2 Why is Coer's vision of elections with no political parties better than Tocqueville's vision needing political parties? In the 19th century, permanent political parties were unfamiliar in the western world. The current political system has changed and permanent political parties are being used almost in every country for election purposes. According to cooper political parties are formed to encourage harm and lead citizens in the wrong direction when it comes to the judgment of character. In politics, we see and hear politicians condemning each other. However, it is hard to tell who is right since their passions prejudices differ. Cooper views parties as an element of error.1However, the leaders or rather the people in those political parties pledge citizens to support them instead of pledging them to support the policy of the state. This where the mistakes start. The leaders have their own personal interests instead of serving the interest of the citizens by supporting the policy of the nation. According to cooper, the presence of parties in a nation leads to corrupt, vicious, and unprofitable legislation with the aim of defeating the party. During campaigns, there has been a division between states as well as division based on ethnic background. This because some leaders in a certain political party come from a specific sate or ethnic background. This has extended the hatred and divisions as far as to learning institutions and business organizations. When party rules people do no rule. In real situations, parties encourage polarization. Parties are seen as instruments of uniting people but they have failed to do so. There is a specific level of righteousness assigned to a specific party making people who do not agree with it to be perceived are wrong or traitors and those who agree to be perceived as right. However, it may 1Cooper, et al.,The American democrat and other political writings, n.d..
3 not be the case. Political parties may encourage ideas but in cases where those ideas agree with their party. Political parties have had a tendency to prioritize themselves. According to cooper, the impact of a part is always to supersede power. For example, in a monarchy, it checks the king, and in a democracy, it controls the people. The 2016 American presidential election cost was estimated to be $6.4 billion. The presidential race estimating to cost $2.38billion. On the other hand, in 2012, the total cost was estimated at $6.2 billion and $2.6 respectively. There are many issues affecting the US. The amount of money used would have assisted in solving critical issues affecting the US. This explains how political parties prioritize themselves so that they can be in power. Why is Tocqueville's vision of government with political parties better than Cooper's vision of no political parties in elections? According to Alexis, the unlimited freedom of association in the political parties are still productive in America and have not yet produced fatal outcomes. In America, once a political party dominates, all persons go through their hands. This gives a chance to its supporters to occupy offices and absolute control of all organized forces.2This hinders the opposite party to access power. This means that a political party’s increase connections. It also allows persons to network and makes friends whom they can share the political idea. Alexis perceives political as a form of a unit which brings people who combine efforts in betterment of citizens’ rights. People perceive association as an act of war and which brings about harmful acts.3However, this may be 2AlanKahan.Aristocratic liberalism,Routledge, n.d. 3Alexis De Tocqueville,Alexis de Tocqueville on democracy, revolution, and society, n.d.
4 the case. Alexis gives an example of an association in an army. The army needs members to build up courage and march against the enemy. This should be the case for political parties. They may be used in tackling problems affecting the citizens by sharing ideas. The US takes political parties differently. As per Alexis, people who form the minority party do so with the aim of weakening the moral authority of the majority and stimulate competition.4They try to come up with arguments which create an impression on the majority since them how to attract the majority over to their side and exercise power in their name. Although political parties are perceived to have negative effects, trey encourage public participation by encouraging a common citizen to be politically active. This explains why Alexis views political parties to be better. References Cooper, James Fenimore, Bradley J. Birzer, and John Willson.The American democrat and other political writings. Vol. 8. Regnery Publishing, 2001. 4Alexis De Tocqueville,Democracy in America, n.d.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
5 De Tocqueville, Alexis.Alexis de Tocqueville on democracy, revolution, and society. University of Chicago Press, 1982. De Tocqueville, Alexis.Democracy in america. Vol. 10. Regnery Publishing, 2003. Kahan, Alan.Aristocratic liberalism: the social and political thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. Routledge, 2017.