Freedom of Speech Cases in the 1980s-90s

This assignment examines five landmark Supreme Court cases concerning freedom of speech that occurred between the late 1980s and early 1990s. It analyzes each case, including *Texas v. Johnson*, *R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul*, *Bethel School District v. Fraser*, *Lopez v NYPD*, and *2 Live Crew (Skyywalker Records, Inc. V. Navaroo)*. The paper discusses the court's rulings, legal arguments, and societal context surrounding these decisions. It argues that while the courts emphasized legal aspects of freedom of speech during this period, the cases reveal a broader trend towards expanding First Amendment protections.

Running head: HISTORY GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT US
History growth and development US
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author note

1HISTORY GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT US
This paper discusses various cases in relation during the period of late 80s and early 90s in which
the issue was related to the freedom of speech. The paper would also depict the political, social
and economic condition of the country during the period based on the decision of the courts in
these cases. The paper discusses five cases which had been ruled by the Supreme Court where
the decision of the lower court was either over turned and a writ of certiorari was issued or the
decision had been upheld
In the case of Hector Lopez v New York Police Department 1993 action had been commenced
by the petitioner to overturn the denial by the NYPD with respect to his request for freedom of
information law. A cross move had been filed by the NYPD towards dismissing the claim based
in the argument that adequate search criteria had not been provided by the petitioner and a
negative result had been yielded through a diligent request. In the case it was adjudged by the
court that the petition is not allowed without prejudice. It was further ordered by the court that
the cross motion of the NYPD to dismiss the appeal had been granted and the proceedings are
dismissed without any prejudice to a supplemental or new request in accordance to the terms of
the decision.
In the case of Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) the defendant Johnson burned an American
Flag outside of the convention center. At the center the Republican National Convention of 1984
was being held in Dallas Texas. The flag had been burnt by the defendant in protest of the
policies and procedures which have been implemented by President Ronald Reagan. The
defendant had been arrested for the charge of breaching a Texas statue which opposed the
desecration of any venerated object which included the American flag in case it was done to
incite anger in the public. The defendant had been tried and convicted of the offence by a Texas
court. An appeal had been made by Johnson in which he argued that his actions were "symbolic

2HISTORY GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT US
speech" and therefore had protection of the First Amendment. The Supreme Court decided to
hear the case. The issue before the court in this case was that whether the burning of a flag
constituted a "symbolic speech" which was protected by the first Amendment. The judges of the
Supreme Court based on the principles of freedom of speech ruled that actions which may be
offensive to the society may be protected by the freedom of speech even if the act is outrageous
for the society. Thus the court ruled that the brining of the flag constituted a "symbolic speech".
In the case of R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992) the United States Supreme Court
had rejected crime ordinance and over turned the conviction of a teenager who is referred in the
court as R.A.V who had burnt a cross on a lawn of a African American family. The court held
that the teenager had not violated the protection provided in relation to the freedom of speech by
the first amendment. In the petitioner and several other teenagers and built a cross with the help
of a broken chair. The cross was erected and burnt in the yard of an African American family
who resided across the house of the petitioner. A charge was put on the defendant for breaching
the St. Paul Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance. The court provided the decision in favor of the
petitioner and ruled that the act was protected by the freedom to speech.
In the case of Bethel School District v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986) a landmark decision had
been provided by the Supreme Court in relation to freedom of speech in public schools. The
petitioner had been suspended from school for making a speech which included sexual double
entendres. It was held by the Supreme Court that the first amendment was not violated by the
first amendment. The student went through the grievance procedure of the school but his speech
was still adjudged as vulgar and offensive. The Supreme Court overturning the decision provided
by the court of appeal ruled that the policy of the school of suspending the student was not
against the rights provided by the first amendment.

3HISTORY GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT US
In 2 Live Crew (1990) Skyywalker Records, Inc. V. Navaroo it was ruled by the south Florida
district court provided that the action of the sheriff was an unconstitutional restriction upon the
freedom of speech. The judgment of the district court had been appealed by the live crew in the
11th circuit court of appeals and argued that the district court did no properly apply the miller test.
Obscene was defined as what is related to sex in an offensive way, disgusting to the sense and so
excessive as to be offensive. In the initial judgment was made by the county court based on
Florida statue §847.011. It was ruled by the district court that the album was obscene after the
application of the Miller test. The question before the court was that whether the album has
serious artistic, literary and political value. It was also to be determined by the court that whether
as a whole the album appeals to prurient interest when relevant community standards are applied.
According to the decisions in the above discussed cases which were primarily decided in the late
80s and the early 90s the Social, Economical and political situation can be discussed. At that
time a lot of emphasis was provided in the legal aspect of case rather than the political social or
economic aspects. This is because all the decisions which had been made by the court were
primarily based on legal aspects of the freedom of speech. Significant freedom had been
provided by the first amendment in relation to the freedom of speech. In one case it was seen that
bring or a flag was not considered as a violation of law which clearly depicts that emphasis was
not put on political condition of the time by the courts.

4HISTORY GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT US
References
2 Live Crew (1990) Skyywalker Records, Inc. V. Navaroo
Bethel School District v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986)
Lopez v NYPD (1993)
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992)
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)