This article discusses the importance of patient mobility in critical care units and the success of team effort and strategic intervention. Two research articles are reviewed and summarized.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: HEALTH CARE RESEARCH HEALTH CARE RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND UTILIZATION Name of the Student Name of the University Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1HEALTH CARE RESEARCH Introduction The development of new technologies for the patients of critical care unit has increased the ability of the patients to survive such conditions (Nydahl et al., 2014). However, patient mobility is still a concern as in mechanical ventilation, patients are surrounded with tubes, catheters and several monitoring equipment. As the patient in intensive care unit is unable to move themselves, nursing professions focus on implementing different plan of care. These activity protocols are important on determining therapeutic benefits (Adler & Malone, 2012). The primary aim of these protocols to provide a guideline, so that following the clinicians can takenecessarysteptodetermineimprovementinthepatient’shealthcondition.Inthis assignment patient mobility related two papers will be reviewed and summarized. Article 1 In this research article, the primary aim of the researchers Perme and Chandrashekar (2009) were to determine the concerns of staffs present in surgical intensive care unit while caring for patients who are unable to mobilize themselves. To determine this, the researchers used “Plan-do-study-act model starting from without intervention to 6 months and 1 year after implementationofinterventionandfocusedonstepslikeplanningimplementationand evaluation process. To determine the mindset related change, prior to application of intervention, staffs were asked to fill a questionnaire and therefore by conducting the survey, 2 weeks prior, 6 months later and 1 year later, the mindset related changes in staffs were observed. After determiningthe medianscore,the score demonstratedthatmaximumstaff wereable to understand the mobility related issues in patients and therefore the agreed that with minimal support of healthcare personnel the patients are able to move out of their bed and with this
2HEALTH CARE RESEARCH activity, the length of their stay decreases. Therefore, this research was able to determine that interdisciplinary team of SICU was able to care for patients with mechanical ventilation without any bias (Perme & Chandrashekar, 2009). Article 2 Another research was conducted by Castro et al. (2015) to determine the effect of long bed rests or prevention from mobility on their health status. The researchers divided the program in four phases and thereby different informations were provided to the healthcare staffs such as patient education, positioning, duration and frequency of the mobility, and type of mobility exercise depending on the type of patients. The primary goal of this program was to let the patient sit on the edge of the bed, without any support and further proving them a walker to increase their mobility. Therefore throughout the four phases the healthcare professionals were screened while conducting their challenging care for the patients with mobility concerns in ICU and these programs were helpful in increasing the focus of healthcare personnel in caring for patients and also decreased the loss of functional abilities. Further, using the four stages intervention, an outline of standard program was developed and therefore it increases the chance of creating the standard for dealing with patients with minimal mobility (Castro et al., 2015). Conclusion An early mobility program is useful in determining patient safety and therefore, a team approach should be developed by using a strategic plan so that implementation of intervention can be improving for the patient. These two articles discussed in this section determines the success of team effort and strategic intervention.
3HEALTH CARE RESEARCH References Adler, J. and Malone, D., 2012. Early mobilization in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal,23(1), p.5. Castro, E., Turcinovic, M., Platz, J. and Law, I., 2015. Early mobilization: changing the mindset.Critical care nurse,35(4), pp.e1-e6. Nydahl, P., Ruhl, A.P., Bartoszek, G., Dubb, R., Filipovic, S., Flohr, H.J., Kaltwasser, A., Mende, H., Rothaug, O., Schuchhardt, D. and Schwabbauer, N., 2014. Early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients: a 1-day point-prevalence study in Germany.Critical care medicine,42(5), pp.1178-1186. Perme, C. and Chandrashekar, R., 2009. Early mobility and walking program for patients in intensivecareunits:creatingastandardofcare.AmericanJournalofCriticalCare, p.ajcc2009355.