6 High-Care Hospitals for Residents: Cost-Free Treatment by State Boards
VerifiedAdded on 2019/11/26
|9
|2298
|446
Report
AI Summary
The essay provides an overview of the healthcare systems in New Zealand and the UK, highlighting their similarities and differences. Both countries have a publicly funded system, with New Zealand's health insurance schemes accelerating the process of operations. The UK's National Health Service (NHS) is England's publicly funded healthcare system that accounts for most of the department's budget. The essay also discusses the challenges faced by the healthcare systems in both countries, including inequalities in access to essential medications and funding issues. It highlights the importance of user-friendly information and stakeholder collaboration in improving healthcare outcomes.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
Name of the Student
Name of the university
Author’s note
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
Name of the Student
Name of the university
Author’s note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
Healthcare system of New Zealand Vs United kingdom
Health setting consists of institutions, organizations, resources, health care professionals
and the care givers whose primary concern is to provide health benefits to the public. A health
system should be able to deliver promotive, preventive, rehabilitative and curative interventions
by a combination of a health care pyramid and actions of the public health, that deliver
individual healthcare (Frieden, 2010). A health system should be financially fair and also should
be responsive while providing treatment to the patient (Mozzialos et al., 2015). A health system
requires the fund supplies, efficient staffs, communication and transport to provide an overall
guidance to provide a proper health care to the clients.
This essay compares the primary healthcare setting between the New Zealand and UK. In order
to compare this, the building blocks set up by the WHO have been taken into consideration
(Mozzialos et al., 2015). The essay critically analyses the differences in terms of the social,
cultural and political or economic differences of the two nations.
There are different frame works set by WHO to measure the health system capacity like the
inputs and the outputs and helps to relate the frameworks to the outcomes ("The WHO Health
Systems Framework", 2017).
The strategic framework for the health system is required in order to bring out better
outcomes from the health care settings. The health system framework includes the following- 1.
The World Bank knobs framework 2. The WHO building blocks frame work 3. The WHO frame
work for the assessment of the health system. Such frame works are required to strengthen the
health system.
Healthcare system of New Zealand Vs United kingdom
Health setting consists of institutions, organizations, resources, health care professionals
and the care givers whose primary concern is to provide health benefits to the public. A health
system should be able to deliver promotive, preventive, rehabilitative and curative interventions
by a combination of a health care pyramid and actions of the public health, that deliver
individual healthcare (Frieden, 2010). A health system should be financially fair and also should
be responsive while providing treatment to the patient (Mozzialos et al., 2015). A health system
requires the fund supplies, efficient staffs, communication and transport to provide an overall
guidance to provide a proper health care to the clients.
This essay compares the primary healthcare setting between the New Zealand and UK. In order
to compare this, the building blocks set up by the WHO have been taken into consideration
(Mozzialos et al., 2015). The essay critically analyses the differences in terms of the social,
cultural and political or economic differences of the two nations.
There are different frame works set by WHO to measure the health system capacity like the
inputs and the outputs and helps to relate the frameworks to the outcomes ("The WHO Health
Systems Framework", 2017).
The strategic framework for the health system is required in order to bring out better
outcomes from the health care settings. The health system framework includes the following- 1.
The World Bank knobs framework 2. The WHO building blocks frame work 3. The WHO frame
work for the assessment of the health system. Such frame works are required to strengthen the
health system.
2HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
The WHO frame work describes the health system in terms of 6 core components which are also
termed as the ‘building blocks’. They are- 1. The service delivery 2. The health information
systems, 3. The health work force 4. Financing 5. Access to the essential life saving
medicines 6. Governance or leadership. The main aim of this building block is to provide an
improved health, responsiveness, social and financial protection from the risks involved in health
care ("The WHO Health Systems Framework", 2017).
These six building blocks can strengthen the health care setting in many ways. Some
components like the governance leadership and the health information systems acts as the base of
the regulation and the policy of the other building blocks. The crucial components of the building
blocks are the health work force and the financing (Swayne et al., 2012). The technologies and
the medical products and the service delivery show the immediate productivity of the health
system. WHO’s original objective for the building blocks is to promote understanding of the
health care setting, addressing new challenges related to the healthcare. It strengthens WHO’s
role in the health care system in a world that is continuously changing (Fidler & Gostin, 2011).
The service delivery component of the WHO health care settings set up standards for the
essential service packages. It promotes the use and the access of services, provision of the
prevention and the provision services locally. Human resources include the identification of the
support to the community workers, partnership with the facility based workers for giving
efficient services. It is to provide feedback regarding the performance of the health workers
("The WHO Health Systems Framework", 2017). The information component demand and use
the information oversight. The financing component drives the resources allocation through the
voting, taxes and purchasing decisions. The leader ship component designs the regulations and
The WHO frame work describes the health system in terms of 6 core components which are also
termed as the ‘building blocks’. They are- 1. The service delivery 2. The health information
systems, 3. The health work force 4. Financing 5. Access to the essential life saving
medicines 6. Governance or leadership. The main aim of this building block is to provide an
improved health, responsiveness, social and financial protection from the risks involved in health
care ("The WHO Health Systems Framework", 2017).
