Immunization Controversy in the Medical Profession

This article discusses the controversy surrounding immunization in the medical profession. It also suggests strategies to promote immunization of children and provide the best healthcare in the situation.

Running head: HEALTH CARE
Health care
Name of the student:
Name of the University:
Author’s note

1HEALTH CARE
Immunization controversy in the medical profession:
Immunization is one of the most important weapons to protect children from serious
illness and reduce the burden of infectious disease. However, there is great controversy
surrounding the immunization process because different people have different opinion about
immunization (Malual et al., 2018). There are some groups of people who deliberately delay
immunizations whereas there are some who refuse vaccination for their children. Full
immunization coverage varies based on geographical location, cultural values and
socioeconomic status of parents. A study by Lakew, Bekele and Biadgilign (2015) investigating
about low rate of immunization coverage among children revealed that mothers delayed
immunization due to their cultural values, socioeconomic circumstances and access to
vaccination service in the area. For example, the study revealed that rich families fully
vaccinated their children compared to poor families. In addition, lack of awareness about the
community vaccination program was also associated with delay in immunization process. This
evidence shows the influence of mother’s knowledge and awareness on vaccination process.
In contrast to the above evidence, McNeil et al. (2019) presented different side of the
argument. It revealed that many people completely refused vaccination because of past negative
reactions to vaccination, lack of trust regarding the benefits of vaccines and poor perception
about vaccination. Common reason cited by mothers regarding delaying or not to vaccinate their
children included the belief that ‘vaccination is unnecessary, vaccination cannot improve health
of their children’ and poor perception about the safety of vaccines. Compared to this, the reason
for some group to accept immunization included positive perception about safety of their child
through vaccination and preference to health and wellness (McNeil et al., 2019). Hence, many
could not afford to increase risk for their children by not vaccinating. These evidences suggest

2HEALTH CARE
how vaccination is a controversial topic and changing different perception related to
immunization is a challenging task for the health care professionals. As vaccines are not
obligatory in many countries, low vaccination still remains an issue in many low-developed
countries (Holt et al., 2016).
Education to promote immunization of children:
As a medical professional, it is necessary to educate child caregivers about the risk of not
vaccinating their child and addressing the negative perception related to harm associated with
vaccination. For example, they can be explained that any negative past event following
vaccination might have occurred because of other reasons instead of the direct use of vaccines.
The first strategy is to explore their reasons for not vaccinating and then use targeted educational
actions to address negative perception and hesitancy regarding use of vaccination services in the
community. In addition, referring them to important community vaccination program and
schedule will help them to timely vaccinate their children (Lee et al., 2018).
Approach to provide the best health care in the situation:
To ensure that caregivers of children are not forced to vaccinate their child, motivational
interviewing technique will be applied to educate them and provide the best health care. This can
be done with the use of skills like open-ended question, reflective listening, respecting client’s
values and using empathy to suggest the need for change. This strategy will help to fulfil the
value of respect and autonomy of caregivers regarding decision making and gently persuade
them to utilize vaccination to improve their child’s health (Dubé et al., 2019).

3HEALTH CARE
References:
Dubé, È., Farrands, A., Lemaitre, T., Boulianne, N., Sauvageau, C., Boucher, F. D., ... &
Gagnon, D. (2019). Overview of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, vaccine hesitancy and
vaccine acceptance among mothers of infants in Quebec, Canada. Human vaccines &
immunotherapeutics, 15(1), 113-120.
Holt, D., Bouder, F., Elemuwa, C., Gaedicke, G., Khamesipour, A., Kisler, B., ... & Seeber, L.
(2016). The importance of the patient voice in vaccination and vaccine safety—are we
listening?. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 22, S146-S153.
Lakew, Y., Bekele, A., & Biadgilign, S. (2015). Factors influencing full immunization coverage
among 12–23 months of age children in Ethiopia: evidence from the national
demographic and health survey in 2011. BMC public health, 15(1), 728.
Lee, Y. M., Riesche, L., Lee, H., & Shim, K. (2018). Parental HPV knowledge and perceptions
of HPV vaccines among Korean American parents. Applied Nursing Research, 44, 54-59.
Malual, A. C., Jowi, Y., Irimu, G., & Admani, B. (2018). Missed opportunities for immunization
among children attending a Paediatric Outpatient Clinic at Juba Teaching Hospital. South
Sudan Medical Journal, 11(2), 36-39.
McNeil, D. A., Mueller, M., MacDonald, S., McDonald, S., Saini, V., Kellner, J. D., & Tough, S.
(2019). Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and
against vaccination. BMC public health, 19(1), 49.

4HEALTH CARE