Health Promotion: Implementation, Evaluation and Research

Health Promotion 1
Health Promotion
Health promotion, Implementation, and evaluation.
Author’s Name
Department
University
Author’s contact information
Word count

Health Promotion 2
Article ID
(abbreviate
d
reference)
Specify
strategy
(refer to
2.1)
Underlying
theories or
constructs
(refer to 2.3)
Ottawa
Charter
action
area/s
Strategy context
(time, place,
environment,
resources) (refer
to 2.5-2.7)
Research
question or
purpose
(refer to
2.9)
Evaluation
type,
methods
and
measures
Critically
appraise the
evaluation
(refer to 2D-
E)
Results Applicability to
your project
(reproducible,
similar context
and target group)
(refer to 4)
Level
of
evidenc
e
(I-IV)
(refer to
Append
1)
Clifford et
al., [2]
Skills
enhanceme
nt for the
work force.
Generate
programs
that are in
line with
people’s
way of life
or
Educational,
Behavioural,
Environmenta
l, social
learning
theory.
To
improve
peoples’
competenc
y in
healthcare
for the
natives of
Australia
the
following
Conducted at
June 2012-
July 2013.
It was done
at the USA
and
Australia.
The
environmen
t was the
hospital.
Does skills
enhanceme
nt for the
workforce
improve
peoples’
competency
in
healthcare
for the
natives of
The program
has used the
process as
well as
outcome
evaluation to
check on the
effectiveness
of the
program.
An increase in
natives’
involvement
in providing
health care
to their own
people. An
improvemen
t in the
levels of
patient
The
measureme
nt lacks
rigorous
study
designs,
there is no
sufficient
evidence
on the
effectivene
I, the
study
used a
random
sample.

Health Promotion 3
resources
for
indigenous
peoples,
indigenous
work force
increment.
areas were
addressed:
- training
of health
workforce,
increasing
the
number of
indigenous
personnel
and
introductio
n of
culturally
specific
health
programs.
Resources
Health
professional
s,
indigenous
patients,
Hospital
facilities
(cancer
screening
equipment,
medicines
etc.).
Australia.
Will
increase in
the number
of
indigenous
personnel
improve
cultural
competency
in
healthcare
for
indigenous
peoples of
Australia?
Quantitative
methods of
data
collection
were used.
Outcome
evaluation
was carried
out on the
following
measures: -
health
professionals
’
improvemen
ts in their
confidence,
improvemen
t in the
satisfaction
of patients
and
improved
satisfaction
and medical
trust
reported.
Improvemen
ts in
pharmacists’
ability to
handle
indigenous
health
matters.
Improvemen
t in attitude
as well as
awareness.
Improved
multicultura
l
competence.
ss to raise
the
standards
of different
personnel
in
healthcare
for
indigenous
peoples of
Australia
despite the
interventio
ns applied.
Therefore,
the
program
cannot be
reproduced
in a similar
context