This qualitative study examines the decision-making process of family carers for people with dementia who lack capacity. It explores the facilitators and barriers to decision making and provides information for carers to overcome these barriers. The study aims to improve the understanding of decision making in dementia care.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: HEALTHCARE Topic: HEALTHCARE Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1HEALTHCARE Quantitative article:Wang, C., Schmid, C. H., Fielding, R. A., Harvey, W. F., Reid, K. F., Price, L. L., ... & McAlindon, T. (2018). Effect of tai chi versus aerobic exercise for fibromyalgia: comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial.bmj,360, k851. 1.Did the trial address a clearly focused issue? The study in the articular experiment has been done for determining the effectiveness of the interventions of tai chi which has been in comparison with aerobic exercise. The author has considered the incorporation of physical exercises as the standard treatment method among patients with fibromyalgia and the test has been done based on the effectiveness of the dose or the duration. Thus the authors has been successful in clearly addressing the main research thesis of the experiment. 2.Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomised? Patients in the give study has been randomized and been assigned to their respective supervisors for supervised various aerobic exercise for an interval of 24 weeks almost twice every week. Moreover one out of the four Yang style usually supervised tai chi interventions have been done along with the participants of the studies followed for 52 weeks.The concept of adherence has been rigorously encouraged usually in telephone and mainly by person.Randomization is important as it helps in ensuring that randomization of statistical studies has been done and used extensively. Randomization is important for the prevention of selection through biasnessandithelpsinensuringagainstanyaccidentalbias.Ithelpsinthe comparison of various groups and ultimately helps in the elimination of sources through biasness for the treated assignments (Ruff et al., 2014). 3.Were all of the patients who entered the trial properly accounted for at its conclusion?
2HEALTHCARE Regarding the participation of the subjects patient supervision of Tai Chi program though 12- 24 weeks of training. The recruitment of the participants have been done with the use of various combinations of the advertisements as well as through clinics which has been located in the greater Boston region. Therehasbeennoevidenceoftheexperimentstoppedearlythroughoutthe experiment. The adherence of the studies has been done extensively through the help of person’s through telephone. The calculations of the sample size had been based mainly on the results of the previous trials involving fibromyalgia.Regarding the maintenance of the drug uses the patients has usually maintained the regular treatment through drugs (Lavery et al., 2014). 4.Were patients, health workers and study personnel ‘blind’ to treatment? The kind of trials done in this experiments has been a single blinded trail. After the selection of the participants baseline assessments had been one where assessment had been performed prior to the enrolment of the subjects. Randomization have been done in the study. There has been the presence of arrangement based factorial which would be mainly used for the approval of the Tai chi instructor who have conducted every trial throughout trials. Assessments have been done and privacy has been maintained through sealed envelopes which would be opened by the participants mainly followed by the participants. This would be followed by the consent which has been obtained individually by the instructor. The significance of the single blinded trials are that they are done with the prior knowledge of the participants and done at the knowledge of various participants through the group membership as well a group membership regarding the identity of various results regarding the biasness of the studies.
3HEALTHCARE 5.Were the groups similar at the start of the trial Participants has been chosen for the study inclusive of qualitative randomized control trials. The assessments have been done on a pain index of scale of 7 and the symptom severity has beenassessed with the help of severity scale score of more than The studies have been affected by the gender as women who had been pregnant during the study or have involved in the planning of pregnancy during the study period has been considered for the study.Moreover the language speaking ability also has been a factor affecting the studies a people who had not spoken English have been considered for the study. Moreover the selection of the subjects also has been done on the people who have not been able to pass the mini mental examination. Thus the selection of the participants have been based on their ability for continuing with the routine drugs along with their visits to the physicians throughout their study. Thus, the author has been successful in clearly mentioning the various factors which could be instrumental in addressing study. 6.Aside from the experimental intervention, were the groups treated equally? There has been consideration of equal treatment of the group’s throughout the studies. Most of participants have been encouraged for receiving the Tai Chi inclusive of the aerobic exercise protocol. Most of the Tai chi lessons have been lasting for almost 6minutes and the aerobic exercises had been done for 1 hour for a time interval of 12 as well 24 weeks along with the continuation of the aerobic sessions for almost 24 weeks. Attendance sheets have been usually used for monitoring the participants and their regular attendance during the treatment sessions.Including the various interventions, there has been continuous monitoring of the various adverse events as well as safety protocols. Thus it has been considered necessary for the enhancement
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4HEALTHCARE of a balance group regarding the studies conducted during the randomised control trails for measuring the outcomes. 7.How large was the treatment effect? Primary effect of outcomes have been the changes of the FIQR scores which has been ranging from 0 to 100. The FIQR has been considered as well as rated as validated multidimensional instrument for the measurement of the rated overall severity consisting of carious diseases like intensity of pain, depression, fibromyalgia, job difficulty as well as overall wellbeing. It has been also been the updated version inclusive of the original fibromyalgia impact questionnaire has been important for the estimation of the minimal clinical importance of the scale and its score based on various minimal clinically importance based on the FIQ score. Regarding the secondary outcomes they has been measured usually at the baseline levels consisting of 12, 24 as well as 52 weeks and this has included the global assessment which has been used for the creation ofvisual analogy scale. Various scales which has been used for assessment include arthritis efficacy scale, hospital as well as anxiety scale, along with the implementation of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Thus there has been proper impact of the treatment effect which would help in the evaluation of the assessment of the group assignment of the participants. Various other measures affecting the impact of the survey include body mass index, the various outcome expectations of the experiment along with the safety as well as adherence of the factors involves in the study (Jolly et al., 2015). 8.How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect? There has been the calculation of the sample sizes which has been based on the results of the trial as which has been conducted previously. Fixed effect models have been done longitudinally which has usually based on the basis of the intent to
