Assignment on Healthcare - Globally

Running head: HEALTHCARE
HEALTHCARE
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:

HEALTHCARE
1
Introduction
In Australia as well as globally, there has been witnessed a programme led by
consumers as well as carers further advocated by national plan to decrease seclusion as well
as restrictive practices in Australian mental health facilities (Baumgardt et al., 2019). The
principal of recovery coordination has relied to the reality that consumers whether or not
suffering from signs of mental disorder have been significant in setting their individual
urgencies for care as well as obtain the required sustenance to live an important life. The
operations of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in
2008 has strengthened the programmes and practices which focus on reducing seclusion and
restrictive practices. According to Hercelinskyj and Alexander (2019), seclusion and restraint
are known as interventions in the domain of clinical practices which are at present authorized
to use in providing mental health facilities as well as other segments in order to regulate or
deal with behavioural patterns of individuals. The term ‘seclusion’ typically refers to the
cautious quarantine of an individual in a particular room or area in order to restrict the
person’s exit from that space. While, the word ‘restraint’ tend to take into account the
utilization of physical force such as physical restriction or any kind of method to regulate
individuals’ freedom of movement such as mechanical restraint in addition to the medicinal
usage for controlling behavioural pattern of individual instead of treating a mental disorder or
chemical restraint (Ash et al., 2015). The thesis of the essay is “there is a robust agreement
claiming that the use of seclusion as well as restraint can be destructive due to violations of
human rights and the trauma which people experience due to this seclusion and effective
measures can aid services to reduce the need to use these practices.”
Discussion
The impacts of seclusion to consumers and healthcare professionals alike

HEALTHCARE
2
In Australia, the six federations along with two regional administrations subsidize and
provide public sector mental health facilities which offer specialist treatment for consumers
suffering from critical mental health problems. As per reports, it has been accounted that
around 2-3% of Australians which can be estimated for nearly 600,000 inhabitants have
diagnosed critical mental disorder which involves high levels of depression, anxiety or
psychosis. On the other hand, around 0.5% of the population suffering from certain forms of
psychotic disorder which is typically is diagnosed as schizophrenia. However, severe
apprehensions about the practice of seclusion as well as mechanical restriction in mental
health settings have been upraised since 1993 (Brophy et al., 2016). Furthermore, there has
been found contrary findings by researchers on severe harms which have been caused due to
the restrictive practices. On the other hand, concerns have been shown regarding levels of
deprivations of liberty, intervention with individual honesty in addition to the loss of self-
respect.
A number of research have noted hostile costs for those exposed to seclusion as well
as mechanical restraint and upturned apprehensions of human rights breaches (Prophy et al.,
2016). Meanwhile, wide range of studies have illustrated adverse costs for clients who have
been positioned on the receiving end of seclusion and restrictive practices and have thus
upraised distresses regarding human rights breaches (Fletcher et al., 2019). In the view of
Bowers et al. (2015), majority of discussion tend to shed light on the desire and appeals of
consumers want to understand an effective decrease in the practice of seclusion and
restrictive practice due to the severe trauma and distress the practice causes. As a result,
consumers in the Australian mental health care setting do not perceive restrictive practice to
be acceptable and correct. Patients along with their supporters like families, friends in
addition to other associates recently have been raising concerns regarding the severe
‘emotional restraint’ consumers are receiving.

HEALTHCARE
3
The impact of restrictive practices on consumers develops a feeling of constriction in
voicing their opinions in a direct and honest approach to the practitioners or nursing
professionals due to the fear of the consequences (Scanlan & Novak, 2015). Additionally,
emotional restraint in this stage has been associated with the pressures of abiding the
behavioural potentials. At this juncture, Schulz (2019) has indicated that individuals who
have been labelled with mental disorders face immense bias and discernment similar to the
experiences encountered by other devalued groups. Since the term ‘stigma’ is typically used
for the experiences encountered by consumers, the term indicates the term cites the problem
as within the individual (Brophy et al., 2016) Thus, in order to neutralize emotional
restriction, prejudice in addition to discernment, it is highly crucial that the standpoints of
consumers in addition to their supporters are proclaimed in addition to acknowledged in the
mental health system which might further be grounded as much on pressure as care.
Recent reports have claimed that experiences of consumers due to restrictive practice
have been extremely undesirable and destructive further linked to the direct intensification of
suffering, anguish and penetrating feelings of despair, humiliation, fear and fury. On the other
hand, Fletcher et al. (2019) have claimed that in comparison to professionals, consumers have
been of the opinion that lessening or removal of restrictive practices will be more desirable
and practicable. Furthermore, consumers as compared to nursing professionals or carers tend
to show greater likelihood to consider that restriction and control causes harms. Wahlbeck
(2015) has claimed that the injuries and harm caused by seclusion and restrictive practices
give rise to forceful treatment experienced by consumers. Such impact has been seen as an
unprotected expression of the weakness and subjection of consumers.
Moreover, consumers across Australia have exhibited similar concerns related to the
negative impacts caused by restrictive practices. The harms have been viewed to be causal
effect of deliberate efforts of extreme force, segregation in addition to the violation of human