1HEALTH CARE ECONOMICS Discussion: Due to fluctuations in the price of oil as well as increasing healthcare costs, the government will not be able to sustain future demands which resulted in the development of public insurance of the public and private health care in Saudi Arabia. the government, through its Vision 2030 and the National Transformation Program (NTP), has developed strategy to address the challenges of the current healthcare system. This discussion will focus on of pros and cons of private vs. public insurance in healthcare in Saudi Arabia in terms of assessments of efficiency, information asymmetry, moral hazard, and adverse selection. Pros and cons the private health insurance: Private sectors are well funded and well maintained as it charges the high health care cost from the consumers and hence private insurance are more efficient compared to the public insurance. The private health insurance uses various technology to document information which resulted in reduced error regarding information. It reduces the administrative cost that enables health care services to spend less on the billing and decrease the pressure from the public system. It also has short response time which may reduce adverse clinical incidents (Mensi et al., 2018). Moreover, in terms of adverse selections, it has less adverse selection since buyers and sellers have equal information due to the presence of technology. Considering the cons, compared to the public health insurance, the rate of the moral hazard is high as the population is required to purchase additional health care cost. Consequently, thepopulationofdifferentdemographicsespeciallywiththelowsocioeconomicor disadvantageous area cannot afford the private health care insurance that resulted in the high inequalities in terms of access to the health cares (Banafea & Ibnrubbian, 2018).
2HEALTH CARE ECONOMICS Pros and cons of public health insurance in Saudi Arabia: Compared to private health insurance in Saudi Arabia, the rate of moral hazard is low since the government is funding the majority of the health care services. In the Kingdom of SaudiArabia(KSA),theMinistryofHealthhasbeenthelargestpayerinhealthcare. Consequently, the population of different demographics especially with low socioeconomic or disadvantageous area will have equal access to the health care services (Aljadhey et al., 2016). The patients with chronic diseases living in the socially disadvantageous area can receive health care services based on the severity of the chronic disease. Considering the cons, it is less efficient in terms of the health care services since there is a huge burden on the ministry of health of Saudi Arabia which resulted in the unequal distribution of the services and staff salary that in turn impact the efficiency (Alharbi, 2019). Moreover, public health insurance is funded by the government and the majority of the health care sectors align with public health insurance are funded. Consequently, due to the high burden, the government failed to provide funds for the technological use which resulted in information asymmetry (Alharbi, 2019). Moreover, in terms of adverse selections, it is considered as adverse selection since buyers and sellers have unequal distribution of information due to the absence of technology.
3HEALTH CARE ECONOMICS References: Alharbi, M. F. (2019). National health insurance system for universal health coverage: prospects and challenges in Saudi Arabia.International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health,6(11), 5006. Aljadhey, H., Mahmoud, M. A., Ahmed, Y., Sultana, R., Zouein, S., Alshanawani, S., ... & El Kinge, A. R. (2016). Incidence of adverse drug events in public and private hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: the (ADESA) prospective cohort study.BMJ open,6(7), e010831. Banafea, W., & Ibnrubbian, A. (2018). Assessment of economic diversification in Saudi Arabia through nine development plans.OPEC Energy Review,42(1), 42-54. Mensi, W., Shahzad, S. J. H., Hammoudeh, S., & Al-Yahyaee, K. H. (2018). Asymmetric impactsofpublicandprivateinvestmentsonthenon-oilGDPofSaudi Arabia.International Economics,156, 15-30.