5HEALTHCARE treat the people based on the aforementioned principle. There has been determination of the comparative efficiency of the various five treatments along with the considered of the baseline data.The results have usually been represented between various groups of 95% confidence intervals. This has been usually done on the estimated value based on eth longitudinal models. The significance of confidence intervals in statistical studies involves the depiction of various risks. There is inclusion of various ranges of the values which has been used for calculations. The sample size is the main factor on which the confidence interval depends. Usually for the statistical studies involving statistics and randomized control trails and confidence interval of 85% have been used. Large sample sizes in surveys and usually indicative of greater confidence and the involvement of narrow interval on sifedence. Large confidence intervals are usually indicative of larger sample sizes. 9.Can the results be applied to the local population, or in your context? From the various results of the statistical survey it can be understood that Tai Chi has been proved as the usually and most effective way of non-drug intervention for the reduction of pain in the patients suffering from myalgia. There would be recording of the various therapeutic benefits and they would be consistent among the instructors. Moreover the larger sample sizes would be a proof of the various generalizability of the experimental results which could be usually applied to the general population. Thus the usually of the larger sample sizes would be beneficial in its implementation in the complementary therapy which would ultimately use in complementary therapy for reducing the change of the adverse effects of the various medications used for the treatment of the patients suffering for fibromyalgia. 10.Were all clinically important outcomes considered?
6HEALTHCARE According to the specifications given by the author, there has been equal consideration of the clinically important outcomes in the study which has been inclusive of occurrence of adverse anxiety, drug reactions along with the prevalence of pain and depression. Moreover the factors affecting the sleep quality and the mental component has also been considered. Thus the improvements are tailored and in per alignment with the baseline data and the collection is done prior to the administration for intervention. 11.Are the benefits worth the harms and costs? Tai chi has been considered as better methods of the inclusion of various complementary exercise and therapeutic processes which has not only been used of the treatment of pain in diseases like fibromyalgia. The benefits of the exercise has been involved in the physical and mental well-being of the people. Initial costs have been much more than the benefits involving the Tai chi Instructor but there has been subsequent reductions in the medicines as well as hospital related costs(Wang et al., 2018). Qualitative article:Livingston, G., Leavey, G., Manela, M., Livingston, D., Rait, G., Sampson, E., ... & Cooper, C. (2010). Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK.Bmj,341, c4184. 1.Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? The research studies done here has been the identification of various decision making processes made by family carers. This identification has been aimed on behalf of the people
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7HEALTHCARE suffering usually from dementia and the various facilitators as well as barriers to the decision making process have been determined. The author has finally aimed at the production of information inclusive of the family carers which would be involved about overcoming the barriers.Thusaimsoftheresearchstudyhasbeenclearlyjustifiedthroughthe implementation of a qualitative focus group study revolving around the complex decision making processes though individual interviews(Meriam & Grainer, 2019). 2.Is a qualitative methodology appropriate? The qualitative process which has been taken in the study has been used in throwing light on the process of complex decision making process which would involve the care given to the heath carers giving care to people who have been suffering from dementia. The research gap have been overcome by the author with proper justifications regarding the implementation of medical conditions during end of life. The various research methodologies have been conducted in the phases which is inclusive of the generation of various common areas among the family carers through initial focus group studies. In the second phase of the interview there has been individual interviews regarding the concepts of the family carers. However, statistical analysis of the data has been through the study of socio demographic variables through the use of various software programs management. Thus the qualitative method taken by the author has been appropriate. 3.Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research? The various research design of the articular experiment has been done in three ways inclusive of data collection followed by data measurement and data analysis. The data collection process has been one in two ways, initially through focus group study for the generation of the areas where family carers would make decisions which has been on behalf of recipients of care. The second phase has been during in-depth individual interviews about carers which have decision making throughout their lives.Selection of the sample size has
8HEALTHCARE been based on the people who are family caregivers and would be answering on the behalf of dementia patients. For covering various range of experiences, the sample has been selected with diverse socioeconomic characteristics. These methods have been followed by data measurement where the responses during the interview has been measured, data analysis studieshasbeen done after recording the interviewsand transcribing themverbatim. Anonymous participation has been used in the experiment. 4.Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research? Inthefollowingexperimentconductedbytheauthorstherehasbeenproper justification of the settings where the people chosen from the hospital in the inner as well as outer areas of London has been selected. The participation by the subjects has been justified by the author inclusive of for general activist, specialist neurodementia clinic along with community clinics. No such mention about the permission taken for the participants has been mentioned. There has been clear specification of the primary as well as secondary care in the different phases of the study. The voluntary participation of the people and the justification for the people who have not participated in the study has been not been specified. 5.Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? The settings of the experiment has been among the participants against a hospital setting in the areas of London. Thus the setting for the experiment has been justified.This has been a focus group study inclusive of the qualitative analysis of the decision making process of the care givers. The author have justified the methods of the study inclusive of the survey including the two phases of focus group study and discussion of interviews for decision making process the procedure of the interviews and participation of the subjects have been well justified by the author. The analysis process have also been well detailed and justified by the author however there have been no mention of voluntary participation. 6.Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered?
