead to Globalisation. It is not at all a wanted situation for supporting the policies
actively. It ends up building up huge barriers in the flow of capital in the business along with
certain trade barriers. This also demonstrates that people are becoming less mobile and it is
absolutely delegitimising the core ideathat the global companies can contribute effortlessly to
the country’s well being even if the shareholders of the company fails to have the
shareholding value. On analysing the business, condition in the long run it can be estimated
that the companies that are relies upon heavy resourcing and involves exports and imports are
much benefited from joining all the forces that opposes the structure of protectionism (Sparke
2018).
Conclusion
On understanding the current perspective, it can be estimated that the actual amount
of change that is required on the context of reversing approach of Globalisation is much less
than the amount that people actually thinks of. In the recent years as survey estimates all the
activitiesat international level is stagnant but still not has significantly fallen off. On the other
aspect, in the age of Trump, Globalisation has suffered a reversal violently and the experience
can be described like the 1930’s beginning time. It can be estimated that on reverting to the
multinational structure that was formed about 100 long years ago leads to the formation of
structures that are based on trading. Some of the practices and strategies have got beyond the
specified prescription of the models pf histories that implies that all the leaders would be not
served adequately for going backward. On considering the exaggerated perception the
Globalisation depth can be extended for some of the international activities that can be
disturbed globally and focussed narrowly. It can be specifically analysed from this essay, that
the global trade war has virtually hurt each and every aspect of the national economy. Infact
dome countries are more in risk. It has evaluated that countries like Singapore, has a small
but highly developed economic structure that can be estimated to be around 176% of its total

7GLOBALISATION
GDP rate. It has been evaluated that small countries have big exports like Luxembourg has
214%, Ireland has 124% and Netherlands has 82%. The comparatively bigger countries have
much small exports and is having a percentage count like, US has 13%,Brazil also 13% and
Japan 18%. These comparisons have estimated and evaluated by the World Development
Indicators of World Bank (WDI).

8GLOBALISATION
Reference
Bulow, J. and Geanakoplos, J., 2017. Greece’s sovereign debt and economic realism. CEPR
Policy Insights, (90).
Cambria, L., 2017. Why does globalisation no longer work? Do Trump and Brexit mark the
beginning of a new age of deglobalisation? (Bachelor's thesis, Università Ca'Foscari
Venezia).
Chen, X., 2018. Globalisation redux: can China’s inside-out strategy catalyse economic
development and integration across its Asian borderlands and beyond?. Cambridge Journal
of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), pp.35-58.
Flew, T., 2018. Post-Globalisation. Javnost-The Public, 25(1-2), pp.102-109.
Ghemawat, P., 2017. Globalization in the age of Trump. Harvard Business Review, 95(4),
pp.112-123.
Hallin, D.C., 2018. Mediatisation, neoliberalism and populisms: the case of
Trump. Contemporary Social Science, pp.1-12.
Heisbourg, F., 2018. War and Peace After the Age of Liberal Globalisation. Survival, 60(1),
pp.211-228.
Hutchinson, M., 2018. The coming age of de-globalisation and why we should welcome
it. Quadrant, 62(5), p.18.
Lester, M. and dela Rama, M., 2018. Neo-protectionism in the Age of Brexit and Trump:
What Does Australia Do with Its Powerful Friends?. In Revisiting Globalization (pp. 91-119).
Springer, Cham.
org Book, A.V., 2017. Economics and Policy in the Age of Trump.

9GLOBALISATION
Pelkmans, J., 2018. Trade policy-making under irrationality. CEPS Commentary, 12 March
2018.
Purnell, M., 2018. Globalisation and its Impact on the Journal Collections of Research
Libraries in Australia: A Health Library’s Perspective. Journal of the Australian Library and
Information Association, 67(1), pp.55-63.
Read, B., 2018. Truth, masculinity and the anti-elitist backlash against the university in the
age of Trump. Teaching in Higher Education, pp.1-13.
Sadat, L.N., 2017. Whither human rights in the era of Trump. Netherlands Quarterly of
Human Rights, 35(2), pp.77-84.
Sparke, M., 2018. Geoeconomics, Globalisation and the Limits of Economic Strategy in
Statecraft: A Response to Vihma. Geopolitics, 23(1), pp.30-37.
Voelz, J., 2017. Transnationalism and Anti-Globalism. College Literature, 44(4), pp.521-526.