These six building blocks can strengthen the health care setting in many ways. Some
components like the governance leadership and the health information systems acts as the base of
the regulation and the policy of the other building blocks. The crucial components of the building
blocks are the health work force and the financing (Swayne et al., 2012). The technologies and
the medical products and the service delivery show the immediate productivity of the health
system. WHO’s original objective for the building blocks is to promote understanding of the
health care setting, addressing new challenges related to the healthcare. It strengthens WHO’s
role in the health care system in a world that is continuously changing (Fidler & Gostin, 2011).
The service delivery component of the WHO health care settings set up standards for the
essential service packages. It promotes the use and the access of services, provision of the
prevention and the provision services locally. Human resources include the identification of the
support to the community workers, partnership with the facility based workers for giving
efficient services. It is to provide feedback regarding the performance of the health workers
("The WHO Health Systems Framework", 2017). The information component demand and use
the information oversight. The financing component drives the resources allocation through the
voting, taxes and purchasing decisions. The leader ship component designs the regulations and
3HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
the policies, implement transparency and accountability ("The WHO Health Systems
Framework", 2017).
The following essay aims to compare and contrast between the heath care system of New
Zealand and the United Kingdom. The comparison has been done on the basis of the building
block components set by WHO.
The health care system of New Zealand has undergone several changes over the past few
years. In the 20th century it was a public system, but in the last there decades many reforms have
been introduced regarding insurances creating a public and private mixed system (Timmins &
Ham, 2013).
The accident corporation covers the accident cases including the medical misadventure.
There are relatively high care hospitals for the residents, that cost them free of charge treatment
which is managed by the state boards. The difficult operations often take prolonged time unless
it’s an emergency. For this reason, health insurance schemes have been introduced to accelerate
the process ("New Zealand health system", 2017). These insurances fund the operations of their
clients as per the different schemes. Emergency services are provided by the St. John New
Zealand charity and the Wellington free ambulance. These are supported by a National both
private and public funds. On the other hand the health care system in UK is provided by the
National Health Service, which is England’s health care system that is publicly funded. It
accounts for about most of the budget of the department of health (Steele & Cylus, 2012). The
health care system in UK provides free ambulatory services in case of the emergencies. These
services are generally supplemented by British Red cross and St Andrews ambulance
association. Other than this air provides transportation system by the Scottish ambulance service
the policies, implement transparency and accountability ("The WHO Health Systems
Framework", 2017).
The following essay aims to compare and contrast between the heath care system of New
Zealand and the United Kingdom. The comparison has been done on the basis of the building
block components set by WHO.
The health care system of New Zealand has undergone several changes over the past few
years. In the 20th century it was a public system, but in the last there decades many reforms have
been introduced regarding insurances creating a public and private mixed system (Timmins &
Ham, 2013).
The accident corporation covers the accident cases including the medical misadventure.
There are relatively high care hospitals for the residents, that cost them free of charge treatment
which is managed by the state boards. The difficult operations often take prolonged time unless
it’s an emergency. For this reason, health insurance schemes have been introduced to accelerate
the process ("New Zealand health system", 2017). These insurances fund the operations of their
clients as per the different schemes. Emergency services are provided by the St. John New
Zealand charity and the Wellington free ambulance. These are supported by a National both
private and public funds. On the other hand the health care system in UK is provided by the
National Health Service, which is England’s health care system that is publicly funded. It
accounts for about most of the budget of the department of health (Steele & Cylus, 2012). The
health care system in UK provides free ambulatory services in case of the emergencies. These
services are generally supplemented by British Red cross and St Andrews ambulance
association. Other than this air provides transportation system by the Scottish ambulance service
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
4HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
in Scotland (Steele & Cylus, 2012). It has been reported that about 18% of the income tax of the
citizens go towards the healthcare. About 4.5 % of the gross domestic product goes towards the
health care, which is about 0.18984 trillion GDP. The growing private healthcare system of UK
is smaller than the public sector. It has been found that the New Zealand spent almost 8.7% of
the total GDP in healthcare (Winnard et al., 2012). Studies have shown that New Zealand spends
the lowest level of medications use, and spends very low on the healthcare.
The health information system of the UK consists of the commissioner, that is the
primary care trusts, the providers such as the GPs and the hospitals (Burwell, 2015). Population
information is provided by the office of National Statistics (England and Wales). The health and
the social care information are provided by the NHS information center, PHOs, primary care and
the hospital trusts (Gott et al., 2012). There are public health observatories that combine the
qualities of the academic departments and the health departments to improve the health care. The
health information strategy of New Zealand tries its best to meet the requirements of the national
health information. Te department is involved in the funding and the regulation of the policies of
the healthcare system. The information should be user friendly; they are able to provide the data
from both manual and electronic based system (Winnard et al., 2012).