9HEALTHCARE There has been a method of data collection from the research participants in the qualitative research inclusive of focus studies. Various information where participants which has been used in proper research settings which has been dependent on the relationship between the researcher and research. There has been negotiation of rules in the research agenda inclusive of changes in experience. This exchange has been done in the inferior and superior positions emerging as intertwined central themes in the discussions. There have been qualitative researches which have led to power relation confirming the variability of data in various ways. There is proper communication of the caregivers’ days after information is sent asking the permission of the participants. Their consent and the discussion along with voluntary participation proves the validity of research. 7.Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? Ethical consideration is important for the validity as well as reliability of the primary research which has been inclusive of insurance regarding the prevention of any act of violation as well as any issues regarding the protection regulation of the individuals taking part in a study. They are important in avoiding or resolving ethical dilemmas. This might occur during planning and the conduction of the primary research inclusive of methods like surveys, interview and surveys. The research and development committee have already approved the research ethics of the study. Any other additional data has not been given during the study. Thus all the major ethical aspects of the study has been considered. 8.Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? Rigor in an experimental study is defined as the quality of research process. Rigor has been found to be related to the development of trustworthy findings. In the given experiment there has been digital recordings of the interview along with their transcription verbatim. Moreoverusefulinformationhavebeenremovedforpreservingtheanonymity.The researcherhaveusedqualitativeresearchprogramAtlas.ti.5.2forthedevelopmentof
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10HEALTHCARE management Thus there has no attachment of the coding section which would be considered insufficient for the analysis of rigor. 9.Is there a clear statement of findings? Aresearchstatementisdefinedasthemainsummarizationoftheresearch achievements including proposal for upcoming research. Thus all the necessary information inclusive of theorists have been recorded in very brief presentation. According to the findings as of the research statement as funded by BUPA foundation. All the researchers in the study are independent of finders. Thereby from the study it can be understood that there has been a clear justification of the findings as there is absence of holistic presentation. There is a clear portrayal of the research accomplishment of research of research. This would help in meeting the research objectives. The finding statement is not adequate. 10.How valuable is the research? The main purpose of the research has been identification of the complex decision making processes which has been given by the health carers on behalf of the patients suffering from dementia. Thus through the qualitative study focusing on the decision making ability of the caregivers, the existing decision making process in the backdrop of healthcare has been discussed. The author has been successful in consideration of the findings of the decision makers in relevance to the current healthcare practice. The author have also stressed on the importance of family conflict on the difficulty level of decision making process. Thus the concept of family consulting options has not proved enough for the benefits of the caregivers. The author has clearly justified the unanswered questions and limitations of the study. Moreover, the unanswered questions have been implying further development in the research world. Thus the research findings have been valuable and have successfully addressed the concern regarding the research question.
11HEALTHCARE References Jolly, S. S., Cairns, J. A., Yusuf, S., Meeks, B., Pogue, J., Rokoss, M. J., ... & Gershlick, A. (2015).RandomizedtrialofprimaryPCIwithorwithoutroutinemanual thrombectomy.New England Journal of Medicine,372(15), 1389-1398. Lavery, L. A., Fulmer, J., Shebetka, K. A., Regulski, M., Vayser, D., Fried, D., ... & Grafix Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. (2014). The efficacy and safety of Grafix® for the treatmentofchronicdiabeticfootulcers:resultsofamulti‐centre,controlled, randomised, blinded, clinical trial.International wound journal,11(5), 554-560. Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds.). (2019).Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass. Ruff, C. T., Giugliano, R. P., Braunwald, E., Hoffman, E. B., Deenadayalu, N., Ezekowitz, M. D., ... & Yamashita, T. (2014). Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.The Lancet,383(9921), 955-962. Wang, C., Schmid, C. H., Fielding, R. A., Harvey, W. F., Reid, K. F., Price, L. L., ... & McAlindon, T. (2018). Effect of tai chi versus aerobic exercise for fibromyalgia: comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial.bmj,360, k851.