logo

Argument on Globalization

5 Pages1090 Words82 Views
   

Added on  2023-06-03

About This Document

This paper argues in favor of the negative effects of globalization on cultures and travel. It provides evidence to support the argument that globalization has caused cultures to lose their uniqueness and has ruined the aspect of people traveling to explore new cultures. The paper also discusses the rise of negative nationalism as a result of globalization.

Argument on Globalization

   Added on 2023-06-03

ShareRelated Documents
Running head: ARGUMENT ON GLOBALIZATION
ARGUMENT ON GLOBALIZATION
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author note
Argument on Globalization_1
1
ARGUMENT ON GLOBALIZATION
The paper aims to argue in favor of the two chosen points put forward by the student
regarding globalization. It will provide evidences to support the argument that globalization has
negatively influenced cultures across the world and caused them to lose their uniqueness.
Further, the paper will provide supporting arguments in favor of the statement, that globalization
has ruined the aspect of people traveling to different places to explore new and unique cultures.
Globalization phenomenon hit the world during the late 20th century and swept over all
facets of life. Amongst other things, globalization’s influence has been the most on culture.
Those who are not aware about this phenomenon must know that globalization is a phenomenon
where businesses and cultures of different nations interact with each other internationally (Steger
2017). Scholars however differ in their views about the influence of globalization especially on
the cultures of the world. A valid reason is there for the differing perspectives on globalization
that it did not have an equal effect on everyone. While one section of the world have immensely
benefitted from it, other section was deprived remarkably. As Rodrik (2011) points out, the
underdeveloped nations did not reap any benefits from globalization, as it was assumed. The
scholar states that the main reason behind its failure has been the absence of a neutral party that
could oversee or govern globalization.
Smith (2013) on the other hand, focuses on the bad effects of globalization on world
cultures. The author is of the view that globalization has destroyed the uniqueness associated
with different cultures by blurring the boundaries. When one looks at the status of the cultures in
the contemporary era, the author’s argument seems valid. Smith (2013) takes the argument
further stating that globalization has ‘Americanized’ almost all the cultures in the world. In fact,
globalization is nothing but Americanization of the world cultures. In almost all the countries,
one can see the presence of American lifestyle dominating local cultures through brands like
Argument on Globalization_2

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Globalisation – A Threat to National Sovereignty
|6
|1271
|445

Native Americans and Religion
|5
|1040
|317

Assignment on Study Tour in USA
|10
|2622
|77

Influence of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony on Romantic Period Composers
|12
|4015
|96