It has been reported that a growing and an ageing population has created challenges for
the health care system of the New Zealand. Initiative has been taken to develop a dynamic and a
sophisticated work force that covers demographies of the specialty specific workforce. The
healthy work force New Zealand provides guidelines to the ministry of health and the director
general of health to help the offices to rationalize with the work force planning. The health work
force facilitates to work with the stake holders in order to prepare a sustainable work force.
in Scotland (Steele & Cylus, 2012). It has been reported that about 18% of the income tax of the
citizens go towards the healthcare. About 4.5 % of the gross domestic product goes towards the
health care, which is about 0.18984 trillion GDP. The growing private healthcare system of UK
is smaller than the public sector. It has been found that the New Zealand spent almost 8.7% of
the total GDP in healthcare (Winnard et al., 2012). Studies have shown that New Zealand spends
the lowest level of medications use, and spends very low on the healthcare.
The health information system of the UK consists of the commissioner, that is the
primary care trusts, the providers such as the GPs and the hospitals (Burwell, 2015). Population
information is provided by the office of National Statistics (England and Wales). The health and
the social care information are provided by the NHS information center, PHOs, primary care and
the hospital trusts (Gott et al., 2012). There are public health observatories that combine the
qualities of the academic departments and the health departments to improve the health care. The
health information strategy of New Zealand tries its best to meet the requirements of the national
health information. Te department is involved in the funding and the regulation of the policies of
the healthcare system. The information should be user friendly; they are able to provide the data
from both manual and electronic based system (Winnard et al., 2012).
It has been reported that a growing and an ageing population has created challenges for
the health care system of the New Zealand. Initiative has been taken to develop a dynamic and a
sophisticated work force that covers demographies of the specialty specific workforce. The
healthy work force New Zealand provides guidelines to the ministry of health and the director
general of health to help the offices to rationalize with the work force planning. The health work
force facilitates to work with the stake holders in order to prepare a sustainable work force.
5HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
The workforce in the health care system of refers to those that are directly employed by
the NHS in the hospital and the community health service, the GPs and the community health
services. It has been reported that there were about 1,070,262 FTE staffs being appointed under
the NHS.
Inequalities in access to essential medications indicate failures in the healthcare system.
Although the health care system of the Zew Zealand has made considerable changes for the past
few decades. Loops and gaps are still present when it come so that accessibility of the life giving
medicines, and public always do not get access to the appropriate health care, specially who
doesn’t come under the insurance coverages.
The UK health care system is mainly funded by the public. There are a number of
regulatory bodies that monitor the type of care provided by the public and the private sectors.
There are 3 bodies that are responsible for the regulation of the health insurance in UK. The type
of care provided is monitored by the department of health or the regional organizations.
The normal expenditure on the health care system in UK is increasing gradually. This
year it has been reported to be an extra $879 million ("New Zealand health system", 2017). The
political, social and the cultural differences between the two nations also cater to the differences
in the health care system. It has been reported that the New Zealanders enjoy a high health status
as compared to the international standards. It has been reported that the current life expectancy
rate is about 82 years for woman and 78 years for the men. In comparison to this the life
expectancy rate of UK is much lower.
The essay provides us with an idea about the different building blocks of the health care
setting. These building blocks have been set up by WHO, in order to provide a proper health care
The workforce in the health care system of refers to those that are directly employed by
the NHS in the hospital and the community health service, the GPs and the community health
services. It has been reported that there were about 1,070,262 FTE staffs being appointed under
the NHS.
Inequalities in access to essential medications indicate failures in the healthcare system.
Although the health care system of the Zew Zealand has made considerable changes for the past
few decades. Loops and gaps are still present when it come so that accessibility of the life giving
medicines, and public always do not get access to the appropriate health care, specially who
doesn’t come under the insurance coverages.
The UK health care system is mainly funded by the public. There are a number of
regulatory bodies that monitor the type of care provided by the public and the private sectors.
There are 3 bodies that are responsible for the regulation of the health insurance in UK. The type
of care provided is monitored by the department of health or the regional organizations.
The normal expenditure on the health care system in UK is increasing gradually. This
year it has been reported to be an extra $879 million ("New Zealand health system", 2017). The
political, social and the cultural differences between the two nations also cater to the differences
in the health care system. It has been reported that the New Zealanders enjoy a high health status
as compared to the international standards. It has been reported that the current life expectancy
rate is about 82 years for woman and 78 years for the men. In comparison to this the life
expectancy rate of UK is much lower.
