The Influence of Ownership on Heritage and Cultural Site Management

This essay examines the impact of different types of ownership management, specifically public versus private, on heritage and cultural sites, primarily focusing on the UK. Public organizations, often government-funded, prioritize visitor facilities and site preservation for future generations, adhering to government regulations. In contrast, private organizations focus on profit generation through site management and development. The essay highlights how public ownership, exemplified by the Tower of London, balances monument preservation with visitor amenities like drinking water and rest areas, catering to diverse visitor needs, while private ownership models prioritize financial returns, potentially influencing site development and visitor experiences differently.

Heritage and Cultural Tourism Management
Influence of Several Types of Ownership
Management On Heritage and Cultural Sites
Ownership can be divided in to different parts
like public and commercial and these are having a huge
difference in their working styles and motives. These are
having a huge impact on then heritage and cultural sites
which creates a huge impact also on their visitors.
Focusing on UK most of the heritage valued visitor’s
points, these are managed by the government. UK
government is concern to protect these heritages valued
monuments from natural disaster and damage from
change in climate. Government also making them more
attractive for their visitors by providing more facilities
which can help to them to increase number of visitors for
that heritage valued sites. Here are the different types of
ownership are available;
Public Ownership: Most of the organizations which are
working by government funding are covered in public
organizations. They work according to government rules
and guidelines and they are totally controlled by the
government.
Private ownership: It is owned by private organisation
and they are having their focus to make money by their
acts. These organisations are working to manage these
heritages valued sites which can help to them to make a
better change and development at that sites.
Difference in between both ownership
Concern to work: Public organisations work to
provide better facilities to visitors and also to retain
their heritage sites for future. Private organisation is
not having any type of public cause behind their work,
they just work to make profits by their act.
Developing sites: Public ownership companies are
working to make a [proper change and development in
heritage valued sites but on the other side private
ownership is working to make profits.
Impact of ownership on heritage sites
Government organisation are having a proper focus to
make a proper development of heritage sites, Tower of
London is managed by public ownership organisation.
They are having a balanced focus on this monument
and as well as on facilities provided by them to
visitors. They are providing drinking water, shelters
for rest and proper sitting arrangements which can
help to them to make a better suppo0rt to old and
young visitors.
Effect of different type of ownership management on heritage and cultural sites