The essay provides us with an idea about the different building blocks of the health care
setting. These building blocks have been set up by WHO, in order to provide a proper health care
6HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
to the public. The whole essay provides with a vivid description regarding the health care
settings in New Zealand and UK. A comparison had been brought regarding the health care
strategies of these two nations structuring and following the WHO framework. The framework
had been able to bring out the different aspects and the components of the health system that an
organization should follow. It critically analyses the differences in the health care techniques
regarding the health care policies, funding system. It also compares about the different life
expectancy rates. Finally it can be concluded that a lot more researches are still required to cover
the loops and the holes of the health care system of both the countries.
to the public. The whole essay provides with a vivid description regarding the health care
settings in New Zealand and UK. A comparison had been brought regarding the health care
strategies of these two nations structuring and following the WHO framework. The framework
had been able to bring out the different aspects and the components of the health system that an
organization should follow. It critically analyses the differences in the health care techniques
regarding the health care policies, funding system. It also compares about the different life
expectancy rates. Finally it can be concluded that a lot more researches are still required to cover
the loops and the holes of the health care system of both the countries.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
7HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
References
Burwell, S. M. (2015). Setting value-based payment goals—HHS efforts to improve US health
care. N Engl J Med, 372(10), 897-899.
Fidler, D. P., & Gostin, L. O. (2011). The WHO pandemic influenza preparedness framework: a
milestone in global governance for health. Jama, 306(2), 200-201.
Frieden, T. R. (2010). A framework for public health action: the health impact
pyramid. American journal of public health, 100(4), 590-595.
Gott, M., Seymour, J., Ingleton, C., Gardiner, C., & Bellamy, G. (2012). ‘That’s part of
everybody’s job’: the perspectives of health care staff in England and New Zealand on
the meaning and remit of palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 26(3), 232-241.
Mossialos, E., Wenzl, M., Osborn, R., & Anderson, C. (2015). International profiles of health
care systems. The Commonwealth Fund, 2016.
New Zealand health system. (2017). Ministry of Health NZ. Retrieved 9 September 2017, from
http://www.health.govt.nz/new-zealand-health-system
Steele, D., & Cylus, J. (2012). United Kingdom (Scotland): health system review. Health systems
in transition, 14(9), 1-150.
Swayne, L. E., Duncan, W. J., & Ginter, P. M. (2012). Strategic management of health care
organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
References
Burwell, S. M. (2015). Setting value-based payment goals—HHS efforts to improve US health
care. N Engl J Med, 372(10), 897-899.
Fidler, D. P., & Gostin, L. O. (2011). The WHO pandemic influenza preparedness framework: a
milestone in global governance for health. Jama, 306(2), 200-201.
Frieden, T. R. (2010). A framework for public health action: the health impact
pyramid. American journal of public health, 100(4), 590-595.
Gott, M., Seymour, J., Ingleton, C., Gardiner, C., & Bellamy, G. (2012). ‘That’s part of
everybody’s job’: the perspectives of health care staff in England and New Zealand on
the meaning and remit of palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 26(3), 232-241.
Mossialos, E., Wenzl, M., Osborn, R., & Anderson, C. (2015). International profiles of health
care systems. The Commonwealth Fund, 2016.
New Zealand health system. (2017). Ministry of Health NZ. Retrieved 9 September 2017, from
http://www.health.govt.nz/new-zealand-health-system
Steele, D., & Cylus, J. (2012). United Kingdom (Scotland): health system review. Health systems
in transition, 14(9), 1-150.
Swayne, L. E., Duncan, W. J., & Ginter, P. M. (2012). Strategic management of health care
organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
8HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF NEW ZEALAND VS UNITED KINGDOM
The WHO Health Systems Framework. (2017). WHO Western Pacific Region. Retrieved 9
September 2017, from
http://www.wpro.who.int/health_services/health_systems_framework/en/
Timmins, N., & Ham, C. (2013). The quest for integrated health and social care: a case study in
Canterbury, New Zealand. Kings Fund.
Winnard, D., Wright, C., Taylor, W. J., Jackson, G., Te Karu, L., Gow, P. J., ... & Dalbeth, N.
(2012). National prevalence of gout derived from administrative health data in Aotearoa
New Zealand. Rheumatology, 51(5), 901-909.
The WHO Health Systems Framework. (2017). WHO Western Pacific Region. Retrieved 9
September 2017, from
http://www.wpro.who.int/health_services/health_systems_framework/en/
Timmins, N., & Ham, C. (2013). The quest for integrated health and social care: a case study in
Canterbury, New Zealand. Kings Fund.
Winnard, D., Wright, C., Taylor, W. J., Jackson, G., Te Karu, L., Gow, P. J., ... & Dalbeth, N.
(2012). National prevalence of gout derived from administrative health data in Aotearoa
New Zealand. Rheumatology, 51(5), 901-909.
1 out of 9
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.